From: Xiang Mei <xmei5@asu.edu>
To: Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>, Li Qiang <liq3ea@gmail.com>,
Weiming Shi <bestswngs@gmail.com>, Xiang Mei <xmei5@asu.edu>
Subject: [PATCH] vfio/pci: clear vdev->msi_perm after freeing it on init failure
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2026 18:40:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260705014010.1297885-1-xmei5@asu.edu> (raw)
vfio_msi_cap_len() lazily allocates the per-device MSI permission table:
vdev->msi_perm = kmalloc_obj(struct perm_bits, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
if (!vdev->msi_perm)
return -ENOMEM;
ret = init_pci_cap_msi_perm(vdev->msi_perm, len, flags);
if (ret) {
kfree(vdev->msi_perm);
return ret; /* vdev->msi_perm left dangling */
}
When init_pci_cap_msi_perm() -> alloc_perm_bits() fails with -ENOMEM, the
error path frees vdev->msi_perm but leaves the freed pointer stored in
it. vdev->msi_perm is not re-zeroed later because struct
vfio_pci_core_device is per-device and persists across open/close cycles,
and the vfio_config_init() error path returns without calling
vfio_config_free(). So the dangling pointer outlives the failed open.
That leads to two use-after-frees on the same device:
1. Reuse. The next vfio_config_init() sees the stale pointer at
"if (vdev->msi_perm) return len;" and reuses the freed object. MSI
config accesses in vfio_pci_config_rw_single() then dereference and
call the freed perm->readfn / perm->writefn function pointers.
2. Double free. A later vfio_config_free() runs free_perm_bits() and
kfree() on the already-freed object.
Fix it by NULLing vdev->msi_perm after the kfree(), matching the
NULL-after-free discipline already used in free_perm_bits() and
vfio_config_free().
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in vfio_pci_config_rw_single (drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c:1961)
Read of size 8 at addr ffff88800fcc88d0 by task exploit/143
Call Trace:
...
kasan_report (mm/kasan/report.c:595)
vfio_pci_config_rw_single (drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c:1961)
vfio_pci_config_rw (drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c:1986)
vfio_pci_rw (drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c:1599)
vfs_read (fs/read_write.c:572)
__x64_sys_pread64 (fs/read_write.c:764)
do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94)
...
Followed on device close by a double free of the same object:
Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address
0x1f63e0e8000008: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI
RIP: 0010:kfree (mm/slub.c:6711)
Call Trace:
vfio_config_free (drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c:1861)
vfio_pci_core_disable (drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c:685)
vfio_pci_core_close_device (drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c:777)
vfio_df_close (drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c:602)
vfio_device_fops_release (drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c:648)
__fput (fs/file_table.c:512)
__x64_sys_close (fs/open.c:1496)
do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94)
...
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
Fixes: 30ea32ab1951 ("vfio/pci: Fix potential memory leak in vfio_msi_cap_len")
Reported-by: Weiming Shi <bestswngs@gmail.com>
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
Signed-off-by: Xiang Mei <xmei5@asu.edu>
---
drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
index a10ed733f0e3..9914f3ac69ae 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
@@ -1272,6 +1272,7 @@ static int vfio_msi_cap_len(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, u8 pos)
ret = init_pci_cap_msi_perm(vdev->msi_perm, len, flags);
if (ret) {
kfree(vdev->msi_perm);
+ vdev->msi_perm = NULL;
return ret;
}
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-07-05 1:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-05 1:40 Xiang Mei [this message]
2026-07-17 15:43 ` Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260705014010.1297885-1-xmei5@asu.edu \
--to=xmei5@asu.edu \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=bestswngs@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liq3ea@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox