From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDF333BED78; Tue, 26 May 2026 18:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779819168; cv=none; b=H3jgJf0zXdJ94zwCOFvsEJRs5LOgedtwv3H4qMRJ3z8oBtkr1JUfxQZ38x3ETKBpU3xTdcCLEjpq5bpZnFD0V7mi7t70ucRu86hfZgpe1D3A2idxCYKmDJWkMLaDpoo5UqGegpAV98ITePLlXXazOVo7BLeGsra5UiVMm1sQlhk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779819168; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/AOziNIdHB9VXJDnMub1OWI8LVaCU4dkbjUTxh9RKmI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=p1i3RnVpaudwIDZpRB5wrqrDrWLXjXw8LsnoNWg+x7m7k9A6flpQU9kthfbYCa/wjNBb0Qnm085uD0EHKYjhUuUNs/hOn+fTkbU7rCEHDaiUxTHrM8QwZ/kBjMLCbWcsqP0S1u+7BhucjO5Ufi5tas14VxNnPA5OKkiMLLaNK14= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=j/tm/PMK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="j/tm/PMK" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C74F1F000E9; Tue, 26 May 2026 18:12:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1779819167; bh=5ngCoUCdLUTbdrymHOsCev6X6hH5iQoI3DmGS6ubV2s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=j/tm/PMK6+xds8mCajlHkpjxIdln5XEF/6vMWcOztxsauj1YR3ATmxVMine3MbaIr 18ADqFnZ5vyMr3g2fI2ATHMYtCdy6BpHvi3j6IqhI0isnTMraXyFLlQyOaeDiDCo2X gf1tys8RZWGoVuqNvkA4fesqF1kf6vFx/4mS1N2ATGABncvcZPrLCFwzynRAb1Yv10 wNnQW7AQFUY6vBX6t9C38qNM+9ouImx91LGPOKrQRb9Uha1kyyPzncAClj2O77Pkc1 BwaSViJRG/pCvr8LOwbOfuanKixf9gGBp4LquqcbtG+ToBhBdML4N2BbF8SnontwTb +23XpWM/w0rrg== Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 19:12:35 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: David Lechner Cc: Jyoti Bhayana , Nuno =?UTF-8?B?U8Oh?= , Andy Shevchenko , Nicolas Ferre , Alexandre Belloni , Claudiu Beznea , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Benson Leung , Guenter Roeck , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: pressure: cros_ec_baro: simplify timestamp channel definition Message-ID: <20260526191235.0a01be62@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: <3c12da03-6c62-4045-b831-e7b07c0ecb5d@baylibre.com> References: <20260525014654.2399354-1-dlechner@baylibre.com> <3c12da03-6c62-4045-b831-e7b07c0ecb5d@baylibre.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.4.0 (GTK 3.24.52; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 24 May 2026 20:49:11 -0500 David Lechner wrote: > On 5/24/26 8:46 PM, David Lechner wrote: > > Use IIO_CHAN_SOFT_TIMESTAMP() to define the timestamp channel instead of > > manually filling in the struct iio_chan_spec fields. This makes the code > > less verbose and mistake-prone. > > > FYI, there was a server error when doing b4 send, so this last patch > didn't get sent with the rest. I missed the [PATCH v2 9/9] when editing > it manually to send again. > > New and exciting way to confuse b4 :) Anyhow easy to work around with a -v 2 for the first lot and then it thinks this one is v3 anyway. Applied. Thanks, Jonathan