mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gianfranco Dutka <gianfranco.dutka@arista.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Gianfranco Dutka <gianfranco.dutka@arista.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] PCI/sysfs: NULL res_attr slot after kfree as defence against double-remove
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 14:13:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260520211306.3301893-1-gianfranco.dutka@arista.com> (raw)

pci_remove_resource_files() frees the bin_attribute pointed at by
pdev->res_attr[i] / pdev->res_attr_wc[i] but does not clear the slot
after kfree().  If pci_remove_sysfs_dev_files() is ever invoked twice
against the same pdev, the second pass dereferences a freed
bin_attribute and faults inside strlen() called from
kernfs_remove_by_name_ns().

To the best of my knowledge no in-tree caller hits this today -- the
primary path (pci_stop_dev() -> pci_remove_sysfs_dev_files()) is
expected to fire once per device -- so this is being submitted as
defence-in-depth rather than as a fix for a reproducer in the upstream
tree.  The motivation is that a freed-but-not-cleared pointer in a
device-lifetime table is a sharp edge: any future caller (in-tree or
out-of-tree) that re-enters the teardown path turns it into a UAF
with no warning.  Other allocator-managed pointer tables in the
kernel NULL the slot after kfree() for exactly this reason, and the
two-line change makes pci_remove_resource_files() idempotent at
essentially zero cost.

For full disclosure: the way I encountered this was via an
out-of-tree PCIe hotplug driver on an AMD Ryzen Embedded V3000
platform.  The driver re-enters pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device()
against a pdev that the standard pci_destroy_dev() path has already
torn down, and with slub_debug=FZPU the second entry faults with the
classic POISON_FREE signature:

  BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b
  RIP: strlen+0x4
  Call Trace:
    kernfs_find_ns
    kernfs_remove_by_name_ns
    sysfs_remove_bin_file
    pci_remove_resource_files
    pci_remove_sysfs_dev_files
    pci_stop_bus_device
    pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device
    <out-of-tree hotplug driver remove path>

I am aware that "out-of-tree driver re-enters teardown" is not by
itself a reason to take a change upstream, and I would understand a
NACK on that basis.  The reason I am still sending it is that the
fix is local, mechanical, matches an idiom already used elsewhere in
the kernel, and removes a class of bug rather than papering over the
specific caller that surfaced it.

Signed-off-by: Gianfranco Dutka <gianfranco.dutka@arista.com>
---
 drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
--- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
@@ -1228,11 +1228,13 @@ static void pci_remove_resource_files(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 		if (res_attr) {
 			sysfs_remove_bin_file(&pdev->dev.kobj, res_attr);
 			kfree(res_attr);
+			pdev->res_attr[i] = NULL;
 		}

 		res_attr = pdev->res_attr_wc[i];
 		if (res_attr) {
 			sysfs_remove_bin_file(&pdev->dev.kobj, res_attr);
 			kfree(res_attr);
+			pdev->res_attr_wc[i] = NULL;
 		}
 	}
 }
--
2.43.0

             reply	other threads:[~2026-05-20 21:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-20 21:13 Gianfranco Dutka [this message]
2026-05-20 22:45 ` Gianfranco Dutka
2026-05-21 11:54   ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2026-05-21 10:22 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-05-21 12:01   ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2026-05-21 12:04     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-05-21 11:59 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260520211306.3301893-1-gianfranco.dutka@arista.com \
    --to=gianfranco.dutka@arista.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®