From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, tglx@kernel.org,
mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
hpa@zytor.com, Omar Avelar <omar.avelar@intel.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/build/64: Prevent native builds from generating APX instructions
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2026 16:25:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260712202538.GA1697833@ax162> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708211435.402426-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 09:14:35PM +0000, Chang S. Bae wrote:
> Omar reported this broad concern to me, when resolving a separate issue
> with his custom module. CONFIG_X86_NATIVE_CPU=y allows builds to
> opportunistically emit APX instructions when the build host supports APX
> since commit:
>
> ea1dcca1de12 ("x86/kbuild/64: Add the CONFIG_X86_NATIVE_CPU option to locally optimize the kernel with '-march=native'")
>
> The kernel is not yet prepared to use APX internally. For example, there
> is no context-switch support for general in-kernel use of the extended
> GPRs.
>
> Explicitly disable APX when building with `-march=native`.
>
> Since GCC 14 and LLVM 18, both compilers support APX. LLVM 19 is already
> the minimum version to support native builds from:
>
> ad9b861824ac ("x86/kbuild/64: Restrict clang versions that can use '-march=native'")
>
> RUST supports APX detection via XCR0 since v1.91 release. While the
> support is not official yet, conservatively set that version as the
> minimum.
>
> Reported-by: Omar Avelar <omar.avelar@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.16+
> Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> ---
Miguel's comment aside:
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Some style feedback below.
> ---
> arch/x86/Makefile | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Makefile b/arch/x86/Makefile
> index 598f178102ee..256948e65073 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/Makefile
> @@ -161,7 +161,15 @@ else
>
> ifdef CONFIG_X86_NATIVE_CPU
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += -march=native
> - KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS += -Ctarget-cpu=native
> + # Do not generate APX instructions as in-kernel use isn't ready
> + ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC
> + KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(if $(call gcc-min-version,140000),-mno-apxf,)
> + endif
> + ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
> + # The minimum version for native build already supports the option
> + KBUILD_CFLAGS += -mno-apxf
> + endif
As the flag is the same between the two compilers, I think it would be
more readable to do something like:
# Do not generate APX instructions as in-kernel use isn't ready
# Supported by GCC 14+ and LLVM 18+
KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mno-apxf)
I realize this was probably written to intentionally avoid calling
cc-option but I am not sure it is worth micro-optimizing the build like
this. Another option that avoids the separate blocks and cc-option would
be something like:
KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(if $(call gcc-min-version,140000)$(CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG),-mno-apxf)
That said, it is ultimately up to the -tip folks.
> + KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS += -Ctarget-cpu=native $(if $(call rust-min-version,109100),-Ctarget-feature=-apxf,)
The trailing comma is not necessary for this if, it is implicit.
> else
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic
> KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS += -Ctarget-cpu=x86-64 -Ztune-cpu=generic
> --
> 2.51.0
>
--
Cheers,
Nathan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-12 20:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 21:14 Chang S. Bae
2026-07-09 12:36 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-07-14 22:15 ` Chang S. Bae
2026-07-15 10:30 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-07-12 20:25 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260712202538.GA1697833@ax162 \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=omar.avelar@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox