From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Subject: drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:1122:38: sparse: sparse: cast from restricted __le64
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 10:27:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202606151017.QU0evpH9-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
head: 8cd9520d35a6c38db6567e97dd93b1f11f185dc6
commit: 7cad800485956a263318930613f8f4a084af8c70 iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Mark EATS_TRANS safe when computing the update sequence
date: 5 months ago
config: arm64-randconfig-r123-20260614 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260615/202606151017.QU0evpH9-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.4.0
sparse: v0.6.5-rc1
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260615/202606151017.QU0evpH9-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Fixes: 7cad80048595 ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Mark EATS_TRANS safe when computing the update sequence")
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606151017.QU0evpH9-lkp@intel.com/
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:1101:17: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different base types) @@ expected restricted __le64 const [usertype] eats_s1chk @@ got unsigned long long @@
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:1101:17: sparse: expected restricted __le64 const [usertype] eats_s1chk
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:1101:17: sparse: got unsigned long long
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:1103:17: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different base types) @@ expected restricted __le64 const [usertype] eats_trans @@ got unsigned long long @@
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:1103:17: sparse: expected restricted __le64 const [usertype] eats_trans
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:1103:17: sparse: got unsigned long long
>> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:1122:38: sparse: sparse: cast from restricted __le64
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:1124:33: sparse: sparse: cast from restricted __le64
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c: note: in included file (through arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h, include/linux/atomic.h, include/asm-generic/bitops/atomic.h, ...):
arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:168:1: sparse: sparse: cast truncates bits from constant value (ffffffff80000000 becomes 0)
arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:168:1: sparse: sparse: cast truncates bits from constant value (ffffffff80000000 becomes 0)
vim +1122 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
1095
1096 VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT
1097 void arm_smmu_get_ste_update_safe(const __le64 *cur, const __le64 *target,
1098 __le64 *safe_bits)
1099 {
1100 const __le64 eats_s1chk =
1101 FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_EATS, STRTAB_STE_1_EATS_S1CHK);
1102 const __le64 eats_trans =
1103 FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_EATS, STRTAB_STE_1_EATS_TRANS);
1104
1105 /*
1106 * When an STE changes EATS_TRANS, the sequencing code in the attach
1107 * logic already will have the PCI cap for ATS disabled. Thus at this
1108 * moment we can expect that the device will not generate ATS queries
1109 * and so we don't care about the sequencing of EATS. The purpose of
1110 * EATS_TRANS is to protect the system from hostile untrusted devices
1111 * that issue ATS when the PCI config space is disabled. However, if
1112 * EATS_TRANS is being changed, then we must have already trusted the
1113 * device as the EATS_TRANS security block is being disabled.
1114 *
1115 * Note: now the EATS_TRANS update is moved to the first entry_set().
1116 * Changing S2S and EATS might transiently result in S2S=1 and EATS=1
1117 * which is a bad STE (see "5.2 Stream Table Entry"). In such a case,
1118 * we can't do a hitless update. Also, it should not be added to the
1119 * safe bits with STRTAB_STE_1_EATS_S1CHK, because EATS=0b11 would be
1120 * effectively an errant 0b00 configuration.
1121 */
> 1122 if (!((cur[1] | target[1]) & cpu_to_le64(eats_s1chk)) &&
1123 !((cur[2] | target[2]) & cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_2_S2S)))
1124 safe_bits[1] |= cpu_to_le64(eats_trans);
1125
1126 /*
1127 * MEV does not meaningfully impact the operation of the HW, it only
1128 * changes how many fault events are generated, thus we can relax it
1129 * when computing the ordering. The spec notes the device can act like
1130 * MEV=1 anyhow:
1131 *
1132 * Note: Software must expect, and be able to deal with, coalesced
1133 * fault records even when MEV == 0.
1134 */
1135 safe_bits[1] |= cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_1_MEV);
1136 }
1137 EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(arm_smmu_get_ste_update_safe);
1138
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next reply other threads:[~2026-06-15 2:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-15 2:27 kernel test robot [this message]
2026-06-19 14:31 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202606151017.QU0evpH9-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®