From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f50.google.com (mail-wm1-f50.google.com [209.85.128.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6089B3D567A for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2026 06:48:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.50 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782456495; cv=none; b=B3aFJfHIESq+tMBcR3Du6Tj4ipFAxNsmeu+LoIdtYiBZ69mnHqL8kbM1JUCIYuWeX2TB47snAyUIicg+1JsjoH5qKdIJjJEan7tvyoGdN2IkWVLc3ZuJL/9AhLgLOLTTiobklQBFXch66XmBjTc6Bg26FBhRoWh7vy98c5+3qsc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782456495; c=relaxed/simple; bh=piuMXamwFeb2ty8Py4xAcFtdGIavuUxn7rU5cnWtoPQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=rrFtyIc/m5FiZSutODpHtuoLOJ2Rc0OcJDt2XLamfZxfWWAfVLZ1ZjL+TeAxk1k5C43m/iPZ7sediasXR4lt0VBjbKpcNcmsrXqAGyUCnSkXXHMNbjMUs+W2+Keeg0xt+XuvXcQn/fch0PpHzK22ZCjKvTJ7ge3g4Zkd7JOmrPk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=rvGA7NH0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.50 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="rvGA7NH0" Received: by mail-wm1-f50.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4924593f45dso7628305e9.1 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2026 23:48:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1782456493; x=1783061293; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=9N0cksKNHvZ81428H3lVKSOV4A7mJ0/dw00DfAdSSuw=; b=rvGA7NH0gGqh2GN3utS10bLKcyq6MpKq9xr4fn7zMD5PboGse+svuU8M/vaJ5jpit3 45Cg8YgpJKIGB52GMmd5ZznCQC/hKc5ieYyxyvrcZpRtjBUzks7fL0YJHSErmYG3Y48t E+VKPGzmyetIPttbVIfo8AG7V+uezBcBmlFiJrnm8ZRb82OLu+COc68dO0bQhZjHOXkN hwv0b2VMisxwn6w9L0cbJn6eTgKAN10CeChBHk7I8JVxUwFKnCe4vMZ4bTdKQFbr+0EB JPxhAo8I/40R+V1jrkroc6jACSWHOnue1/eRQGowtNF23b2NVutmDBUj5/HWVCg0DyhK lpCg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1782456493; x=1783061293; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=9N0cksKNHvZ81428H3lVKSOV4A7mJ0/dw00DfAdSSuw=; b=MX9HZzsAOuW7fGJz2x/LdQqRhzBaYW3XpIlVik7TTvi2ZuEHlIOmeCsYye6mN822zV l7k2bU9sDLNKieRRJuvHqGI4eUdXeHjvARG9F9aSiR+Yi8Xd+Jm7/MUprcw+13lNkanV ZnfVeLipHM90FiDliTiFk6B/I4onwr73z0gda/nVgiOvdwjxkTYQ1l4DL8N3pfvioWqN IIMIF9pNXtwc+1YYV+YaHm72mfnKlmk8zgMuL8p0Y9nCGuQsN1Uop5dGV3nO0qDc8dAk 793Y1RBcInG8t4kDI1qEGwJECHTcqGVYytgC8VhF/OK4wP28NXHJLxYXGQkTW0Yvyomv 2eow== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ/NooEHja1xFPVdCSbfovjSEeFFiuSRcR+frVYQTsf9ehv/2ZXMbK5tIROp4ozfimRga8j4pynDqhomYpY=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzwIhIgOmG7zjrPrJBAddYt9XNUBPXqjsKMglCwjwPrczd6VFwd tfdQne9FLgSUE+pb7PoXAKPtYQ0HYejvuWuIpN+AUFCfuzcNKHUZv1jS X-Gm-Gg: AfdE7cm3an+H+Wdz7V8CiZqY5wPfo/jkMPzq+U2NqoezqGcyOfn1DyBaG5WAoL7/ZDy ApUhIrl2x+5/+QmC4YX8yQzOpxwbTecd98Ra1NJTMakTnjznxTYyebRsbbxJg4Bd6NJlRbv0IR1 Iu/uwA/zYbe60FRYkRbG/+r9b6d5saRGNsCrOwbAoDUJp0m0Ovxj1wQyVa2eWP3RaY29CrrD29Z DIy5dyeqMEovbydlfuSNa01QQVAYnxfBgdKagJmPYf4tTIPluVMk03eVpIMF6OubqAVDhT6U2BU JDl9VHcxkVl7u0oc2yI7BhtznmJHXN5R2dI4YgygAdOe7VDUg/J/W/pcphaY5oujZgznl1o2q/O uDQnSRo5iY3kjklhE53qK3sVyUKX0wA+xDTwvDin5S0iDx+IjaDAIY2kwvntkYhHNWNHZVI4gXd JmX9W8NSdMuOYFYouAcP/1eL0t93bdG2n1ojdqsL+7BbLABwtFwg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3143:b0:492:4cce:53e2 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4926683b1a2mr69365785e9.3.1782456492535; Thu, 25 Jun 2026 23:48:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pumpkin (82-69-66-36.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.69.66.36]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-492690a1a85sm93653035e9.15.2026.06.25.23.48.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 25 Jun 2026 23:48:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 07:48:10 +0100 From: David Laight To: suryasaimadhu Cc: andy@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: fbtft: fix unaligned access and buffer size when startbyte is used Message-ID: <20260626074810.433c4006@pumpkin> In-Reply-To: <20260625103041.281190-1-suryasaimadhu369@gmail.com> References: <20260625103041.281190-1-suryasaimadhu369@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.38; arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 25 Jun 2026 18:30:41 +0800 suryasaimadhu wrote: > When par->startbyte is non-zero, buf is advanced by one byte creating > an unaligned pointer for 16-bit types (u16, __be16). Dereferencing this > unaligned pointer can cause a kernel panic on strict-alignment > architectures. > > Fix by using put_unaligned() instead of direct pointer dereference. > > Also fix incorrect buffer size calculation in fbtft_write_buf_dc() call: > len * (sizeof(data_type) + offset) /* wrong: multiplies offset by len */ > len * sizeof(data_type) + offset /* correct: one startbyte + > len items */ That should probably be a separate patch. > > Signed-off-by: suryasaimadhu > --- > drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c | 13 ++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c > index 2169f8d1d..cfcf4d7e7 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include "fbtft.h" > +#include > > /***************************************************************************** > * > @@ -40,7 +41,7 @@ void func(struct fbtft_par *par, int len, ...) \ I'd consider changing that to: func(struct fbtft_par *par, int len, u8 cmd, ...) and probably reducing len by one. It makes it more obvious that the first parameter is mandatory and the ... is associated data. David > offset = 1; \ > } \ > \ > - *buf = modifier((data_type)va_arg(args, unsigned int)); \ > + put_unaligned(modifier((data_type)va_arg(args, unsigned int)), buf); \ > ret = fbtft_write_buf_dc(par, par->buf, sizeof(data_type) + offset, \ > 0); \ > if (ret < 0) \ > @@ -52,11 +53,13 @@ void func(struct fbtft_par *par, int len, ...) \ > \ > if (len) { \ > i = len; \ > - while (i--) \ > - *buf++ = modifier((data_type)va_arg(args, \ > - unsigned int)); \ > + while (i--) { \ > + put_unaligned(modifier((data_type)va_arg(args, \ > + unsigned int)), buf); \ > + buf++; \ > + } \ > fbtft_write_buf_dc(par, par->buf, \ > - len * (sizeof(data_type) + offset), 1); \ > + len * sizeof(data_type) + offset, 1); \ > } \ > out: \ > va_end(args); \