From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, Manuel Ebner <manuelebner@mailbox.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 04/10] doc: RCU: Adopt new coding style of type-aware kmalloc-family - part 2/2
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 17:23:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260716002339.11717-4-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bc69cc01-509e-43f8-a46a-d77946e7adc7@paulmck-laptop>
From: Manuel Ebner <manuelebner@mailbox.org>
Update Documentation/RCU/* to suggest using the new type-aware
kmalloc_obj() per commit 2932ba8d9c99 ("slab: Introduce kmalloc_obj()
and family")
p = kmalloc(...);
-> p = kmalloc_obj(...);
Signed-off-by: Manuel Ebner <manuelebner@mailbox.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
Documentation/RCU/rcu_dereference.rst | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/rcu_dereference.rst b/Documentation/RCU/rcu_dereference.rst
index 2524dcdadde2b8..5bc3785ebfc2ae 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/rcu_dereference.rst
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/rcu_dereference.rst
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ precautions. To see this, consider the following code fragment::
{
struct foo *p;
- p = kmalloc(...);
+ p = kmalloc_obj(*p);
if (p == NULL)
deal_with_it();
p->a = 42; /* Each field in its own cache line. */
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ Then one approach is to use locking, for example, as follows::
{
struct foo *p;
- p = kmalloc(...);
+ p = kmalloc_obj(*p);
if (p == NULL)
deal_with_it();
spin_lock(&p->lock);
--
2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-16 0:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-16 0:23 [PATCH 0/10] Miscellaneous RCU updates for v7.3 Paul E. McKenney
2026-07-16 0:23 ` [PATCH 01/10] rcu-tasks: TASKS_TRACE_RCU doesn't need IRQ_WORK Paul E. McKenney
2026-07-16 0:23 ` [PATCH 02/10] rcu: Use task_state_to_char() in stall-warning prints Paul E. McKenney
2026-07-16 0:23 ` [PATCH 03/10] rcu: Mark __rcu_access_pointer() as context_unsafe() Paul E. McKenney
2026-07-16 0:23 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2026-07-16 0:23 ` [PATCH 05/10] rcu-tasks: Remove unused struct rcu_tasks's->n_ipis_fails variables Paul E. McKenney
2026-07-16 0:23 ` [PATCH 06/10] rcu-tasks: Dump rcu tasks status when the boot-test failed Paul E. McKenney
2026-07-16 0:23 ` [PATCH 07/10] doc: RCU: Fix brackets Paul E. McKenney
2026-07-16 0:23 ` [PATCH 08/10] rcu-tasks: Apply READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() to fix data race Paul E. McKenney
2026-07-16 0:23 ` [PATCH 09/10] rcu-tasks: Remove smp_mb() in rcu_spawn_tasks_kthread_generic() Paul E. McKenney
2026-07-16 0:23 ` [PATCH 10/10] rcu-tasks: Update comments in call_rcu_tasks_generic() Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260716002339.11717-4-paulmck@kernel.org \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manuelebner@mailbox.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome