From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A250B2F7EE9 for ; Wed, 27 May 2026 20:40:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779914447; cv=none; b=oWimA4+iHhtCDUMLHaaFhTdEYexJwLBA2dPtf6B+PmHk0vRvW35p+alePxaL2CfN8CYW7aH6YXT9rq9rYSRaDy/qJ274zr5txuKGh98QAcBdVnDNQMYTOROuwBPgQNV4koTaMe/0wNVNDlleZbhPFGLdCugBjiVDxuHZ3sJUEyw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779914447; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BnrZxBVAYQ9Paq359s+XuIoSou7I1JZG7kC1BmhtSks=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=YEpSlpfqskLNx4WoRFsNUOUiw6ew1OqJoqmJr1RTRQ2pDHrQWhH+eT6HIYdUmqzH3p2emVXNV/dHvvyD4zsGLVqPHgV49ECheEP1YFImF7jsBxj/7t6YJRFeIa0YfWDWY4/Tla5MViPgXlVHvUezcA8ZM0mZgHLGe0X4oPxM4ZA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b=usZ7Emty; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b="usZ7Emty" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7C08C1F000E9; Wed, 27 May 2026 20:40:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1779914446; bh=K18ZCxw4OmGVcQ0DQtRnxx99q7AnNG+EcuunEAg1YDc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=usZ7Emty9g6yWezElWjkbxY5gG2vPSWN2SmNAW/t6XOowxIVuHJEGg7MhmhNz2psf ZdpRQDvC1Q4TmMS8x8XAEBcsLqVSPZMCf1K3lmJe/tkYKy+33r8Uu+xpUwZUrBfhCD DBfi9lycLqlCc3OqvLyxICV7Rfop+Q9pIuphWYmI= Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 13:40:45 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Kairui Song Cc: Shakeel Butt , linux-mm@kvack.org, Axel Rasmussen , Yuanchu Xie , Wei Xu , Johannes Weiner , David Hildenbrand , Michal Hocko , Lorenzo Stoakes , Barry Song , David Stevens , Chen Ridong , Leno Hou , Yafang Shao , Yu Zhao , Zicheng Wang , Baolin Wang , Kalesh Singh , Suren Baghdasaryan , Chris Li , Vernon Yang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Qi Zheng Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/15] mm/mglru: improve reclaim loop and dirty folio handling Message-Id: <20260527134045.0b697675a0d0641a24f08d0d@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20260428-mglru-reclaim-v7-0-02fabb92dc43@tencent.com> <20260526183506.ffb1bbe41043c6247557caa1@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 27 May 2026 13:36:06 +0800 Kairui Song wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 06:35:06PM +0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Mon, 11 May 2026 22:56:21 -0700 Shakeel Butt wrote: > > > > > > No worries, we have couple of weeks before the next merge window, so no urgency. > > > > Well, no, not really. Some schmuck wants to get our > > stable-non-rebasing branch into upstreamable shape well before the next > > merge window. > > > > This series was issued a month ago! > > > > Sorry to crack the whip, but let's please all be aware or our > > upstreaming timing. > > > > > I will go through the series in depth, hopefully there will not be a need for > > > next version and in that case, please just resend the cover letter with the > > > information you provided below and don't worry about the length of the cover > > > letter. > > > > That's a plan. > > > > Happily, MGRLU changes are well-isolated so I was able to trivially > > move this series to the tail of mm-unstable. > > > > It isn't a problem at all for me to defer this until the next cycle - > > please let me know. > > > > I'd like to know this as early as possible so I can hide the series > > until after -rc1. We shouldn't have "not for next merge window" > > material in there possibly invalidating our ongoing testing. > > Hi Andrew, > > >From my side I didn't see any major reason to block this. There has > been plenty of review and the series has been tested many times. I > also re-ran with more rounds, with CLRU baseline, and the numbers > are very close to what was already posted. OK... > But anyway, looking forward to Shakeel's review, and here is an > updated cover letter folding in the additions. There is not > much change: refreshed numbers, an "MGLRU disabled" (classical LRU) > row added to each benchmark, a short note on why each benchmark is > used, and three extra Link: tags. No code changes: Updated, thanks.