mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei-Lin Chang <weilin.chang@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
	Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama@fujitsu.com>,
	Sebastian Ene <sebastianene@google.com>,
	Wei-Lin Chang <weilin.chang@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 5/6] KVM: arm64: nv: Remove reverse map entries during TLBI handling
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 12:59:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260714115926.2044757-6-weilin.chang@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260714115926.2044757-1-weilin.chang@arm.com>

When a guest hypervisor issues a TLBI for a specific IPA range, KVM
unmaps that range from all the affected shadow stage-2s. During this we
get the opportunity to remove the reverse map, and lower the probability
of creating UNKNOWN_IPA reverse map ranges at subsequent stage-2 faults.

However, the TLBI ranges are specified in nested IPA, so in order to
locate the affected ranges in the reverse map maple tree, which is a
mapping from canonical IPA to nested IPA, we can only iterate through
the entire tree and check each entry.

Suggested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Wei-Lin Chang <weilin.chang@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h |  2 ++
 arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c             | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c           |  3 +++
 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
index 79de224f3438..664d789d17b1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
@@ -77,6 +77,8 @@ extern void kvm_s2_mmu_iterate_by_vmid(struct kvm *kvm, u16 vmid,
 				       const union tlbi_info *info,
 				       void (*)(struct kvm_s2_mmu *,
 						const union tlbi_info *));
+extern void kvm_remove_nested_revmap(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, u64 nested_ipa,
+				     size_t size);
 extern void kvm_record_nested_revmap(gpa_t canonical_ipa, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
 				     gpa_t nested_ipa, size_t map_size);
 extern void kvm_vcpu_load_hw_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
index 22f8a1daca93..cd93793fe89d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
@@ -872,6 +872,43 @@ static struct kvm_s2_mmu *get_s2_mmu_nested(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return s2_mmu;
 }
 
+void kvm_remove_nested_revmap(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, u64 nested_ipa, size_t size)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Iterate through the mt of this mmu, remove all canonical ipa ranges
+	 * with !UNKNOWN_IPA that maps to ranges that are strictly within
+	 * [addr, addr + size).
+	 */
+	struct maple_tree *revmap_mt = &mmu->nested_revmap_mt;
+	u64 entry_val, nested_ipa_end = nested_ipa + size;
+	u64 this_nested_ipa, this_nested_ipa_end;
+	size_t revmap_size;
+	void *entry;
+
+	MA_STATE(mas_rmap, revmap_mt, 0, ULONG_MAX);
+
+	mtree_lock(revmap_mt);
+	mas_for_each(&mas_rmap, entry, ULONG_MAX) {
+		entry_val = xa_to_value(entry);
+		if (unknown_ipa_entry(entry_val))
+			continue;
+
+		revmap_size = mas_rmap.last - mas_rmap.index + 1;
+		this_nested_ipa = entry_val & ADDR_MASK;
+		this_nested_ipa_end = this_nested_ipa + revmap_size;
+
+		if (this_nested_ipa >= nested_ipa &&
+		    this_nested_ipa_end <= nested_ipa_end) {
+			/*
+			 * Ignore result, failure to remove reverse mapping will
+			 * only cause extra unmaps.
+			 */
+			mas_store_gfp(&mas_rmap, NULL, GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
+		}
+	}
+	mtree_unlock(revmap_mt);
+}
+
 void kvm_record_nested_revmap(gpa_t canonical_ipa, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
 			      gpa_t nested_ipa, size_t map_size)
 {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 33c921df19b5..e4ce70508af6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -4006,6 +4006,7 @@ union tlbi_info {
 static void s2_mmu_unmap_range(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
 			       const union tlbi_info *info)
 {
+	kvm_remove_nested_revmap(mmu, info->range.start, info->range.size);
 	/*
 	 * The unmap operation is allowed to drop the MMU lock and block, which
 	 * means that @mmu could be used for a different context than the one
@@ -4104,6 +4105,8 @@ static void s2_mmu_unmap_ipa(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
 	max_size = compute_tlb_inval_range(mmu, info->ipa.addr);
 	base_addr &= ~(max_size - 1);
 
+	kvm_remove_nested_revmap(mmu, base_addr, max_size);
+
 	/*
 	 * See comment in s2_mmu_unmap_range() for why this is allowed to
 	 * reschedule.
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-14 12:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-14 11:59 [PATCH v4 0/6] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement nested stage-2 reverse map Wei-Lin Chang
2026-07-14 11:59 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] KVM: arm64: Use a variable for the canonical GPA in kvm_s2_fault_map() Wei-Lin Chang
2026-07-14 11:59 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] KVM: arm64: nv: Avoid full shadow s2 unmap Wei-Lin Chang
2026-07-16  7:05   ` Oliver Upton
2026-07-16 16:14     ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-07-16 17:16       ` Oliver Upton
2026-07-14 11:59 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] KVM: arm64: nv: Add nested revmap broken tracepoint Wei-Lin Chang
2026-07-16  6:45   ` Oliver Upton
2026-07-16  8:56     ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-16 16:25       ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-07-14 11:59 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_unmap_gfn_range() with common variables Wei-Lin Chang
2026-07-14 11:59 ` Wei-Lin Chang [this message]
2026-07-14 11:59 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] KVM: arm64: nv: Create nested IPA direct map to speed up reverse map removal Wei-Lin Chang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260714115926.2044757-6-weilin.chang@arm.com \
    --to=weilin.chang@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=itaru.kitayama@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=sebastianene@google.com \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox