mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: seanjc@google.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] KVM: x86: small MMU-adjacent cleanups
Date: Sat, 30 May 2026 12:55:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260530165545.25599-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)

The non-MMU changes/preliminary cleanups from my "separate kvm_mmu"
series; fixed, test, and extracted for inclusion in 7.2.  The rest of
the series can be included later.

The meat here is in patches 2 and 3, which prepare for having a single
copy of the PDPTRs (in vcpu->arch) instead of two (in root_mmu and
nested_mmu).  This is then done in the last patch.

I have redone the nVMX patch now that Sean pointed out that the duplicate
write was a rebase goof.  I kept the nSVM one as is though.

v1->v2:
- rewritten "KVM: nVMX: remove unnecessary code in prepare_vmcs02_rare"
- added "KVM: x86/mmu: move pdptrs out of the MMU"

Thanks,

Paolo

Paolo Bonzini (5):
  KVM: x86: remove nested_mmu from mmu_is_nested()
  KVM: nVMX: remove unnecessary code in prepare_vmcs02_rare
  KVM: nSVM: invalidate cached PDPTRs across nested NPT transitions
  KVM: x86: check that kvm_handle_invpcid is only invoked with shadow
    paging
  KVM: x86/mmu: move pdptrs out of the MMU

 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  5 ++---
 arch/x86/kvm/kvm_cache_regs.h   | 12 ++++++++++--
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c       | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c          |  2 +-
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c       | 11 -----------
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c          | 20 ++++++++------------
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              |  9 ++++++---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.h              |  2 +-
 8 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

-- 
2.52.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-05-30 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-30 16:55 Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2026-05-30 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] KVM: x86: remove nested_mmu from mmu_is_nested() Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-30 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: nVMX: remove unnecessary code in prepare_vmcs02_rare Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-30 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: nSVM: invalidate cached PDPTRs across nested NPT transitions Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-30 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] KVM: x86: check that kvm_handle_invpcid is only invoked with shadow paging Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-30 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: x86/mmu: move pdptrs out of the MMU Paolo Bonzini
2026-06-12  8:47 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] KVM: x86: small MMU-adjacent cleanups Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260530165545.25599-1-pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®