From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF8D538E126 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2026 08:08:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783152508; cv=none; b=cGpFdqAI/skfHAAokPA1dnsvbQVdr8YYnuAeot+UthPuc+1MUi/5LsWdXeg5V9rUz0rqdFj2psDESXO3yGjx5Cfu/WCRkophk/s17vZawmfqig4AILZm2C3g37CpOu4B+m5/fwMQQVGyPb6TEZjBx1gszMHgr3XivLeyMR/hyac= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783152508; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6a+tM50H7cEVzsG/9/OEwyLSfjW0k/49ZjhUXW6TbIk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=SnGUBURF6q53XfREJMEYjrPDF2AttQdmigXP8uXy4vNp4nFfRC3I/JeDLYjqFsxrZTAp0IRs8pZYourbBKWuKYaGKYhTdgHmWCzUR32n1w4LpmldhxTLi8PpVwEh+lwSSPSXUS4NuBRFZCE+ww4T3lByj4q1hCLCywUQeIugwB0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=OU9sESnQ; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=Gyyg9ZJM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="OU9sESnQ"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="Gyyg9ZJM" Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2026 10:08:21 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1783152503; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UmDC8y34VJQ0klM0ubm5kPNH4d+EgxQ7xsxUvuksfz0=; b=OU9sESnQAly2JPrMBf8kpKSCizIaZgV4dBKxKCwITKz7EIp4lwEJCpl7YtmHgcxEhttXJu NmhXaBID7lEfqDLXrldb6c3xZACRlIbbk/lJ7NVWLZUzJIsriWJepXuGXQpgNJLR+giMfO QL7mzXMezYBS8A905hfrK9ABnL1mGKq3QLf3jT9mPMLvNfX5Sirj91Nh45YVGzwirLAJAV 7aB6RtfmPOqCVhfwX0WOBoJAfaGypbhnoWxdJez7DKy01gLDUTy9KxvJmL6HDLmchBlJn6 vCkk8o2zI2vxK2nUn8u9581i6kHLhqSJuZgtG9LJJ/58Qvk2Pc/tOUOw/ZuXZg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1783152503; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UmDC8y34VJQ0klM0ubm5kPNH4d+EgxQ7xsxUvuksfz0=; b=Gyyg9ZJMu7qb+3CvsfZz3QUYPJ9hsXM1Gb8c8MV89X0QsMsZ9CV5cGwgCpFB5/QspDeM5n Axd4OJzuE7EkgnDw== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , Ingo Molnar , Jonathan Corbet , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Start removing X86_X32_ABI Message-ID: <20260704080821.OyQgPFuT@linutronix.de> References: <20260523093734.A3AR7reJ@linutronix.de> <87e8bd0e-ddb6-4972-a99a-c0fb80faf1ec@app.fastmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87e8bd0e-ddb6-4972-a99a-c0fb80faf1ec@app.fastmail.com> On 2026-06-01 00:05:03 [+0200], Arnd Bergmann wrote: > I agree removing the Kconfig symbol (or marking it as 'depends > on BROKEN' as we did for arm64 big-endian mode) is a good > idea at this time, but I think the timing for removing the > actual implementation should allow the next LTS kernel (7.4?) > to be released with the current level of support still present. I am catching up and am considering reposting that one. You really thing it is worth postponing this until the next LTS? If so I would let it depend on broken and remove after the LTS gets out. > Arnd Sebastian