mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "André Almeida" <andrealmeid@igalia.com>
To: "Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@kernel.org>,
	"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Florian Weimer" <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	"Rich Felker" <dalias@aerifal.cx>,
	"Torvald Riegel" <triegel@redhat.com>,
	"Darren Hart" <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	"Uros Bizjak" <ubizjak@gmail.com>,
	"Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-dev@igalia.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"André Almeida" <andrealmeid@igalia.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/5] arm64: vdso: Implement __vdso_futex_robust_try_unlock()
Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 13:33:54 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260529-tonyk-robust_arm-v3-2-a6f02684d4fe@igalia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260529-tonyk-robust_arm-v3-0-a6f02684d4fe@igalia.com>

Based on the x86 implementation, implement the vDSO function for unlocking
a robust futex correctly.

Commit xxxxxxxxxxxx ("x86/vdso: Implement __vdso_futex_robust_try_unlock()") has
the full explanation about why this mechanism is needed.

The unlock assembly sequence for arm64 is:

	__vdso_futex_robust_list64_try_unlock:
	retry:
		ldxr	w8, [x0] // Load the value from *futex
		cmp	w1, w8   // Compare with TID
		b.ne	__vdso_futex_list64_try_unlock_cs_end
		stlxr	w9, wzr, [x0] // Try to zero *futex
		cbnz	w9, retry
	__vdso_futex_list64_try_unlock_cs_start:
		str	xzr, [x2] // After zeroing *futex, zero *op_pending
	__vdso_futex_list64_try_unlock_cs_end>:

The decision regarding if the pointer should be cleared or not lies on checking
the condition flag zero:

	return (regs->user_regs.pstate & PSR_Z_BIT) ?
		(void __user *) regs->user_regs.regs[2] : NULL;

If it's not zero, that means that the comparassion worked and the kernel should
clear op_pending (if userspace didn't managed to) stored at x2.

Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@igalia.com>
---
Notes:
 - Only LL/SC for now but I can add LSE later if this looks good

v3:
 - Managed to get pop to always be stored at x2
---
 arch/arm64/Kconfig                    |  1 +
 arch/arm64/include/asm/futex_robust.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile       |  9 ++++++++-
 arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vfutex.c       | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/vdso/futex.h                  |  1 +
 5 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index 427151a9db7f..e10cb97a51c7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -249,6 +249,7 @@ config ARM64
 	select HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE
 	select HAVE_POSIX_CPU_TIMERS_TASK_WORK
 	select HAVE_FUNCTION_ARG_ACCESS_API
+	select HAVE_FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK
 	select MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE
 	select HAVE_RSEQ
 	select HAVE_RUST if RUSTC_SUPPORTS_ARM64
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/futex_robust.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/futex_robust.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..26b4006c4aeb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/futex_robust.h
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef _ASM_ARM64_FUTEX_ROBUST_H
+#define _ASM_ARM64_FUTEX_ROBUST_H
+
+#include <asm/ptrace.h>
+
+static __always_inline void __user *arm64_futex_robust_unlock_get_pop(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	/*
+	 * If Z bit is set then the ll/sc cmpxchg succeeded and the pending op
+	 * pointer needs to be cleared.
+	 */
+	return (regs->user_regs.pstate & PSR_Z_BIT) ?
+		(void __user *) regs->user_regs.regs[2] : NULL;
+}
+
+#define arch_futex_robust_unlock_get_pop(regs)	\
+	arm64_futex_robust_unlock_get_pop(regs)
+
+#endif /* _ASM_ARM64_FUTEX_ROBUST_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile
index 7dec05dd33b7..3c7f220fe783 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile
@@ -9,7 +9,8 @@
 # Include the generic Makefile to check the built vdso.
 include $(srctree)/lib/vdso/Makefile.include
 
-obj-vdso := vgettimeofday.o note.o sigreturn.o vgetrandom.o vgetrandom-chacha.o
+obj-vdso := vgettimeofday.o note.o sigreturn.o vgetrandom.o vgetrandom-chacha.o \
+	    vfutex.o
 
 # Build rules
 targets := $(obj-vdso) vdso.so vdso.so.dbg
@@ -45,9 +46,11 @@ CC_FLAGS_ADD_VDSO := -O2 -mcmodel=tiny -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
 
