From: Maoyi Xie <maoyixie.tju@gmail.com>
To: Jan Hoeppner <hoeppner@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Maoyi Xie <maoyixie.tju@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] s390/tape: avoid past-the-end iterator in tape_assign_minor()
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 12:08:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260601040818.1285976-1-maoyixie.tju@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260519100026.1970224-1-maoyixie.tju@gmail.com>
tape_assign_minor() walks tape_device_list to find the sorted
insertion point, then does list_add_tail(&device->node, &tmp->node).
When the loop runs to the end without break, tmp is past the end and
&tmp->node aliases the list head via container_of. list_add_tail then
appends at the tail, which is the intended result, but the iterator is
dereferenced past the end, which is undefined per the C standard.
Track the insertion point explicitly. insert_before starts at the list
head and is set to &tmp->node only when the loop breaks early. The
list_add_tail uses insert_before, so the behaviour is unchanged in
every case including an empty list.
Signed-off-by: Maoyi Xie <maoyixie.tju@gmail.com>
---
drivers/s390/char/tape_core.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/char/tape_core.c b/drivers/s390/char/tape_core.c
index bd8e3deb1199..361184c05940 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/char/tape_core.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/char/tape_core.c
@@ -330,14 +330,17 @@ __tape_cancel_io(struct tape_device *device, struct tape_request *request)
static int
tape_assign_minor(struct tape_device *device)
{
+ struct list_head *insert_before = &tape_device_list;
struct tape_device *tmp;
int minor;
minor = 0;
write_lock(&tape_device_lock);
list_for_each_entry(tmp, &tape_device_list, node) {
- if (minor < tmp->first_minor)
+ if (minor < tmp->first_minor) {
+ insert_before = &tmp->node;
break;
+ }
minor += TAPE_MINORS_PER_DEV;
}
if (minor >= 256) {
@@ -345,7 +348,7 @@ tape_assign_minor(struct tape_device *device)
return -ENODEV;
}
device->first_minor = minor;
- list_add_tail(&device->node, &tmp->node);
+ list_add_tail(&device->node, insert_before);
write_unlock(&tape_device_lock);
return 0;
}
--
2.34.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-01 4:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-19 10:00 s390/tape: iterator after loop end in tape_assign_minor? Maoyi Xie
2026-05-19 10:13 ` Heiko Carstens
2026-06-01 4:08 ` Maoyi Xie [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260601040818.1285976-1-maoyixie.tju@gmail.com \
--to=maoyixie.tju@gmail.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hoeppner@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®