From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>, Koba Ko <kobak@nvidia.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com>,
Cheng-Yang Chou <yphbchou0911@gmail.com>,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched_ext: Auto-register/unregister dl_server reservations
Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 10:36:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260522083655.GM3126523@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260521174509.1534623-2-arighi@nvidia.com>
On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 07:33:56PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> index 9c458552d14ff..15ba49fcba9af 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> @@ -6061,6 +6061,7 @@ static void scx_root_disable(struct scx_sched *sch)
> {
> struct scx_task_iter sti;
> struct task_struct *p;
> + bool was_switched_all;
> int cpu;
>
> /* guarantee forward progress and wait for descendants to be disabled */
> @@ -6087,6 +6088,13 @@ static void scx_root_disable(struct scx_sched *sch)
> */
> mutex_lock(&scx_enable_mutex);
>
> + /*
> + * Snapshot the full vs partial mode before clearing the static
> + * branch, so the dl_server re-balance below knows whether the
> + * fair_server reservation needs to be reinstated.
> + */
> + was_switched_all = scx_switched_all();
> +
> static_branch_disable(&__scx_switched_all);
> WRITE_ONCE(scx_switching_all, false);
>
> @@ -6136,10 +6144,24 @@ static void scx_root_disable(struct scx_sched *sch)
> /*
> * Invalidate all the rq clocks to prevent getting outdated
> * rq clocks from a previous scx scheduler.
> + *
> + * Also re-balance the dl_server bandwidth reservations: detach
> + * ext_server (no more sched_ext tasks) and reinstate fair_server
> + * if it was previously detached because we were running in full
> + * mode. Detach before attach to avoid a transient overflow of the
> + * root domain's bandwidth capacity.
> */
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> +
> scx_rq_clock_invalidate(rq);
> +
> + scoped_guard(rq_lock_irqsave, rq) {
> + dl_server_detach_bw(&rq->ext_server);
> + if (was_switched_all &&
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(dl_server_attach_bw(&rq->fair_server)))
> + pr_warn("failed to re-attach fair_server on CPU %d\n", cpu);
> + }
> }
>
> /* no task is on scx, turn off all the switches and flush in-progress calls */
> @@ -7314,6 +7336,27 @@ static void scx_root_enable_workfn(struct kthread_work *work)
> if (!(ops->flags & SCX_OPS_SWITCH_PARTIAL))
> static_branch_enable(&__scx_switched_all);
>
> + /*
> + * Re-balance the dl_server bandwidth reservations.
> + *
> + * In full mode (!SCX_OPS_SWITCH_PARTIAL) no task will ever run in
> + * the fair class, so detach the fair_server reservation and give
> + * that bandwidth back to the RT class. Always attach the
> + * ext_server reservation since sched_ext tasks are now possible.
> + *
> + * Detach before attach to avoid a transient overflow of the root
> + * domain's bandwidth capacity.
> + */
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> +
> + guard(rq_lock_irqsave)(rq);
> + if (scx_switched_all())
> + dl_server_detach_bw(&rq->fair_server);
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(dl_server_attach_bw(&rq->ext_server)))
> + pr_warn("failed to attach ext_server on CPU %d\n", cpu);
> + }
> +
> pr_info("sched_ext: BPF scheduler \"%s\" enabled%s\n",
> sch->ops.name, scx_switched_all() ? "" : " (partial)");
> kobject_uevent(&sch->kobj, KOBJ_ADD);
For switching *to* scx, I think it makes sense to attach ext_server
early and fail the switch if the attach fails. And only after the
switch, conditionally detach fair_server.
Since switching back to fair is a recovery path, this isn't really an
option -- the only actual option is keeping the fair_server reservation,
but that isn't ideal either.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-22 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-21 17:33 [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-7.2] sched_ext: Auto-manage ext/fair dl_server bandwidth Andrea Righi
2026-05-21 17:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched_ext: Auto-register/unregister dl_server reservations Andrea Righi
2026-05-22 8:36 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-05-22 10:02 ` Andrea Righi
2026-05-21 17:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/sched_ext: Validate dl_server attach/detach in total_bw test Andrea Righi
2026-05-26 8:27 [PATCHSET v2 sched_ext/for-7.2] sched_ext: Auto-manage ext/fair dl_server bandwidth Andrea Righi
2026-05-26 8:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched_ext: Auto-register/unregister dl_server reservations Andrea Righi
2026-05-26 16:42 [PATCHSET v3 sched_ext/for-7.2] sched_ext: Auto-manage ext/fair dl_server bandwidth Andrea Righi
2026-05-26 16:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched_ext: Auto-register/unregister dl_server reservations Andrea Righi
2026-05-28 11:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-28 16:13 ` Andrea Righi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260522083655.GM3126523@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=icheng@nvidia.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kobak@nvidia.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yphbchou0911@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®