From: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>
To: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>,
syzbot+69a3d7738ad3aa175caf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v3] eventpoll: fix use-after-free in clear_tfile_check_list()
Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 18:42:42 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260529131242.89876-1-kartikey406@gmail.com> (raw)
syzbot reports a slab-use-after-free read in clear_tfile_check_list()
during EPOLL_CTL_ADD when ep_insert() takes an error path that calls
ep_remove() before do_epoll_ctl_file() drains ctx->tfile_check_list.
ep_remove_file() decides whether to kmem_cache_free() a struct
epitems_head by testing v->next == NULL, on the convention that NULL
means "this head is not linked on any check list". list_file() pushes
a head onto ctx->tfile_check_list by storing the previous list head
into head->next; when the list is empty that store is NULL, so the
head that ends up at the tail of the check list also has next == NULL.
ep_remove_file() then misreads the tail as "not linked" and frees it.
clear_tfile_check_list() later walks the list and dereferences
head->next on the freed object:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in
clear_tfile_check_list+0x114/0x380 fs/eventpoll.c:2443
Allocated by task 5985:
ep_attach_file fs/eventpoll.c:1751 [inline]
ep_register_epitem fs/eventpoll.c:1833 [inline]
ep_insert+0x512/0x1820 fs/eventpoll.c:1876
Freed by task 5985:
ep_remove+0x155/0x2a0 fs/eventpoll.c:1135
ep_insert+0x1372/0x1820
Terminate ctx->tfile_check_list with EP_UNACTIVE_PTR (the existing
non-NULL sentinel used elsewhere in this file for inactive list
slots) so that next == NULL unambiguously means "not on any check
list". list_file() stores the sentinel when the list is empty,
reverse_path_check() and clear_tfile_check_list() stop the walk on
the sentinel, and do_epoll_ctl_file() seeds ctx->tfile_check_list
with it. The guard in ep_remove_file() then correctly refuses to
free a head while it remains on the check list.
Reported-by: syzbot+69a3d7738ad3aa175caf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=69a3d7738ad3aa175caf
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260523091107.61880-1-kartikey406@gmail.com/T/ [v1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260529042507.87593-1-kartikey406@gmail.com/T/ [v2]
Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>
---
v3: Drop the (struct epitems_head *) casts on EP_UNACTIVE_PTR.
void * converts implicitly to typed pointers in C; the casts
were noise.
v2: Reuse the existing EP_UNACTIVE_PTR sentinel instead of adding a
new EP_TFILE_LIST_END define, per review feedback.
---
fs/eventpoll.c | 15 +++++++++++----
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
index a569e98d4a99..1756c5f489a0 100644
--- a/fs/eventpoll.c
+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
@@ -472,7 +472,13 @@ static void list_file(struct file *file, struct ep_ctl_ctx *ctx)
head = container_of(file->f_ep, struct epitems_head, epitems);
if (!head->next) {
- head->next = ctx->tfile_check_list;
+ /*
+ * Terminate the check list with EP_UNACTIVE_PTR (non-NULL)
+ * so that head->next == NULL unambiguously means "not on
+ * any check list". ep_remove_file() relies on that
+ * invariant to decide whether the head is safe to free.
+ */
+ head->next = ctx->tfile_check_list ? : EP_UNACTIVE_PTR;
ctx->tfile_check_list = head;
}
}
@@ -1685,7 +1691,7 @@ static int reverse_path_check(struct ep_ctl_ctx *ctx)
{
struct epitems_head *p;
- for (p = ctx->tfile_check_list; p; p = p->next) {
+ for (p = ctx->tfile_check_list; p != EP_UNACTIVE_PTR; p = p->next) {
int error;
path_count_init(ctx);
rcu_read_lock();
@@ -2438,11 +2444,12 @@ static int ep_loop_check(struct ep_ctl_ctx *ctx, struct eventpoll *ep,
static void clear_tfile_check_list(struct ep_ctl_ctx *ctx)
{
rcu_read_lock();
- while (ctx->tfile_check_list) {
+ while (ctx->tfile_check_list != EP_UNACTIVE_PTR) {
struct epitems_head *head = ctx->tfile_check_list;
ctx->tfile_check_list = head->next;
unlist_file(head);
}
+ ctx->tfile_check_list = EP_UNACTIVE_PTR;
rcu_read_unlock();
}
@@ -2601,7 +2608,7 @@ int do_epoll_ctl_file(struct file *f, int op, struct epoll_key *tf,
int full_check;
struct eventpoll *ep;
struct epitem *epi;
- struct ep_ctl_ctx ctx = { };
+ struct ep_ctl_ctx ctx = { .tfile_check_list = EP_UNACTIVE_PTR };
/* The target file descriptor must support poll */
if (!file_can_poll(tf->file))
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-05-29 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-29 13:12 Deepanshu Kartikey [this message]
2026-06-21 8:15 ` Deepanshu Kartikey
2026-07-25 2:03 ` Deepanshu Kartikey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260529131242.89876-1-kartikey406@gmail.com \
--to=kartikey406@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+69a3d7738ad3aa175caf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®