From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A927736657B; Fri, 12 Jun 2026 09:45:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781257555; cv=none; b=WACWWD8qupbbb2BGuiaUn968SB6isd849loVKdYpC/rCezH2s6iJyQNb6+LBzEGNI/cfcFYL1vNz1jcdX6+UGMpSRdjZza55vWxF7ub7sTjxK5LNIc6XA79rLepVF2ecp0hGDMmCBuej6BON7ZkpnyvkWvNJ51gpTWk+/mRr/V0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781257555; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5kZYGlAIeZV0FMnxTw7YDi5SkMcsdsV5OoS4J4WqUhw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=cB3YYO4YHHrypzUKSDHem7JyoKqwR8U9r+nsPXUdOo/g31bOQtJMkP8dsCBP12e/oOc3R6hfnAsHXk+FoSk+wqvweqKPkU3cGTyZyIg4rVt61POMUywImseggioL11iEDMbvBYzEONbhQhCRXXdjCpbIYLC9RH3LDDOgjnq3cpA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=eD0RBu9b; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="eD0RBu9b" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1781257554; x=1812793554; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=5kZYGlAIeZV0FMnxTw7YDi5SkMcsdsV5OoS4J4WqUhw=; b=eD0RBu9bwRYnNWh+qQoO7sankAGw9m1EP50hbHA1iTQSXui4G1RI0qQ6 /KWAwFpPYP2SSZ4K4cPggt2AsWgoONhAzvbjIzyBxpbYTs7Td4seO+XAT elF9UUkVJMfYzpJkZFomiLCZ5+RWQbOXy1QrTDmgIpvqanHMBcJXtM4wk Y43D28cf61eJQ+7cqn4DzTnziNIbSjZdCHr6FqaLOVXB8wCrzqAWXry/a DuHmlEqd3CYsGbzIPczl5m2OQftGP4VcL/eRVEFBYsskY6NLKjWz9H+WC oBfphyh1Lits20rIh6f2Nl2BV1YDfsSc23Sq4fG405X3XxgLmxtMqG9sW A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: XazpO8uESweiLnUpBRdD6A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Ry12DRWaSXG8/2GglOfLyg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11813"; a="81992484" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,200,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="81992484" Received: from fmviesa004.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.144]) by orvoesa113.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Jun 2026 02:45:53 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: XwyvusprSpCsORDhyLtpDQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: vltGDbzWR7+p4T3OmRE3wQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,200,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="248664732" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO f0d55cb201f0) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Jun 2026 02:45:51 -0700 Received: from kbuild by f0d55cb201f0 with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wXySS-00000000OZl-3xFe; Fri, 12 Jun 2026 09:45:48 +0000 Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 17:45:39 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Kyle Zeng , jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christian Brauner , Dave Kleikamp , outbounddisclosures@openai.com, Kyle Zeng , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] jfs: validate active AG before updating db_active Message-ID: <202606121758.6bifYIqm-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260611212956.10206-1-kylebot@openai.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260611212956.10206-1-kylebot@openai.com> Hi Kyle, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on brauner-vfs/vfs.all] [also build test ERROR on linus/master kleikamp-shaggy/jfs-next v7.1-rc7 next-20260611] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Kyle-Zeng/jfs-validate-active-AG-before-updating-db_active/20260612-054255 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git vfs.all patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260611212956.10206-1-kylebot%40openai.com patch subject: [PATCH] jfs: validate active AG before updating db_active config: s390-randconfig-002-20260612 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260612/202606121758.6bifYIqm-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: s390-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.5.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260612/202606121758.6bifYIqm-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606121758.6bifYIqm-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): fs/jfs/file.c: In function 'jfs_get_active_ag': >> fs/jfs/file.c:52:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'jfs_error'; did you mean 'xas_error'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] jfs_error(inode->i_sb, ^~~~~~~~~ xas_error cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +52 fs/jfs/file.c 43 44 static int jfs_get_active_ag(struct inode *inode, int *agp) 45 { 46 struct jfs_inode_info *ji = JFS_IP(inode); 47 struct jfs_sb_info *sbi = JFS_SBI(inode->i_sb); 48 struct bmap *bmap = sbi->bmap; 49 u64 ag = BLKTOAG(addressPXD(&ji->ixpxd), sbi); 50 51 if (ag >= bmap->db_numag) { > 52 jfs_error(inode->i_sb, 53 "inode %lu has invalid active ag %llu\n", 54 inode->i_ino, (unsigned long long)ag); 55 return -EIO; 56 } 57 58 *agp = ag; 59 return 0; 60 } 61 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki