From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Cc: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/5] bpf, x86: make sure allocation in arch_bpf_trampoline_size() is writable
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2026 12:43:48 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260711-execmem-x86-rox-bpf-v0-v2-4-bfd956d35119@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260711-execmem-x86-rox-bpf-v0-v2-0-bfd956d35119@kernel.org>
arch_bpf_trampoline_size() allocates a buffer to get actual size required
for a trampoline.
This buffer must be in the module address space because
__arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() calculates rel32 offsets relatively to
that buffer.
In preparation for enabling ROX mode for EXECMEM_BPF make sure that the
allocated memory is writable.
Add bpf_jit_alloc_exec_rw() wrapper for execmem_alloc_rw() and use it for
buffer allocation in arch_bpf_trampoline_size().
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 5 ++---
include/linux/filter.h | 1 +
kernel/bpf/core.c | 5 +++++
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index de7515ea1bea..b2feec81e231 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -3703,13 +3703,12 @@ int arch_bpf_trampoline_size(const struct btf_func_model *m, u32 flags,
int ret;
/* Allocate a temporary buffer for __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline().
- * This will NOT cause fragmentation in direct map, as we do not
- * call set_memory_*() on this buffer.
*
* We cannot use kvmalloc here, because we need image to be in
* module memory range.
+ * Since it must be writable use bpf_jit_alloc_exec_rw().
*/
- image = bpf_jit_alloc_exec(PAGE_SIZE);
+ image = bpf_jit_alloc_exec_rw(PAGE_SIZE);
if (!image)
return -ENOMEM;
diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index 14acb2455746..32d5297c557e 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -1333,6 +1333,7 @@ bpf_jit_binary_alloc(unsigned int proglen, u8 **image_ptr,
void bpf_jit_binary_free(struct bpf_binary_header *hdr);
u64 bpf_jit_alloc_exec_limit(void);
void *bpf_jit_alloc_exec(unsigned long size);
+void *bpf_jit_alloc_exec_rw(unsigned long size);
void bpf_jit_free_exec(void *addr);
void bpf_jit_free(struct bpf_prog *fp);
struct bpf_binary_header *
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 1b89c18cf246..e2076667b245 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -1128,6 +1128,11 @@ void *bpf_jit_alloc_exec(unsigned long size)
return execmem_alloc(EXECMEM_BPF, size);
}
+void *bpf_jit_alloc_exec_rw(unsigned long size)
+{
+ return execmem_alloc_rw(EXECMEM_BPF, size);
+}
+
void bpf_jit_free_exec(void *addr)
{
execmem_free(addr);
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-11 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-11 9:43 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/5] bpf, x86: enable EXECMEM_ROX_CACHE for BPF allocations Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-07-11 9:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/5] bpf: dispatcher: allocate bpf_dispatcher->rw_image with vmalloc() Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-07-11 9:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/5] bpf: drop __weak from bpf_jit_alloc_exec() and bpf_jit_free_exec() Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-07-11 9:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/5] bpf: alloc_prog_pack(): skip ROX management for already ROX memory Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
2026-07-11 9:43 ` Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) [this message]
2026-07-11 9:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/5] x86/bpf: enable EXECMEM_ROX_CACHE for BPF allocations Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260711-execmem-x86-rox-bpf-v0-v2-4-bfd956d35119@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox