From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bali.collaboradmins.com (bali.collaboradmins.com [148.251.105.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FC0B376A1C; Fri, 29 May 2026 17:10:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780074641; cv=none; b=lk/oN+XoCQyNOV2MLvGVIngjsqYGwreHWA2dAo5zqFECmqIpsna7x5ksu4zpM8GpUIcy63qiYwyQSPF2oe6wc28jKHwGQcJILioY+NZWBqHoDNaNj9pZd9iKQQBhhIkUCQxodhuISSAP2KJI2peGkfswIT22fRlIZfZ3roniOmk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780074641; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZuWhak9qN2sQ+tzY00zjhZkVc1vvwe4ZkcNwHcngSxQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=iCXbqH1ilql5pWncrbEu9g62J3PtChcfHOppejvz5EMPhe5MqMHT8YBJUlpF9YkcM63/RsRoRwKXPKGdGw08cRYk8z4AhLV9jZNC5baO6zIgi9GFICmqSVG3lNWN4OSantdeJgOtW0pvohVc0OdjM3hen3zJ9IChqT9kJZIHwMM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=WM+BvkeK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="WM+BvkeK" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1780074632; bh=ZuWhak9qN2sQ+tzY00zjhZkVc1vvwe4ZkcNwHcngSxQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=WM+BvkeKUOSrgN1rt+hTrXbLAWcWn4Pc3kfn5lBBQmBuOR+IQPLBMNiWP3QgYU8oC mq58Zx3JmkPY2NqM65Y+/dWq6RF7Gti3EbZBQ0fp/Jcu0OgBJmCP6AqyjrI/CseU/t 4JDG9p+eE4Yk2DUQ1sHKe0LNDwf8Ij1kzsRTJVetQY7wDRfsfplQi3VC3f4Gf0YJTW egr2mE+VOPb2gnymq1gExh9RSg0vXcNFHyZXiNlCdmbvkrI9/Uw8f/cZtBLZO+C+UK 4SeFusWJCyN65gPOD1OlJlcvkY2OCJ1yCtpkSu5NoVWqlhQeM3SO0qxipt09XxzHNu /0d+v5xH45avQ== Received: from fedora (unknown [100.64.0.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bbrezillon) by bali.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C8C917E0566; Fri, 29 May 2026 19:10:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 19:10:27 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: Laura Nao Cc: dakr@kernel.org, steven.price@arm.com, liviu.dudau@arm.com, matthew.brost@intel.com, thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, kernel@collabora.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Remove DRIVER_GEM_GPUVA feature flag Message-ID: <20260529191027.40e1ec5b@fedora> In-Reply-To: <20260421084701.24227-1-laura.nao@collabora.com> References: <20260421084701.24227-1-laura.nao@collabora.com> Organization: Collabora X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.4.0 (GTK 3.24.52; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, On Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:47:01 +0200 Laura Nao wrote: > The DRIVER_GEM_GPUVA feature flag is currently only used to control two > behaviors within the DRM core: > - calling drm_gem_gpuva_init() during > GEM object initialization > - creating the "gpuvas" debugfs entry > > drm_gem_gpuva_init() is a plain INIT_LIST_HEAD() and therefore is cheap > to run for every GEM object. The DRM_DEBUGFS_GPUVA_INFO macro is only > referenced by GPU-VA capable drivers, so clearing the feature bit does > not cause any unrelated drivers to get the "gpuvas" debugfs node. The > flag doesn't have any relevant purpose (e.g. gating ioctl handlers or MM > logic) and doesn't provide any practical benefit. > > Remove the flag definition and drop it from all drivers that use it, > call drm_gem_gpuva_init() unconditionally and clear the driver features > bit in DRM_DEBUGFS_GPUVA_INFO. > > Signed-off-by: Laura Nao > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 3 +-- > drivers/gpu/drm/imagination/pvr_drv.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c | 2 -- > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c | 1 - > drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_drv.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 2 +- > include/drm/drm_debugfs.h | 2 +- > include/drm/drm_drv.h | 6 ------ > include/drm/drm_gem.h | 3 --- > 9 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) I took the liberty to queue this one to drm-misc-next even though it was lacking R-b/A-b from Nouveau/Pvr maintainers because - it's pretty trivial - it's been posted more than a month ago - we need it to make progress on the Tyr side - if it's broken (I honestly doubt it), we still have a full release cycle to revert Regards, Boris