From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
Cc: david@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, pfalcato@suse.de, r@hev.cc, jack@suse.cz,
Andrew Donnellan <andrew+kernel@donnellan.id.au>,
apopple@nvidia.com, baohua@kernel.org,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, brauner@kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com, kees@kernel.org,
kevin.brodsky@arm.com, lance.yang@linux.dev,
Liam R. Howlett <liam@infradead.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ljs@kernel.org, mhocko@suse.com, npache@redhat.com,
pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, rmclure@linux.ibm.com,
rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com, vbabka@kernel.org,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
ziy@nvidia.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, kas@kernel.org,
shakeel.butt@linux.dev, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/2] mm: improve large folio readahead for exec memory
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 16:10:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260601161026.d5905786bbd3a26d62be88c3@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260601102205.3985788-1-usama.arif@linux.dev>
On Mon, 1 Jun 2026 03:21:16 -0700 Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev> wrote:
> Hopefully this is the last revision. The only change from the previous
> revision is that the logic for deciding THP order was simplified and
> the max is now capped to 2M. Thanks Pedro and Jan for the suggestion
> and the dicusssion!
>
> The benchmark results on Neoverse V2 (Grace), arm64 with 64K base pages,
> 512MB executable file on ext4, averaged over 3 runs:
>
> Phase | Baseline | Patched | Improvement
> -----------|--------------|--------------|------------------
> Cold fault | 83.4 ms | 41.3 ms | 50% faster
> Random | 76.0 ms | 58.3 ms | 23% faster
>
> The patches are on top of mm-unstable from 28 May
> (8a74e22643189e0ae339afc91110ddb4cab1941b) which include patch [1]
> that make mmap_miss accounting symmetric for VM_SEQ_READ which was pointed
> out by sashiko in the previous revision.
We lost the [0/N] cover letter. Please do retain (and maintain!) that
across revisions. I used the one from the v6 patchset.
> v6 -> v7: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260528165635.2068012-1-usama.arif@linux.dev/
> - Simplify logic and just cap the max THP order to 2M (Pedro and Jan)
Here's how v7 altered mm.git:
mm/filemap.c | 15 +++++----------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/filemap.c~b
+++ a/mm/filemap.c
@@ -3320,17 +3320,12 @@ static struct file *do_sync_mmap_readahe
/* Use the readahead code, even if readahead is disabled */
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) && (vm_flags & VM_HUGEPAGE)) {
/*
- * Preserve PMD-sized readahead where it already fits in
- * the page cache. Otherwise cap the new fallback path at
- * 2MB: this is the common PMD-sized hugepage size, and it
- * avoids memory pressure from very large forced readahead
- * when mapping_max_folio_order() is high (for example,
- * 128MB with 64K base pages on arm64).
+ * Cap max THP order at 2MB: this is the common PMD-sized
+ * hugepage size, and it avoids memory pressure from very
+ * large forced readahead when mapping_max_folio_order() is
+ * high (for example, 128MB with 64K base pages on arm64).
*/
- if (HPAGE_PMD_ORDER <= MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER) {
- force_thp_readahead = true;
- thp_order = HPAGE_PMD_ORDER;
- } else if (mapping_large_folio_support(mapping)) {
+ if (mapping_large_folio_support(mapping)) {
force_thp_readahead = true;
thp_order = min_t(unsigned int,
mapping_max_folio_order(mapping),
_
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-01 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-01 10:21 Usama Arif
2026-06-01 10:21 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] mm: bypass mmap_miss heuristic for VM_EXEC readahead Usama Arif
2026-06-02 3:51 ` Oscar Salvador (SUSE)
2026-06-04 19:30 ` Pedro Falcato
2026-06-01 10:21 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] mm: use mapping_max_folio_order() for force_thp_readahead order Usama Arif
2026-06-01 16:22 ` Jan Kara
2026-06-04 19:33 ` Pedro Falcato
2026-06-01 23:10 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260601161026.d5905786bbd3a26d62be88c3@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrew+kernel@donnellan.id.au \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=r@hev.cc \
--cc=rmclure@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome