From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Aaron Lu <ziqianlu@bytedance.com>, Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] sched/fair: Use throttled_csd_list for local unthrottle
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2026 05:00:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260602050005.11160-3-kprateek.nayak@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260602050005.11160-1-kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
When distribute_cfs_runtime() encounters a local cfs_rq, it adds it to a
local list and unthrottles it at the end, when it is done unthrottling
other cfs_rq(s) on cfs_b->throttled_cfs_rq until the bandwidth runs out.
Instead of using a local list, reuse the local CPU's
rq->throttled_csd_list and the __cfsb_csd_unthrottle() path for
unthrottle.
If this is the first cfs_rq to be queued on the "throttled_csd_list", it
prevents the need for a remote CPUs to interrupt this local CPU if they
themselves are performing async unthrottle.
If this is not the first cfs_rq on the list, there is an async unthrottle
operation pending on this local CPU and the unthrottle can be batched
together.
No functional changes intended.
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Lu <ziqianlu@bytedance.com>
---
changelog v1..v2:
o Collected tags from Ben, and Aaron (Thanks a ton!)
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 32 +++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 766cd4395e6c..825393d3f039 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6962,12 +6962,11 @@ static void unthrottle_cfs_rq_async(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
static bool distribute_cfs_runtime(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
{
+ bool throttled = false, unthrottle_local = false;
int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
u64 runtime, remaining = 1;
- bool throttled = false;
- struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, *tmp;
+ struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
struct rq *rq;
- LIST_HEAD(local_unthrottle);
guard(rcu)();
@@ -7018,24 +7017,23 @@ static bool distribute_cfs_runtime(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
}
/*
- * We currently only expect to be unthrottling
- * a single cfs_rq locally.
+ * Allow a parallel async unthrottle to unthrottle
+ * this cfs_rq too via __cfsb_csd_unthrottle().
+ * If we are first, do it ourselves at the end and
+ * save on an IPI from remote CPUs.
*/
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&local_unthrottle));
- list_add_tail(&cfs_rq->throttled_csd_list, &local_unthrottle);
+ unthrottle_local = list_empty(&rq->cfsb_csd_list);
+ list_add_tail(&cfs_rq->throttled_csd_list, &rq->cfsb_csd_list);
}
- list_for_each_entry_safe(cfs_rq, tmp, &local_unthrottle,
- throttled_csd_list) {
- struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
-
- guard(rq_lock_irqsave)(rq);
-
- list_del_init(&cfs_rq->throttled_csd_list);
- if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
- unthrottle_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
+ if (unthrottle_local) {
+ /*
+ * Protect against an IPI that is also trying to flush
+ * the unthrottled cfs_rq(s) from this CPU's csd_list.
+ */
+ scoped_guard(irqsave)
+ __cfsb_csd_unthrottle(cpu_rq(this_cpu));
}
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&local_unthrottle));
return throttled;
}
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-02 5:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-02 5:00 [PATCH v2 0/5] sched/fair: Allow account_cfs_rq_runtime() to throttle current hierarchy K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-02 5:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] sched/fair: Convert cfs bandwidth throttling to use guards K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-04 18:45 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-02 5:00 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2026-06-04 18:45 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Use throttled_csd_list for local unthrottle tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-02 5:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] sched/fair: Call update_curr() before unthrottling the hierarchy K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-04 18:45 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-02 5:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] sched/fair: Move the throttled tasks to a local list in tg_unthrottle_up() K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-04 18:45 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-02 5:25 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] sched/fair: Unify cfs_rq throttling via account_cfs_rq_runtime() K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-02 7:10 ` [PATCH v2.1 " K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-04 18:45 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260602050005.11160-3-kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=ziqianlu@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®