From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDAFF3BB9E3; Thu, 9 Jul 2026 00:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783558472; cv=none; b=e7Q5Si6Te0DSWopAiD4exWaINypoQnJsU8Zt+CPzHEv+41YGOPZbv/J7wCefGbKUyQXABWd+EFr5DiwFJ5M5BVlOGcucfETgfA0NUwGbMv209qL23xGAcqTL3cqWykLpKpdZbUTrE7UjACZ5cOBlF8LsIooSdKMmQTgXFoOqGWg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783558472; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3zzAFIxW4QntGIfc+v0S58ciMfKRPipxII9rhMorBnU=; h=From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=WG/4at/6o6K48PITTyiUslfqtcZEnvECIoM6VMBbnOxhd79t3tygQ8T8el+0SiYb+EQe+JyejYnWssb3Odvf6gABvH0aH72ouorTPsD7GssGgLemFi/2x66ehfYtFUcwKRmZcsZfK493NopW7k0jpK6MpnEFoScsGg687cZbF78= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=JHhSdyHr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="JHhSdyHr" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E82C01F00A3A; Thu, 9 Jul 2026 00:54:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1783558470; bh=V9/QBsgUl+YAHSU3KRVgzfp7o3z60FnCLy+stiPlLsM=; h=From:Date:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=JHhSdyHrMv3HYWgzywYRpT7QlQXiZc7MOOUajFWvyWfSn//S91ntd/aiQVpkXl3gZ dXAV8b3b3t1MLfq7g1PBQCviLnyMLUGQFpbFOyvxkS9YdvqosFRCrHJE+kEV8pI/iV n3veUxbASo5fqzBuLX531xhxkVLd+tPlpSZxzJ0yUVOHakdc4LbPq57dktbzl48jEz h/cANciH0eBoW0OFO0p3XGuHFDlChbxyKGUjc3fdKQao2P3000I0rzL4KMPOjelgxL XxwNbVGh7nzpI7n0JTkISh/VA6rL2HHbGvWJxdlpPX5IVBDz7verl131f1nGVBCPA2 UOzHL0f+IX4iA== From: Mark Brown Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:52:03 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v11 26/29] KVM: arm64: selftests: Remove spurious check for single bit safe values Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20260709-kvm-arm64-sme-v11-26-32799f66db9d@kernel.org> References: <20260709-kvm-arm64-sme-v11-0-32799f66db9d@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260709-kvm-arm64-sme-v11-0-32799f66db9d@kernel.org> To: Marc Zyngier , Joey Gouly , Catalin Marinas , Suzuki K Poulose , Will Deacon , Paolo Bonzini , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Oliver Upton Cc: Dave Martin , Fuad Tabba , Mark Rutland , Ben Horgan , Jean-Philippe Brucker , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Peter Maydell , Eric Auger , Mark Brown X-Mailer: b4 0.16-dev X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=openpgp-sha256; l=1200; i=broonie@kernel.org; h=from:subject:message-id; bh=3zzAFIxW4QntGIfc+v0S58ciMfKRPipxII9rhMorBnU=; b=owEBbQGS/pANAwAKASTWi3JdVIfQAcsmYgBqTvDOgySLljelyliKuU68aJ+WXhNqdDXOfQ0X4 bcC9XPp6huJATMEAAEKAB0WIQSt5miqZ1cYtZ/in+ok1otyXVSH0AUCak7wzgAKCRAk1otyXVSH 0GWSCACGxmWrQ//D7mkxehILTyoZqXgMWn4QUvdAzZvcEQUfnApZz2Fx+P0B/pacM1M/ANcFOXb 4rIK3YeCiQ9T+e4aP0ed5eIIWgGii4tUqB8W3WbaRBVDy5acbaPcC86EQprEW3SqPH1zASj9g4e W14/9v9xDstwShBLuGS2ko3BPgV6zVXWglpZgs4w1vSd27xd+N9/FHq2tbSdGkkO4fMEEDEbkhm Lqjb579vseeZ19GR2ZlmeGwh3mbE4rukGBN3bBzVhlXJY5r2TEJqfHiV8Xch4G2LhRMg6OeNqZ1 0nhUdWvXMFnrtZS5hisxWpteAQJxNdcxe7fcjzWIo2Ryaudi X-Developer-Key: i=broonie@kernel.org; a=openpgp; fpr=3F2568AAC26998F9E813A1C5C3F436CA30F5D8EB get_safe_value() currently asserts that bitfields it is generating a safe value for must be more than one bit wide but in actual fact it should always be possible to generate a safe value to write to a bitfield even if it is just the current value and the function correctly handles that. Remove the assert. Fixes: bf09ee918053e ("KVM: arm64: selftests: Remove ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_BITS and its last user") Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c index 7429a1055df5..9eceac84e297 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c @@ -279,8 +279,6 @@ u64 get_safe_value(const struct reg_ftr_bits *ftr_bits, u64 ftr) { u64 ftr_max = ftr_bits->mask >> ftr_bits->shift; - TEST_ASSERT(ftr_max > 1, "This test doesn't support single bit features"); - if (ftr_bits->sign == FTR_UNSIGNED) { switch (ftr_bits->type) { case FTR_EXACT: -- 2.47.3