From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huaweicloud.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>, Pu Lehui <pulehui@huaweicloud.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add testcases for callback with tailcall
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2026 10:47:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260711104727.4023420-3-pulehui@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260711104727.4023420-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com>
From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Add 3 testcases for callback with tailcall.
1. callback directly invokes tailcall
2. callback->subprog->tailcall
3. callback->subprog0->subprog1->tailcall
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c | 7 +
.../selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_callback.c | 129 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 136 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_callback.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
index a5a226d0104c..c66037162da5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#include "tailcall_cgrp_storage_no_storage.skel.h"
#include "tailcall_cgrp_storage.skel.h"
#include "tailcall_sleepable.skel.h"
+#include "tailcall_callback.skel.h"
/* test_tailcall_1 checks basic functionality by patching multiple locations
* in a single program for a single tail call slot with nop->jmp, jmp->nop
@@ -1901,6 +1902,11 @@ static void test_tailcall_sleepable(void)
tailcall_sleepable__destroy(skel);
}
+static void test_tailcall_callback(void)
+{
+ RUN_TESTS(tailcall_callback);
+}
+
void test_tailcalls(void)
{
if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_1"))
@@ -1967,4 +1973,5 @@ void test_tailcalls(void)
test_tailcall_cgrp_storage_no_storage_leaf();
if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_cgrp_storage_no_storage_bridge"))
test_tailcall_cgrp_storage_no_storage_bridge();
+ test_tailcall_callback();
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_callback.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_callback.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..504d8e7a6996
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_callback.c
@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+#include "bpf_test_utils.h"
+
+int classifier_0(struct __sk_buff *skb);
+int classifier_1(struct __sk_buff *skb);
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY);
+ __uint(max_entries, 2);
+ __uint(key_size, sizeof(__u32));
+ __array(values, void (void));
+} jmp_table SEC(".maps") = {
+ .values = {
+ [0] = (void *) &classifier_0,
+ [1] = (void *) &classifier_1,
+ },
+};
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+ __uint(max_entries, 1);
+ __uint(key_size, sizeof(__u32));
+ __uint(value_size, sizeof(__u32));
+} arraymap SEC(".maps");
+
+__auxiliary
+SEC("tc")
+int classifier_0(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static __noinline
+int subprog_tail1(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 1);
+ barrier_var(ret);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+__auxiliary
+SEC("tc")
+int classifier_1(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = subprog_tail1(skb);
+ __sink(ret);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static __noinline
+int subprog_tail0(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = subprog_tail1(skb);
+ barrier_var(ret);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static __noinline
+int callback_loop_1(int index, void **cb_ctx)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ bpf_tail_call_static(*cb_ctx, &jmp_table, 0);
+ barrier_var(ret);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static __noinline
+int callback_loop_2(int index, void **cb_ctx)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = subprog_tail1(*cb_ctx);
+ barrier_var(ret);
+ return ret ? 1 : 0;
+}
+
+static __noinline
+int callback_for_each(void *map, __u32 *key, __u64 *val, void **cb_ctx)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = subprog_tail0(*cb_ctx);
+ barrier_var(ret);
+ return ret ? 1 : 0;
+}
+/* callback involving tail call directly is rejected */
+SEC("tc")
+__failure __msg("callback unexpected regs 1")
+int tailcall_direct_callback(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ clobber_regs_stack();
+
+ bpf_loop(1, callback_loop_1, &skb, 0);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* callback involving 1 subprog with tail call is rejected */
+SEC("tc")
+__failure __msg("cannot tail call within callback")
+int tailcall_bpf2bpf_callback_1(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ clobber_regs_stack();
+
+ bpf_loop(1, callback_loop_2, &skb, 0);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* callback involving 2 subprogs with tail call is rejected */
+SEC("tc")
+__failure __msg("cannot tail call within callback")
+int tailcall_bpf2bpf_callback_2(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ clobber_regs_stack();
+
+ bpf_for_each_map_elem(&arraymap, callback_for_each, &skb, 0);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+char __license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-11 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-11 10:47 [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] Reject callback subprogs invoke tailcall Pu Lehui
2026-07-11 10:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: " Pu Lehui
2026-07-11 11:33 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-13 22:09 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-11 10:47 ` Pu Lehui [this message]
2026-07-13 22:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add testcases for callback with tailcall Eduard Zingerman
2026-07-14 2:01 ` Pu Lehui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260711104727.4023420-3-pulehui@huaweicloud.com \
--to=pulehui@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=pulehui@huawei.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox