mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: luoliang@kylinos.cn
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Use task_on_rq_migrating() helper
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2026 10:01:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260608080156.GA3102624@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260608065307.280995-1-luoliang@kylinos.cn>

On Mon, Jun 08, 2026 at 02:53:07PM +0800, luoliang@kylinos.cn wrote:
> From: Liang Luo <luoliang@kylinos.cn>
> 
> Replace the open-coded "p->on_rq == TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING" comparisons
> in enqueue_task_dl() and dequeue_task_dl() with the existing
> task_on_rq_migrating() helper, consistent with the rest of the
> scheduler code.
> 
> The helper uses READ_ONCE() when loading ->on_rq, which was added by
> commit c546951d9c93 ("sched/core: Use READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() in
> move_queued_task()/task_rq_lock()") for LKMM compliance.  As documented
> in that commit, move_queued_task() synchronizes with task_rq_lock():
> 
>   move_queued_task()                task_rq_lock()
>   [S] ->on_rq = MIGRATING          [L] rq = task_rq()
>   WMB (__set_task_cpu())           ACQUIRE (rq->lock)
>   [S] ->cpu = new_cpu              [L] ->on_rq
> 
> The READ_ONCE() on the ->on_rq load ensures proper pairing with the
> WRITE_ONCE() on the writer side.  The open-coded checks in deadline.c
> lack this annotation.
> 
> No functional change.

This is completely irrelevant here. p->on_rq is set with rq->lock held,
and tasks are {en,de}queued with rq->lock held. There is no concurrency.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-08  8:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-08  6:53 luoliang
2026-06-08  7:10 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-08  7:55 ` [PATCH v2] " luoliang
2026-06-09  8:32   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Liang Luo
2026-06-08  8:01 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-06-09  5:52   ` [PATCH] " luoliang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260608080156.GA3102624@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luoliang@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome