From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE34230E83F; Thu, 25 Jun 2026 03:54:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.20 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782359706; cv=none; b=LG1xnOGLdMJ32uZGg+cLkmKu5Q6oNjNhgTicrs39Ejs7nhBOdUO9JGtyrsryD/GwuUlfWHYrqe+DgvNujbc96SGvkhGhIahZdC0jXXFDq9PzRrTO6btsFbt4XpCOHBvRV2oQFI3ITBKQ2B8QWkS6DJpc0zuBh+fTLy9WEFI02OY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782359706; c=relaxed/simple; bh=K+wKDSpnY0oH8tVSXtZsaykOtKAFL8Vf/C1c6rmExhA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=hGFDUufvpNRYl6IE92ifs92bUnV9+xzmYiAPa4dERqmXjeAMza9fEMZADjCqH5xcR1AldIFqvPRwH1fVPFYx0+5ooXhwx3vSftCXtSUMUBo+GLWn3vaqV6hokyR7b35q55xJvvgFEaTx/LRwk823nubYyedzJYyJRR5rXNGF4z4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=bgnslDUm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.20 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="bgnslDUm" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1782359700; x=1813895700; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=K+wKDSpnY0oH8tVSXtZsaykOtKAFL8Vf/C1c6rmExhA=; b=bgnslDUmqZAxAAxqk3Rko5U9UBd23atDNlB/AU+fjDN46JuXEb86EWkw PzbwB07Zvpg6Iv5139+eJwgcHS0WgSR4shCLYvRPBr/BRD9lGoP95tF0w Lpd5O/1L86vxCCwpEbEgfJHomCMh1WbQcdNBtAP7vnUuIaWuLEyWKRfNY 4xlSzzVmDzSO7cdxqDrhe9RTs2VZYedaL+kpDZnlR9IihCUTH0IKxvLuj amdWqdOWK1TOaaXjHx0HHrX0ZJ8hksKq88mBNM6kaW8U7xq2fJXJDvc1q /5SNLnkIAzSh/oqkXjDsaOfhmnNErG89uwfDKHzGErKfnfLeTQxHKD38E w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Co/GPT4LSUGZViotyucCFA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: KuJ8nAKYTlCBZdOz1PHA7g== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11827"; a="82901477" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,223,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="82901477" Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141]) by orvoesa112.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Jun 2026 20:54:53 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: WvbFgzDYQq2Ov4Aw9o3LSw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 4t+NZs6WRj25Ra2sI5zm1w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,223,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="288396632" Received: from 9cc2c43eec6b.jf.intel.com ([10.54.77.29]) by smtpauth.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Jun 2026 20:54:52 -0700 From: Zide Chen To: Sean Christopherson , Paolo Bonzini Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jim Mattson , Mingwei Zhang , Zide Chen , Das Sandipan , Shukla Manali , Dapeng Mi , Falcon Thomas , Xudong Hao Subject: [PATCH V5 7/7] KVM: selftests: Add perf_metrics and fixed counter 3 tests Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 20:45:55 -0700 Message-ID: <20260625034555.141453-8-zide.chen@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.54.0 In-Reply-To: <20260625034555.141453-1-zide.chen@intel.com> References: <20260625034555.141453-1-zide.chen@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Add a test case to exercise IA32_PERF_METRICS, i.e. architectural support for Topdown (TMA) Level 1 metrics, enumerated by IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES[15]. Only check for non-zero metrics, as they are derived and depend on the workload, CPU model, and host scheduling, making precise expectations fragile. Extend the PMU selftest to cover Intel fixed counter 3 by bumping MAX_NR_FIXED_COUNTERS to 4 and validating basic functionality. Signed-off-by: Zide Chen --- v3: - Slightly reword comment to explain the sum of topdown metrics is close to 100%. - Change abs() with explicit bounds (sum >= 0xfd && sum <= 0x102) for better readability. v2: - New patch. --- --- tools/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/pmu.h | 3 + .../selftests/kvm/x86/pmu_counters_test.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++-- 3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h index eff29645719b..e7745e2cd543 100644 --- a/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h +++ b/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h @@ -331,6 +331,7 @@ #define PERF_CAP_PEBS_FORMAT 0xf00 #define PERF_CAP_FW_WRITES BIT_ULL(13) #define PERF_CAP_PEBS_BASELINE BIT_ULL(14) +#define PERF_CAP_PERF_METRICS BIT_ULL(15) #define PERF_CAP_PEBS_TIMING_INFO BIT_ULL(17) #define PERF_CAP_PEBS_MASK (PERF_CAP_PEBS_TRAP | PERF_CAP_ARCH_REG | \ PERF_CAP_PEBS_FORMAT | PERF_CAP_PEBS_BASELINE | \ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/pmu.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/pmu.h index 608ed83d7c6a..6c19503e0bb7 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/pmu.