From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-a4-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a4-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3F8F35A384; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 09:40:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.147 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781602802; cv=none; b=BG33iHaMpYAj3fnCWad8RvXyLu7+/FUw3tYOS8NPaB+NSLIx/+kRZekdIaWMpfSOrwfgmU9aY0jOzZ3ArkiuvZQ19IlGPUW7GuqZ63mjgVwKq8ClqzW9cTN80X10gqQRHlw3rwcfqX1Jjfh8wsmCrsrLHMvhVxlO9iEQ96IEjyQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781602802; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9jhTj6tFzD8EGYUhAZ6WkJNSiBDdnjQ7jTcA3d6ut50=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=XZMLKsfBNy+W6UaQ9PN+3zUuPT2ZEbXRlgbnUj21zt3a77hAjO0VHCkZ8dgUh7mX/CFJDmptnEQ8WJ8T47qFRWTod7A9Mes5qxk3bcvWXygJHXmBadE1NnnKn2tQ3h5yNHF4Rzh6NCXdY3o3/09IiClPChiAyjyiRGdZIO5UaJY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kroah.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kroah.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kroah.com header.i=@kroah.com header.b=oyTJNc+o; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=Uwu7cFSQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.147 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kroah.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kroah.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kroah.com header.i=@kroah.com header.b="oyTJNc+o"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="Uwu7cFSQ" Received: from phl-compute-01.internal (phl-compute-01.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E068BEC0166; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 05:39:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-03 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-01.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 16 Jun 2026 05:39:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kroah.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1781602799; x=1781689199; bh=deZHG6C7cD lUnSSZ206KUZWnoKKAAkKaAcQuz04M5Wo=; b=oyTJNc+oeqBaX8yAURFJWKd8Ti eLo+XJoUqi7MwXx8NlHiCISG4csTXoQLwBke4QavCnMgXfxGo65J8GfwQZ8lNGgc JMBR8jiPghrqraCyJah5YkXU+h/GIHP5QsrFq6lI0g1OoQnIoi9Ac79dYf8sSlWK 7WDq9yqXW+tmXa3t/WeeRgz5MvfDy5FGCIYg4a/ic1Kv3hYr0EufDZ3iohvbsdWb 8rBBqzyM6km7ovxxl+Y01IbeJa1so/C+8fvmpamUOqg04atkOA+vQ7FUsEmGbXGa FN1DRYayPu6b+rHoFvUmTPc4lPBmwcECo2Rh2RAXdscTWi9RpTESEmR0Gh+w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1781602799; x=1781689199; bh=deZHG6C7cDlUnSSZ206KUZWnoKKAAkKaAcQ uz04M5Wo=; b=Uwu7cFSQWgdQMzcM5Jnhb59yh6ECRQKgn2qs+cMlkIc3sci6wOT /x0PBi+xM2TYij66BsBATPC0M2axRyj4lZdS8m1iG6ab3dwF6qNotFshR/qEs4GK RXHjX0OEN8YP50iQdyZjdxqbOXO/QbOGYm/naPZKqBKOb5r/rvrknwQ4wNLu7txr sOMHD3D4QL2ChZdutS6GcI8Rdm6aJ1cPNfnsyk64S1HY3RklZzGo9SvPPn0nD6kX xk4gGb7Z7U8cLWsjMtxoNcUm36PQfErIfW1N4reeMQU55wjtAwruQVXnUvHZ2IVF ZQvdFPLThRTWwrtmzVc5MvyMjDEmzk4us0w== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: dmFkZTGJcXST+37Y5YSvjjCo4KOYRNk/D1h17spIXaiFAbHzBHNIbh7ltm74MWcBYtk/bP zYSXJoAOFHXMa72lB3eONzgwfNg67PDxd82Og39ZMXYL5cVH0y6g47vVdEa/YdXB3any9N mNj7HafJw3QcBl+zgKab/3yN9qh+ryUJ+NwVcbE95FTIoDcehpkcvSEI0wEjptTQY7cZg0 IeLs9jnb7jhk/vfZtO5vcmwVVW9QfeROeJIoeXGKmQxyazVzc1RHaHcBXfCOAV+DcZSmMy oJqsK2Uh4Thaakh0UwXmJauCKp6uPcvtaNYIGqEdpTjs690pbKCd8eCIHq/R0ksBuNvIN3 9nGHK17rF9E56cvXmf8bcLhnW3nXuG7x1vhDu18hD1ig/NZVKcYw3o/Ep7JwQw18Uh1Gwb gTYpZ4IUR8TBZHaresAORBlYMaE/c8XrJIJzelmVY2ND7P/vlTu7oaPLGeyMFDNH2VSN/g doV0+jn+X2NmzwukkbAhhRrXb2sqdJtFZlfk1Y749OvPx0nBgfzhw+gr4C5jBD/vA1zTSM 9D119ovyUJA/ga5osodswH3uMl4QJYhaPxRaVKUyfy4dYgoXlIaEjSheru5Z0IQ5mk6Yff tmH1fEQmeKm/zgfYD8GY1DyE0pBJrOg/XRZzv/w8Zd+KqKIeDHrg8mnvZ5Vw X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i787e41f1:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 05:39:58 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 15:08:53 +0530 From: Greg KH To: Enlin Mu Cc: tglx@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, enlin.mu@unisoc.com, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] genirq: Add the entropy pool function to the PPI interrupt handler Message-ID: <2026061641-unblock-pursuant-7e82@gregkh> References: <20260616081730.4035-1-enlin.mu@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260616081730.4035-1-enlin.mu@linux.dev> On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 04:17:30PM +0800, Enlin Mu wrote: > Accelerate the entropy pool initialization process. > The function handle_irq_event_percpu adds entropy pool > initialization, but this logic is missing in the PPI interrupt handler. > I think this was simply an accidental omission. > > Signed-off-by: Enlin Mu > --- > kernel/irq/chip.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c > index de754db414d1..cbbd7e7d1156 100644 > --- a/kernel/irq/chip.c > +++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c > @@ -926,6 +926,7 @@ void handle_percpu_devid_irq(struct irq_desc *desc) > trace_irq_handler_entry(irq, action); > res = action->handler(irq, raw_cpu_ptr(action->percpu_dev_id)); > trace_irq_handler_exit(irq, action, res); > + add_interrupt_randomness(irq); > } else { > bool enabled = cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, desc->percpu_enabled); > > -- > 2.39.5 > > Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what needs to be done here to properly describe this. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot