From: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@kernel.org>,
"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Brendan Jackman" <jackmanb@google.com>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, "Zi Yan" <ziy@nvidia.com>,
"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
"Clark Williams" <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
"Ridong Chen" <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>, "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
"Lorenzo Stoakes" <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/4] mm/page_alloc: rename FPI_TRYLOCK -> FPI_NOLOCK
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 11:03:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260715-spin-trylock-followup-v3-1-fc4d246f705d@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260715-spin-trylock-followup-v3-0-fc4d246f705d@google.com>
As discussed in the linked patch, the there is some inconsistency between
"trylock" and "nolock" nomenclature, let's align it. Since "nolock" is
used in the public API it seems to have more mindshare so do that.
The linked patch did this for the ALLOC_ flag but forgot about FPI_.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260703-alloc-trylock-v5-1-c87b714e19d3@google.com/
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 18 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index af63558391345..c2da85e69a0f8 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ typedef int __bitwise fpi_t;
#define FPI_TO_TAIL ((__force fpi_t)BIT(1))
/* Free the page without taking locks. Rely on trylock only. */
-#define FPI_TRYLOCK ((__force fpi_t)BIT(2))
+#define FPI_NOLOCK ((__force fpi_t)BIT(2))
/* free_pages_prepare() has already been called for page(s) being freed. */
#define FPI_PREPARED ((__force fpi_t)BIT(3))
@@ -1419,7 +1419,7 @@ static __always_inline bool __free_pages_prepare(struct page *page,
page_table_check_free(page, order);
pgalloc_tag_sub(page, 1 << order);
- if (!PageHighMem(page) && !(fpi_flags & FPI_TRYLOCK)) {
+ if (!PageHighMem(page) && !(fpi_flags & FPI_NOLOCK)) {
debug_check_no_locks_freed(page_address(page),
PAGE_SIZE << order);
debug_check_no_obj_freed(page_address(page),
@@ -1558,7 +1558,7 @@ static void free_one_page(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
struct llist_head *llhead;
unsigned long flags;
- if (unlikely(fpi_flags & FPI_TRYLOCK)) {
+ if (unlikely(fpi_flags & FPI_NOLOCK)) {
if (!spin_trylock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags)) {
add_page_to_zone_llist(zone, page, order);
return;
@@ -1569,7 +1569,7 @@ static void free_one_page(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
/* The lock succeeded. Process deferred pages. */
llhead = &zone->trylock_free_pages;
- if (unlikely(!llist_empty(llhead) && !(fpi_flags & FPI_TRYLOCK))) {
+ if (unlikely(!llist_empty(llhead) && !(fpi_flags & FPI_NOLOCK))) {
struct llist_node *llnode;
struct page *p, *tmp;
@@ -2882,7 +2882,7 @@ static bool free_frozen_page_commit(struct zone *zone,
if (pcp->free_count < (batch << CONFIG_PCP_BATCH_SCALE_MAX))
pcp->free_count += (1 << order);
- if (unlikely(fpi_flags & FPI_TRYLOCK)) {
+ if (unlikely(fpi_flags & FPI_NOLOCK)) {
/*
* Do not attempt to take a zone lock. Let pcp->count get
* over high mark temporarily.
@@ -2979,7 +2979,7 @@ static void __free_frozen_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int order,
migratetype = MIGRATE_MOVABLE;
}
- if (unlikely((fpi_flags & FPI_TRYLOCK) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)
+ if (unlikely((fpi_flags & FPI_NOLOCK) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)
&& (in_nmi() || in_hardirq()))) {
add_page_to_zone_llist(zone, page, order);
return;
@@ -3002,7 +3002,7 @@ void free_frozen_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
void free_frozen_pages_nolock(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
{
- __free_frozen_pages(page, order, FPI_TRYLOCK);
+ __free_frozen_pages(page, order, FPI_NOLOCK);
}
/*
@@ -5399,7 +5399,7 @@ struct page *__alloc_frozen_pages_noprof(gfp_t gfp, unsigned int order,
if (memcg_kmem_online() && (gfp & __GFP_ACCOUNT) && page &&
unlikely(__memcg_kmem_charge_page(page, gfp, order) != 0)) {
__free_frozen_pages(page, order,
- alloc_flags & ALLOC_NOLOCK ? FPI_TRYLOCK : 0);
+ alloc_flags & ALLOC_NOLOCK ? FPI_NOLOCK : 0);
page = NULL;
}
@@ -5522,7 +5522,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__free_pages);
*/
void free_pages_nolock(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
{
- ___free_pages(page, order, FPI_TRYLOCK);
+ ___free_pages(page, order, FPI_NOLOCK);
}
/**
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-15 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-15 11:03 [PATCH v3 0/4] mm/page_alloc: couple of followups for recent cleanups Brendan Jackman
2026-07-15 11:03 ` Brendan Jackman [this message]
2026-07-15 13:14 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] mm/page_alloc: rename FPI_TRYLOCK -> FPI_NOLOCK Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-15 11:03 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] cgroup/cpuset: update some comments about the page allocator Brendan Jackman
2026-07-15 13:16 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-17 15:06 ` Waiman Long
2026-07-17 17:23 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-17 17:26 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-17 18:53 ` Andrew Morton
2026-07-17 22:02 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-15 11:03 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] mm/page_alloc: fixup alloc_pages_nolock_noprof() comment Brendan Jackman
2026-07-15 13:17 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-15 11:03 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] mm/page_alloc: remove a couple of VM_BUG_ON()st Brendan Jackman
2026-07-15 13:25 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-15 13:48 ` Brendan Jackman
2026-07-15 13:56 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260715-spin-trylock-followup-v3-1-fc4d246f705d@google.com \
--to=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox