From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f174.google.com (mail-pl1-f174.google.com [209.85.214.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CC8E35F199 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 11:01:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.174 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781607688; cv=none; b=BL5AUMEkRrWO6+Vl612Vbms327r8gtvXZDJ2xSJufygUS0kwDq1qJYwiZHOLneGw3mOWjXuH91a1Wyi/WBPG5GuN3FyRLWCLjQ/HWY+vTiyg8T2kPd9JSYc6DaSB8Xnneroom8wfBv4toDqXbgY2rd9MOk3SRdj3Wy5+qadJ4Ys= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781607688; c=relaxed/simple; bh=50F751gF+rXlNIyRBoGhHlcoVou6MOxU7OCNopSBl7E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=qIDL87qvOlO+JXwDpR6e3F5sSOnHzsCojMO85TgLWkAhxrfHgj8bsdZEg1dQTS5Xqwbld0kRterh7WpO8T7EdNXFbE4lkbFc24w+olUb2ZB87zObJ/ByB64zgzXO5AUaWtdyd4Wuaix6OtVAD8JXrZSDKtUgsGEfG7VglYj99W8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=Q7wm4ILB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.174 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Q7wm4ILB" Received: by mail-pl1-f174.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2bf77d4a4e2so25555365ad.1 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 04:01:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1781607687; x=1782212487; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=7WqqUitEfH9e229osynsO1JlKCUb6fQkndIHrjVVsHs=; b=Q7wm4ILBI24O5sIPQ36ym7TopcAP8MiaMeuz48+STH2ClqUw45vgR2ydiN3QZwceUv UeJmnWLsq79m1mRO0jzKSlf49Xah89StoNJxSOgmWNPK8G09RBqwwFo1Y7xq/SFE11hm AV7Y3fB63+QS/3DDC5X6PKYMfvg0SoTti2FwDxc7/nzGeN1ZKDJ9WgCgu70F+pgRGeo2 AZUgTBes0VaxjJ0dPFxxvkIHcgIejzWTy7jyPunoTqUFRm/xPPkvrSjqI9Rw64Bdi7UD TwPcUB0to6ZRx0LlbwIjK/HZgvvZOYDj8KDdf3wHU8lIcB4crYxTt208PyodHrZ3HYA4 Qq2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1781607687; x=1782212487; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7WqqUitEfH9e229osynsO1JlKCUb6fQkndIHrjVVsHs=; b=lsfbXQ9GS87dxlA6pto+VesbHnlLm6ghZDYl6SJpyXHt8tjNFIDsUGDgIPw5Ib+1hP VPzltBpKB8WQkxERPkb4X+LJ1671bQhhIyOu7XTnx+xC2FKWbug4s4VFeM6TGYsdfO9O ZGxD1RQe4gEEcWFolsym2MTtLTsSOV2CW8xIu6vAdDNmvdg7D1ElFSQ61CFDgUGMibQf QhtbUvzpJYuyeK/y2WTx/DsRoaVklHVaVnicbg943vJA6sGyO9n6MWAjWexLJxNMhSuC cNaQRCmArQsXHHWmBtK25Isaxe1YlGKe8hf66aAsFR4EWuOTbYSFPBvhfrS8Cvx0J5lO rizQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ8CrDV7V7QEs1li3WxwtYbU+cFnzUtXfYOfRMXnZDT92Y5TV2WMJd7uaGzW+6R3wq82Qkzjh7Bl2Yy+qmI=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyDOX5tLoKJ+fYtAyV79z4B6s7XWtPcyjLA7xhxKAOhbzzTXl5d 5fSAGM7BE/22MBopTzqpuMEkWjAdX3Tc8i6Oxhem35J5KHFMYrM2f/5O X-Gm-Gg: Acq92OFQ4oXyyrUckl6epUG8Y4hKIN085JFPspuuCUJO/tF+O27qY5p+FNgu91LatFv JdmaaEBbGU1EM+qK+6GcnMcJh3A312ynFVp9trkBWeQ9H4Doga0sBTxv/SBycJkKnuQpBVZUHsV jQZ52BNnxg5MDs+gFFfAt+tsz+e9VqKUR6bD9YnLdHokSQKNuYntDuh4f0Afm3kUL2LMEj/SXF8 FnS/dXc/5p3dzfytY/kc/CX9AbxMRxNTkpLbcendlyO9Xrkz1XY/u3hzMAJjNvKNv26L1DhE8YV Mm8CKP+2kw+g1oMp8SFtKi1kDc2O2jrr/yPSI/9MNQ2bvjN3SBAoHpShcruAxvsUXBxXLYUgwKv Krp6yXXHz7IyIFMr9GATAadf8hm0kIbRLbeE1tvwl1JKmETdOvpAv/s2hR8N3CFTAhy5vDQPggr J/zksJs/X7rpNyeUHJ/9WPxkE= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c943:b0:2c6:af4b:99a1 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2c6af4b9fa3mr404925ad.3.1781607686842; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 04:01:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fedora ([103.51.149.90]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-2c42f2e52a9sm132561995ad.11.2026.06.16.04.01.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 16 Jun 2026 04:01:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Subhrojyoti Bala To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Subhrojyoti Bala Subject: [PATCH 4/5] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix multi-line comment style in rtw_mlme.h Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 16:30:47 +0530 Message-ID: <20260616110048.45541-5-subhrojyoti0609@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.54.0 In-Reply-To: <20260616110048.45541-1-subhrojyoti0609@gmail.com> References: <20260616110048.45541-1-subhrojyoti0609@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Block comment was not using * on subsequent lines and had blank lines inside the comment body. Fix it to comply with kernel coding style. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Subhrojyoti Bala --- drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_mlme.h | 33 ++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_mlme.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_mlme.h index dbb523c8a58b..59b12d9daa71 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_mlme.h +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_mlme.h @@ -67,23 +67,22 @@ enum { }; /* - -there are several "locks" in mlme_priv, -since mlme_priv is a shared resource between many threads, -like ISR/Call-Back functions, the OID handlers, and even timer functions. - -Each struct __queue has its own locks, already. -Other items in mlme_priv are protected by mlme_priv.lock, while items in -xmit_priv are protected by xmit_priv.lock. - -To avoid possible dead lock, any thread trying to modifying mlme_priv -SHALL not lock up more than one locks at a time! - -The only exception is that queue functions which take the __queue.lock -may be called with the xmit_priv.lock held. In this case the order -MUST always be first lock xmit_priv.lock and then call any queue functions -which take __queue.lock. -*/ + * There are several "locks" in mlme_priv, + * since mlme_priv is a shared resource between many threads, + * like ISR/Call-Back functions, the OID handlers, and even timer functions. + * + * Each struct __queue has its own locks, already. + * Other items in mlme_priv are protected by mlme_priv.lock, while items in + * xmit_priv are protected by xmit_priv.lock. + * + * To avoid possible dead lock, any thread trying to modifying mlme_priv + * SHALL not lock up more than one locks at a time! + * + * The only exception is that queue functions which take the __queue.lock + * may be called with the xmit_priv.lock held. In this case the order + * MUST always be first lock xmit_priv.lock and then call any queue functions + * which take __queue.lock. + */ struct sitesurvey_ctrl { u64 last_tx_pkts; -- 2.54.0