 CFLAGS_REMOVE_vgettimeofday.o = $(CC_FLAGS_REMOVE_VDSO)
 CFLAGS_REMOVE_vgetrandom.o = $(CC_FLAGS_REMOVE_VDSO)
+CFLAGS_REMOVE_vfutex.o = $(CC_FLAGS_REMOVE_VDSO)
 
 CFLAGS_vgettimeofday.o = $(CC_FLAGS_ADD_VDSO)
 CFLAGS_vgetrandom.o = $(CC_FLAGS_ADD_VDSO)
+CFLAGS_vfutex.o = $(CC_FLAGS_ADD_VDSO)
 
 ifneq ($(c-gettimeofday-y),)
   CFLAGS_vgettimeofday.o += -include $(c-gettimeofday-y)
@@ -57,6 +60,10 @@ ifneq ($(c-getrandom-y),)
   CFLAGS_vgetrandom.o += -include $(c-getrandom-y)
 endif
 
+ifneq ($(c-futex-y),)
+  CFLAGS_vfutex.o += -include $(c-futex-y)
+endif
+
 targets += vdso.lds
 CPPFLAGS_vdso.lds += -P -C -U$(ARCH)
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vfutex.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vfutex.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..3561b869d8bb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/vfutex.c
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+#include <linux/stringify.h>
+#include <vdso/futex.h>
+
+#define LABEL(name, sz) __stringify(__futex_list##sz##_try_unlock_cs_##name)
+
+#define GLOBLS(sz) ".globl " LABEL(start, sz) ", " LABEL(success, sz) ", " LABEL(end, sz) "\n"
+
+__u32 __vdso_futex_robust_list64_try_unlock(__u32 *lock, __u32 tid, __u64 *pop)
+{
+	register __u64 *pop_reg asm("x2") = pop;
+	__u32 val, result;
+
+	asm volatile (
+		GLOBLS(64)
+		"	prfm pstl1strm, %[lock]			\n"
+		"retry:						\n"
+		"	ldxr %w[val], %[lock]			\n"
+		"	cmp %w[tid], %w[val]			\n"
+		"	bne " LABEL(end, 64)"			\n"
+		"	stlxr %w[result], wzr, %[lock]		\n"
+		"	cbnz %w[result], retry			\n"
+		LABEL(start, 64)":				\n"
+		LABEL(success, 64)":				\n"
+		"	str xzr, %[pop_reg]			\n"
+		LABEL(end, 64)":				\n"
+
+		: [val] "=&r" (val), [result] "=&r" (result)
+		: [tid] "r" (tid), [lock] "Q" (*lock), [pop_reg] "Q" (*pop_reg)
+		: "memory"
+	);
+
+	return val;
+}
diff --git a/include/vdso/futex.h b/include/vdso/futex.h
index 3cd175eefe64..80934561a10d 100644
--- a/include/vdso/futex.h
+++ b/include/vdso/futex.h
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 
 #include <uapi/linux/types.h>
 
+
 /**
  * __vdso_futex_robust_list64_try_unlock - Try to unlock an uncontended robust futex
  *					   with a 64-bit pending op pointer

-- 
2.54.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-29 16:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-29 16:33 [PATCH v3 0/5] " André Almeida
2026-05-29 16:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] arm64: vdso: Prepare for robust futex unlock support André Almeida
2026-05-29 17:16   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-06-01 16:17     ` André Almeida
2026-05-29 16:33 ` André Almeida [this message]
2026-05-29 17:18   ` [PATCH v3 2/5] arm64: vdso: Implement __vdso_futex_robust_try_unlock() Thomas Weißschuh
2026-05-29 17:47   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-06-01 16:22     ` André Almeida
2026-05-29 16:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] selftests: futex: Add support for aarch64 in robust_list_critical André Almeida
2026-05-29 16:33 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] arm64: vdso32: Bring vdso32-offsets.h back André Almeida
2026-05-29 16:33 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] arm64: vdso32: Implement __vdso_futex_robust_try_unlock() André Almeida
2026-05-29 19:15   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-06-02  8:30   ` Thomas Weißschuh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260529-tonyk-robust_arm-v3-2-a6f02684d4fe@igalia.com \
    --to=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dalias@aerifal.cx \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=triegel@redhat.com \
    --cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®