mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debugobjects: skip activate fixup when disabled by a concurrent OOM
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2026 23:01:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260627230105.0989abc510ad6e5cf63a862c@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260610034726.213910-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>

On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 11:47:25 +0800 Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev> wrote:

> When a tracking object cannot be allocated, lookup_object_or_alloc()
> sets debug_objects_enabled = false and the caller runs
> debug_objects_oom(), which wipes the whole hash. The flag is cleared
> before the hash is wiped.
> 
> debug_object_activate() only tests debug_objects_enabled once on entry.
> If another CPU hits OOM and wipes the hash after that test, the lookup
> here misses and the object is taken as ODEBUG_STATE_NOTAVAILABLE.
> fixup_activate() then "repairs" it; for timers that overwrites a live
> timer's callback with stub_timer, which later fires a bogus WARN.
> 
> Re-check debug_objects_enabled while still holding the bucket lock,
> before the fixup. The flag is cleared before the hash is wiped, and both
> the wipe and the lookup are serialized by the bucket lock, so a
> wipe-induced miss is guaranteed to observe the cleared flag and the
> spurious fixup is skipped.

Thanks for working on this.

The patch was sent at an inopportune time - late in -rc people aren't
paying much attention to new material so bugfixes can fall through
cracks.

How was this problem observed?  Code inspection?  Fault injection? 
Real-world failures?

If it is known that this WARN can trigger in real-world situations then
we'll probably want to fix earlier kernels, which means a Fixes: and a
cc:stable.

> --- a/lib/debugobjects.c
> +++ b/lib/debugobjects.c
> @@ -865,6 +865,16 @@ int debug_object_activate(void *addr, const struct debug_obj_descr *descr)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * A concurrent OOM teardown may have disabled debugobjects and
> +	 * wiped the hash after the check at function entry. So we need
> +	 * check it again here.
> +	 */
> +	if (!debug_objects_enabled) {
> +		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&db->lock, flags);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +

Sashiko AI review suggests that further fixing might be needed:
	https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260610034726.213910-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev


  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-28  6:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-10  3:47 Jiayuan Chen
2026-06-28  6:01 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2026-06-28 16:52   ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260627230105.0989abc510ad6e5cf63a862c@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome