From: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 6/7] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix uncore_die_to_cpu() for offline dies
Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 08:11:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260527151154.130505-6-zide.chen@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260527151154.130505-1-zide.chen@intel.com>
If the die is offline when uncore_die_to_cpu() is called, it silently
returns 0, which is misleading. Return -1 in this case to indicate
that all CPUs on the die are offline and the caller can take care of
it accordingly.
Opportunistically, replace -EPERM with -ENODEV, as -ENODEV is
the appropriate error when no CPUs are online across all dies.
Signed-off-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c | 9 +++++++--
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
index 22256ded2d67..4b3a1fa5b41b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ int uncore_device_to_die(struct pci_dev *dev)
*/
int uncore_die_to_cpu(int die)
{
- int res = 0, cpu;
+ int res = -1, cpu;
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
if (topology_logical_die_id(cpu) == die) {
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
index 772b78237424..334dc384b5b9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
@@ -3772,12 +3772,17 @@ static void pmu_free_topology(struct intel_uncore_type *type)
static int skx_pmu_get_topology(struct intel_uncore_type *type,
int (*topology_cb)(struct intel_uncore_type*, int, int, u64))
{
- int die, ret = -EPERM;
+ int die, ret = -ENODEV;
u64 cpu_bus_msr;
+ int cpu;
cpus_read_lock();
for (die = 0; die < uncore_max_dies(); die++) {
- ret = skx_msr_cpu_bus_read(uncore_die_to_cpu(die), &cpu_bus_msr);
+ cpu = uncore_die_to_cpu(die);
+ if (cpu == -1)
+ continue;
+
+ ret = skx_msr_cpu_bus_read(cpu, &cpu_bus_msr);
if (ret)
break;
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-27 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-27 15:11 [PATCH V2 1/7] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix discovery unit lookup for multi-die systems Zide Chen
2026-05-27 15:11 ` [PATCH V2 2/7] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Guard against invalid box control address Zide Chen
2026-05-28 6:03 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-05-27 15:11 ` [PATCH V2 3/7] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix PCI device refcount leak in UPI discovery Zide Chen
2026-05-28 6:34 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-05-27 15:11 ` [PATCH V2 4/7] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Defer ADL global PMON enable to enable_box() Zide Chen
2026-05-28 6:35 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-05-28 18:07 ` Chen, Zide
2026-05-27 15:11 ` [PATCH V2 5/7] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Move die_to_cpu() to uncore.c Zide Chen
2026-05-28 6:36 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-05-29 10:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-27 15:11 ` Zide Chen [this message]
2026-05-28 6:38 ` [PATCH V2 6/7] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix uncore_die_to_cpu() for offline dies Mi, Dapeng
2026-05-27 15:11 ` [PATCH V2 7/7] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Implement global init callback for GNR uncore Zide Chen
2026-05-28 6:46 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-05-28 18:14 ` Chen, Zide
2026-05-29 8:47 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-05-29 10:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-29 15:03 ` Chen, Zide
2026-05-28 6:01 ` [PATCH V2 1/7] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix discovery unit lookup for multi-die systems Mi, Dapeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260527151154.130505-6-zide.chen@intel.com \
--to=zide.chen@intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®