mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomasz Duszynski <tduszyns@gmail.com>
To: andriy.shevchenko@intel.com
Cc: andy@kernel.org, dlechner@baylibre.com, jic23@kernel.org,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	m32285159@gmail.com, nuno.sa@analog.com, tduszyns@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iio: chemical: sps30: update email
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 18:21:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260618162139.124562-1-tduszyns@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ajOXKKDWrTURPpro@ashevche-desk.local>

> On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 07:27:15PM +0200, Tomasz Duszynski wrote:
> > The old email has been inactive for a while. Replace all occurrences
> > with the current address.
>
> ...
>
> >  .mailmap                            | 1 +
> >  drivers/iio/chemical/sps30_i2c.c    | 4 ++--
> >  drivers/iio/chemical/sps30_serial.c | 4 ++--
>
> I don't care much, but the cleaner approach is to have a separate patch
> for .mailmap and put it at the end of the series. Otherwise it's confusing
> that it's related to a certain driver, while changes are applied across
> the whole tree.

No strong opinions on the change itself, maybe except patch ordering.
I'd rather see mail mapping update placed before driver changes to make
sure it is visible if bisect ends up in the middle of the series.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-18 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-17 17:21 [PATCH v2 0/2] iio: chemical: sps30, scd30 Tomasz Duszynski
2026-06-17 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] iio: chemical: sps30: update email Tomasz Duszynski
2026-06-18  6:58   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-18 16:21     ` Tomasz Duszynski [this message]
2026-06-18 17:53       ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-17 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: chemical: scd30: " Tomasz Duszynski
2026-06-18  6:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] iio: chemical: sps30, scd30 Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-18 15:40 ` Maxwell Doose
2026-06-18 21:27   ` Maxwell Doose
2026-06-24 16:01     ` Tomasz Duszynski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260618162139.124562-1-tduszyns@gmail.com \
    --to=tduszyns@gmail.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m32285159@gmail.com \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®