From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Dmitry Ilvokhin <d@ilvokhin.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <djbw@kernel.org>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] cleanup: Annotate guard constructors with __nonnull()
Date: Sat, 23 May 2026 10:49:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260523084901.GF3102624@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0ab092c41e18e6a7db703547d87e6b632d6f79b2.1779286416.git.d@ilvokhin.com>
On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 07:18:03AM +0000, Dmitry Ilvokhin wrote:
> Add __nonnull() to unconditional guard constructors so the compiler
> warns when NULL is statically known to be passed:
>
> - DEFINE_GUARD(): re-declare the constructor with __nonnull().
> - __DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(): annotate the constructor directly.
>
> DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0() needs no annotation: its constructor takes no
> pointer arguments (.lock is hardcoded to (void *)1).
>
> Define the __nonnull() macro in compiler_attributes.h, following the
> existing convention for attribute wrappers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Ilvokhin <d@ilvokhin.com>
> Acked-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
The build robot found something to hate in this one. I think you're on
Cc there. It looks to me like clang-23 is confused somehow, but who
knows.
> ---
> include/linux/cleanup.h | 4 +++-
> include/linux/compiler_attributes.h | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/cleanup.h b/include/linux/cleanup.h
> index ea95ca4bc11c..8f8d588b5595 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cleanup.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cleanup.h
> @@ -397,6 +397,7 @@ static __maybe_unused const bool class_##_name##_is_conditional = _is_cond
> __DEFINE_GUARD_LOCK_PTR(_name, _T)
>
> #define DEFINE_GUARD(_name, _type, _lock, _unlock) \
> + static __always_inline __nonnull() _type class_##_name##_constructor(_type _T); \
> DEFINE_CLASS(_name, _type, if (_T) { _unlock; }, ({ _lock; _T; }), _type _T); \
> DEFINE_CLASS_IS_GUARD(_name)
>
> @@ -497,7 +498,8 @@ static __always_inline void class_##_name##_destructor(class_##_name##_t *_T) \
> __DEFINE_GUARD_LOCK_PTR(_name, &_T->lock)
>
> #define __DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(_name, _type, ...) \
> -static __always_inline class_##_name##_t class_##_name##_constructor(_type *l) \
> +static __always_inline __nonnull() \
> +class_##_name##_t class_##_name##_constructor(_type *l) \
> __no_context_analysis \
> { \
> class_##_name##_t _t = { .lock = l }, *_T = &_t; \
> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h b/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h
> index c16d4199bf92..10a1410eb3e2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler_attributes.h
> @@ -230,6 +230,12 @@
> */
> #define noinline __attribute__((__noinline__))
>
> +/*
> + * gcc: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Attributes.html#index-nonnull
> + * clang: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#nonnull
> + */
> +#define __nonnull(x...) __attribute__((__nonnull__(x)))
> +
> /*
> * Optional: only supported since gcc >= 8
> * Optional: not supported by clang
> --
> 2.53.0-Meta
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-23 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-21 7:18 [PATCH v4 0/4] cleanup: Remove NULL check from unconditional guards Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-05-21 7:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] nvdimm: Convert nvdimm_bus guard to class Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-05-21 7:18 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] genirq: Move NULL check into irqdesc_lock guard unlock expression Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-05-21 7:18 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] cleanup: Annotate guard constructors with __nonnull() Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-05-23 8:49 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-05-23 13:54 ` Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-05-26 15:13 ` Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-05-26 17:54 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-05-27 12:30 ` Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-05-21 7:18 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] cleanup: Remove NULL check from unconditional guards Dmitry Ilvokhin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260523084901.GF3102624@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=d@ilvokhin.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=djbw@kernel.org \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome