From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay <devnull+hexlabsecurity.proton.me@kernel.org>
Cc: hexlabsecurity@proton.me, "Remi Buisson" <remi.buisson@tdk.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: imu: inv_icm45600: clamp the device-reported FIFO sample count
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2026 14:45:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260614144557.196a5c4c@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260613-b4-disp-58b984f3-v1-1-352b2f925f58@proton.me>
On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 17:46:47 -0500
Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay <devnull+hexlabsecurity.proton.me@kernel.org> wrote:
> From: Bryam Vargas <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
>
> inv_icm45600_buffer_fifo_read() takes the number of samples to fetch from
> the device's FIFO_COUNT register and uses it, unclamped, as the length of a
> regmap_noinc_read() into the fixed 8 KiB st->fifo.data buffer:
>
> fifo_nb = le16_to_cpup(raw_fifo_count);
> ...
> if (max > 0 && fifo_nb > max)
> fifo_nb = max;
> st->fifo.count = fifo_nb * packet_size;
> regmap_noinc_read(st->map, INV_ICM45600_REG_FIFO_DATA,
> st->fifo.data, st->fifo.count);
>
> The only bound on fifo_nb is "max", but the interrupt handler calls
> inv_icm45600_buffer_fifo_read(st, 0), so on that path the clamp is
> skipped. A malfunctioning or malicious device (a counterfeit or
> compromised IMU, or a bus interposer) can then report up to 65535 in
> FIFO_COUNT, making fifo_nb * packet_size (16 bytes per packet) as large
> as ~1 MiB and overflowing the 8 KiB st->fifo.data heap buffer with
> device-controlled data.
>
> Clamp fifo_nb to the buffer capacity (INV_ICM45600_FIFO_SIZE_MAX /
> packet_size), mirroring the existing watermark cap in
> inv_icm45600_wm_truncate() and the sibling inv_icm42600 driver, which
> bounds its FIFO count to the buffer size. The clamp is a no-op for
> well-behaved hardware, whose FIFO never exceeds the buffer size.
>
> Fixes: 06674a72cf7a ("iio: imu: inv_icm45600: add buffer support in iio devices")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Similar comments to the earlier patch. Not a fix - rather this is nice to have
hardening against devices doing something odd. I don't want to open the can of
worms that would be suggesting we fully audit drivers against this stuff
(particularly as I suspect that AI bots will be very good at finding complex
chains of things that happen if the hardware replies with garbage).
Same thing about min() rather than min_t() below. It is pretty rare in
modern times to need min_t()
Jonathan
> Signed-off-by: Bryam Vargas <hexlabsecurity@proton.me>
> ---
> Reproduced with an in-kernel KASAN litmus mirroring the exact allocation and
> the FIFO_COUNT -> regmap_noinc_read() length computation, plus a userspace
> AddressSanitizer model for the full magnitude:
>
> Without this patch (device FIFO_COUNT = 0x208 = 520 packets -> 8320 bytes):
> BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds ... Write of size 8320
> ... the buggy address belongs to the cache kmalloc-8k of size 8192
> ... located 0 bytes inside of allocated 8192-byte region
> With this patch (count clamped to 8192 bytes): clean, no KASAN report.
> ASan model at the full magnitude (FIFO_COUNT = 0xFFFF -> 1048560 bytes):
> AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow WRITE of size 1048560,
> 0 bytes after the 8192-byte region (reproduces on 64- and 32-bit).
>
> The sibling inv_icm42600 driver bounds its FIFO count to the buffer size on
> the same interrupt path (max == 0 -> max_count = sizeof(st->fifo.data)); this
> restores the equivalent guard for inv_icm45600.
>
> Reproducer and full logs available on request.
> ---
> drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm45600/inv_icm45600_buffer.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm45600/inv_icm45600_buffer.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm45600/inv_icm45600_buffer.c
> index 2b9ea317385c..0021c3dc0888 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm45600/inv_icm45600_buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm45600/inv_icm45600_buffer.c
> @@ -422,6 +422,9 @@ int inv_icm45600_buffer_fifo_read(struct inv_icm45600_state *st,
> if (max > 0 && fifo_nb > max)
> fifo_nb = max;
>
> + /* Limit to the internal buffer capacity; the count is device-provided. */
> + fifo_nb = min_t(size_t, fifo_nb, INV_ICM45600_FIFO_SIZE_MAX / packet_size);
> +
> /* Try to read all FIFO data in internal buffer. */
> st->fifo.count = fifo_nb * packet_size;
> ret = regmap_noinc_read(st->map, INV_ICM45600_REG_FIFO_DATA,
>
> ---
> base-commit: 8e65320d91cdc3b241d4b94855c88459b91abf66
> change-id: 20260613-b4-disp-58b984f3-3eef009c483c
>
> Best regards,
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-14 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-13 22:46 Bryam Vargas via B4 Relay
2026-06-14 13:45 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260614144557.196a5c4c@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=devnull+hexlabsecurity.proton.me@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=hexlabsecurity@proton.me \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=remi.buisson@tdk.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®