From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>, NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>,
Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chris Mason <clm@meta.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] nfsd: avoid leaking pre-allocated openowner on unconfirmed retry race
Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 10:36:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260522-find_or_alloc_open_stateowner_unconfirmed_refcount_leak-v1-1-a66645e1e006@kernel.org> (raw)
When find_or_alloc_open_stateowner() encounters an unconfirmed owner, it
calls release_openowner() and sets oo = NULL. Control then falls through
past the `if (oo)` guard — which would have freed any pre-allocated
`new` — and unconditionally executes `new = alloc_stateowner(...)`. If
`new` was already allocated on a prior iteration, the pointer is
silently overwritten and the previous allocation (slab object + owner
name buffer) is leaked.
This requires a race: two NFSv4.0 OPEN threads with the same owner
string, where a concurrent thread inserts a new unconfirmed owner into
the hash between retry iterations. The window is narrow but repeatable
under adversarial conditions.
Fix by adding `goto retry` after `oo = NULL` so the already-allocated
`new` is reused on the next iteration rather than overwritten.
Fixes: 23df17788c62 ("nfsd: perform all find_openstateowner_str calls in the one place.")
Reported-by: Chris Mason <clm@meta.com>
Assisted-by: kres:claude-opus-4-6
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 2cf021b202a6..a42f34842d77 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -5276,6 +5276,7 @@ find_or_alloc_open_stateowner(unsigned int strhashval, struct nfsd4_open *open,
/* Replace unconfirmed owners without checking for replay. */
release_openowner(oo);
oo = NULL;
+ goto retry;
}
if (oo) {
if (new)
---
base-commit: 33e9ab952a864ae00bce7e47c3e9add1c4b3d3a3
change-id: 20260522-find_or_alloc_open_stateowner_unconfirmed_refcount_leak-997336e1ae1e
Best regards,
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next reply other threads:[~2026-05-22 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-22 14:36 Jeff Layton [this message]
2026-05-22 14:56 ` Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260522-find_or_alloc_open_stateowner_unconfirmed_refcount_leak-v1-1-a66645e1e006@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=clm@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®