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/pmu.h @@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ /* Fixed PMC controls, Intel only. */ #define FIXED_PMC_GLOBAL_CTRL_ENABLE(_idx) BIT_ULL((32 + (_idx))) +/* PERF_METRICS enable, Intel only. */ +#define PERF_METRICS_GLOBAL_CTRL_ENABLE BIT_ULL(48) + #define FIXED_PMC_KERNEL BIT_ULL(0) #define FIXED_PMC_USER BIT_ULL(1) #define FIXED_PMC_ANYTHREAD BIT_ULL(2) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/pmu_counters_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/pmu_counters_test.c index dc6afac3aa91..db5ec222ef9e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/pmu_counters_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/pmu_counters_test.c @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ #include "pmu.h" #include "processor.h" +#include /* Number of iterations of the loop for the guest measurement payload. */ #define NUM_LOOPS 10 @@ -241,17 +242,20 @@ do { \ ); \ } while (0) -#define GUEST_TEST_EVENT(_idx, _pmc, _pmc_msr, _ctrl_msr, _value, FEP) \ +#define GUEST_RUN_PAYLOAD(_ctrl_msr, _value, FEP) \ do { \ - wrmsr(_pmc_msr, 0); \ - \ if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSHOPT)) \ GUEST_MEASURE_EVENT(_ctrl_msr, _value, "clflushopt %[m]", FEP); \ else if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSH)) \ GUEST_MEASURE_EVENT(_ctrl_msr, _value, "clflush %[m]", FEP); \ else \ GUEST_MEASURE_EVENT(_ctrl_msr, _value, "nop", FEP); \ - \ +} while (0) + +#define GUEST_TEST_EVENT(_idx, _pmc, _pmc_msr, _ctrl_msr, _value, FEP) \ +do { \ + wrmsr(_pmc_msr, 0); \ + GUEST_RUN_PAYLOAD(_ctrl_msr, _value, FEP); \ guest_assert_event_count(_idx, _pmc, _pmc_msr); \ } while (0) @@ -318,6 +322,56 @@ static void guest_test_arch_event(u8 idx) FIXED_PMC_GLOBAL_CTRL_ENABLE(i)); } +static void guest_test_perf_metrics(void) +{ + int retiring, bad_spec, fe_bound, be_bound, sum; + u64 global_ctrl, metrics; + + if ((guest_get_pmu_version() < 2) || /* Does guest have GLOBAL_CTRL? */ + !this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PDCM) || + !(rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES) & PERF_CAP_PERF_METRICS)) + return; + + wrmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 0); + wrmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR3, 0); + wrmsr(MSR_PERF_METRICS, 0); + + /* Enable fixed ctr3 (TOPDOWN.SLOTS) and PERF_METRICS. */ + wrmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR_CTRL, FIXED_PMC_CTRL(3, FIXED_PMC_KERNEL)); + global_ctrl = FIXED_PMC_GLOBAL_CTRL_ENABLE(3) | + PERF_METRICS_GLOBAL_CTRL_ENABLE; + + GUEST_RUN_PAYLOAD(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, global_ctrl, ""); + + /* Check test results. */ + metrics = rdmsr(MSR_PERF_METRICS); + retiring = FIELD_GET(GENMASK_ULL(7, 0), metrics); + bad_spec = FIELD_GET(GENMASK_ULL(15, 8), metrics); + fe_bound = FIELD_GET(GENMASK_ULL(23, 16), metrics); + be_bound = FIELD_GET(GENMASK_ULL(31, 24), metrics); + + /* + * Be conservative: the measured payload definitely retires work, so + * Retiring should be non-zero. + */ + GUEST_ASSERT_NE(metrics, 0ULL); + GUEST_ASSERT_NE(retiring, 0ULL); + + /* + * The sum of the 4 level-1 topdown metrics should be close to 100%. + * 3 is chosen as a loose sanity check. + */ + sum = retiring + bad_spec + fe_bound + be_bound; + GUEST_ASSERT(sum >= 0xfd && sum <= 0x101); + + /* Sanity check after PERF_METRICS disabled. */ + __asm__ __volatile__("loop ." : "+c"((int){NUM_LOOPS})); + GUEST_ASSERT_EQ(rdmsr(MSR_PERF_METRICS), metrics); + wrmsr(MSR_PERF_METRICS, 0xdeaddead); + + GUEST_ASSERT_EQ(rdmsr(MSR_PERF_METRICS), 0xdeaddead); +} + static void guest_test_arch_events(void) { u8 i; @@ -325,6 +379,8 @@ static void guest_test_arch_events(void) for (i = 0; i < NR_INTEL_ARCH_EVENTS; i++) guest_test_arch_event(i); + guest_test_perf_metrics(); + GUEST_DONE(); } @@ -361,7 +417,7 @@ static void test_arch_events(u8 pmu_version, u64 perf_capabilities, * other than PMCs in the future. */ #define MAX_NR_GP_COUNTERS 8 -#define MAX_NR_FIXED_COUNTERS 3 +#define MAX_NR_FIXED_COUNTERS 4 #define GUEST_ASSERT_PMC_MSR_ACCESS(insn, msr, expect_gp, vector) \ __GUEST_ASSERT(expect_gp ? vector == GP_VECTOR : !vector, \ @@ -585,6 +641,7 @@ static void test_intel_counters(void) u8 nr_fixed_counters = kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_NR_FIXED_COUNTERS); u8 nr_gp_counters = kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_NR_GP_COUNTERS); u8 pmu_version = kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_VERSION); + u64 advertised_perf_caps = kvm_get_feature_msr(MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES); unsigned int i; u8 v, j; u32 k; @@ -592,6 +649,7 @@ static void test_intel_counters(void) const u64 perf_caps[] = { 0, PMU_CAP_FW_WRITES, + PERF_CAP_PERF_METRICS, }; /* @@ -649,6 +707,10 @@ static void test_intel_counters(void) if (!kvm_has_perf_caps && perf_caps[i]) continue; + /* Ignore unsupported features. */ + if (perf_caps[i] & ~advertised_perf_caps) + continue; + pr_info("Testing arch events, PMU version %u, perf_caps = %lx\n", v, perf_caps[i]); -- 2.54.0