From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C94F8407CDC; Fri, 5 Jun 2026 06:42:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780641773; cv=none; b=Jkue0OgELnCFFixVacyxA54xIJc2TTUbzzU/zWYcm1z/8o1ar3kjOjKJoVTCCKl9Tm81ZHaZs54gfltw3mPsRpfEaV0r6ilX1yQdjoXcT1vTwCra0wufeUrIvXLAC1hXrcnA3wRJSCwguCfTdRtMnhJAvCUDepLRQUo1fySObWQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780641773; c=relaxed/simple; bh=eGbh8JQN2INp1KoTkB642uAUvJfBZoDnj6oV23Wz/mw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=pcC1y6V8svnE3Kz8XTQCQw9IUmCcip4YqqV3Otay58opdMKaCwLxG2vLDZZh52LMbzaC0mr/BVk7mCAF79JgnJr7GkqC4+vnyIL5T2Ed8iUi35P63z6+LtF2FamUdCxptPJyEcz/jARjXBW5Dnf6H703i+NRNT4nEf5H5ORDsPk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=yNJbjXT2; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=NhqmnaXg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="yNJbjXT2"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="NhqmnaXg" Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2026 08:42:50 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1780641771; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=eGbh8JQN2INp1KoTkB642uAUvJfBZoDnj6oV23Wz/mw=; b=yNJbjXT2KsgESaNZCb+ZR0s/7hHIltWbF0OkKmn15qVUId++x7sElixiDzuv6mGIrZWVTE 6rzA7uETdKlfLHb3WQjPnVbg+jTtMp1VWKytJOXkMMBXnUYbvKxUVZY7Ju+cVAZuoVQ/MG 4A3Zcei8aelTdjoVRLpSCbAPae5D0INZuMKVcOeImlsOskrfmn73+TDueesY7m9XVLwvU8 CoxUj4IV+PfBFMgnTfKs6p6jv6I7Ar/r7UhHpSVUNWczjhhp0RtS1yt4wYLYK0jhrVKar0 RbygPmIhjnAm1Km6lOgw0txN4EQOtfz5UEI70rNU4DPZm7Qlm1Su7jckoyPoHw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1780641771; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=eGbh8JQN2INp1KoTkB642uAUvJfBZoDnj6oV23Wz/mw=; b=NhqmnaXgTEnWRMyqKvCX7hQwuhr1azkjZNHcU7J90WIfcV3m9a1x8jV39S6v5uWz6j0kuG 0hgLXUIo+RM03nCg== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Jonas Jelonek Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Clark Williams , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Gleixner , Jiayuan Chen , linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: smp: report dying CPU to RCU in stop_this_cpu() Message-ID: <20260605064250.q0aRKkon@linutronix.de> References: <20260604182407.3109536-1-jelonek.jonas@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20260604182407.3109536-1-jelonek.jonas@gmail.com> On 2026-06-04 18:24:07 [+0000], Jonas Jelonek wrote: =E2=80=A6 > This issue popped up during kernel bump downstream in OpenWrt from > 6.18.33 to 6.18.34, since the suspected change has been backported to > 6.18 stable branch [1]. I would avoid the link and simply write after the backport of the patch or so. > Call rcutree_report_cpu_dead() once interrupts are disabled, mirroring the > generic CPU-hotplug offline path (and arm64's stop handling), so RCU stops > waiting on the parked CPUs and grace periods can still complete. This is part of cpuhp_report_idle_dead(). Is it now invoked twice? Or is something else missing/ different?=20 Sebastian