From: Chun-Tse Shao <ctshao@google.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
namhyung@kernel.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
james.clark@linaro.org, sandipan.das@amd.com, leo.yan@arm.com,
thomas.falcon@intel.com, yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chun-Tse Shao <ctshao@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] perf stat: Fix uncore metric scaling across aggregation modes
Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 13:15:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260521201505.124690-1-ctshao@google.com> (raw)
This series fixes a scaling issue for metrics (like lpm_miss_lat) across
different runtime aggregation modes.
Uncore metrics currently use `source_count` to scale events. However,
`source_count` returns the total uncore unit count regardless of the
selected aggregation mode. When evaluating metrics in different
aggregation mode other than `--per-socket`, this incorrectly divides
aggregated uncore events against the total uncore count rather than the
uncores belonging to the aggregation, leading to wrong metric results.
To fix this, we:
1. Introduce the aggr_nr() keyword to the metric parser, which
dynamically resolves to the active units in the current aggregation
group (`gr->nr`).
2. Update the python metrics to use `aggr_nr` instead of `source_count`,
ensuring correct scaling across all runtime aggregation boundaries.
Before the fix (incorrect low latency in global mode):
$ perf stat -M lpm_miss_lat --metric-only -a -j -- sleep 1
{"ns lpm_miss_lat_rem" : "122.8", "ns lpm_miss_lat_loc" : "114.5"}
$ perf stat -M lpm_miss_lat --per-socket --metric-only -a -j -- sleep 1
{"socket" : "S0", "ns lpm_miss_lat_rem" : "232.1", "ns lpm_miss_lat_loc" : "278.2"}
{"socket" : "S1", "ns lpm_miss_lat_rem" : "233.9", "ns lpm_miss_lat_loc" : "257.5"}
After the fix (correct scaled latency in all aggregation modes):
$ perf stat -M lpm_miss_lat --metric-only -a -j -- sleep 1
{"ns lpm_miss_lat_rem" : "231.7", "ns lpm_miss_lat_loc" : "245.0"}
$ perf stat -M lpm_miss_lat --per-socket --metric-only -a -j -- sleep 1
{"socket" : "S0", "ns lpm_miss_lat_rem" : "238.3", "ns lpm_miss_lat_loc" : "249.4"}
{"socket" : "S1", "ns lpm_miss_lat_rem" : "259.1", "ns lpm_miss_lat_loc" : "253.1"}
v3:
Fixed based on Sashiko review:
- Removed the unnecessary, copied `redefined-builtin` pylint-disable
comment from `aggr_nr` definition inside `metric.py`.
v2: lore.kernel.org/20260521035941.3860145-1-ctshao@google.com
Fixed based on Sashiko review:
- Fixed `aggr_nr` setting when an uncore event fails to run
(counts.run == 0) to explicitly set it to 0 instead of defaulting to
1.
- Accumulated `aggr_nr` when multiple unmerged PMU events are
associated with the same metric ID to prevent incorrect scaling
across active sockets.
- Removed unused `List` import from `typing` in `intel_metrics.py`.
v1: lore.kernel.org/20260520180032.3045144-1-ctshao@google.com
Chun-Tse Shao (2):
perf stat: Add aggr_nr metric parser support
perf stat: Use aggr_nr scaling for Intel uncore miss latency metrics
tools/perf/pmu-events/intel_metrics.py | 6 +++---
tools/perf/pmu-events/metric.py | 9 +++++++--
tools/perf/util/expr.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
tools/perf/util/expr.h | 6 +++++-
tools/perf/util/expr.l | 1 +
tools/perf/util/expr.y | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c | 6 +++++-
7 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
--
2.54.0.746.g67dd491aae-goog
next reply other threads:[~2026-05-21 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-21 20:15 Chun-Tse Shao [this message]
2026-05-21 20:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] perf stat: Add aggr_nr metric parser support Chun-Tse Shao
2026-05-21 20:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] perf stat: Use aggr_nr scaling for Intel uncore miss latency metrics Chun-Tse Shao
2026-05-27 19:10 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] perf stat: Fix uncore metric scaling across aggregation modes Chen, Zide
2026-05-28 19:17 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-06-04 13:49 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260521201505.124690-1-ctshao@google.com \
--to=ctshao@google.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
--cc=yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome