mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Dudar <main.kalliope@gmail.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	eddyz87@gmail.com, memxor@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	andreas@gaisler.com
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, visitorckw@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, sparc: Add support for BPF_SDIV and BPF_SMOD in the sparc64 JIT
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 11:11:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260716151110.1716607-1-main.kalliope@gmail.com> (raw)

build_insn()'s div/mod emit sites pick DIV/UDIVX by ALU width only,
never by insn->off, so the sparc64 JIT does not implement signed
BPF_SDIV and BPF_SMOD (off == 1). Signed ALU32 and ALU64 div/mod get
an unsigned quotient and remainder rather than the verifier's and the
interpreter's signed result for negative operands.

Emit SDIV/SDIVX on the signed path across the ALU32 and ALU64, X-form
and K-form div/mod sites. The 32-bit signed divide takes a 64-bit
dividend from %y:dst, so sign-fill %y from dst before SDIV where the
unsigned path zeroes it; the 64-bit SDIVX skips the %y write. Route the
signed ALU32 result through do_alu32_trunc, since SDIV does not leave
bits 63:32 clear the way unsigned DIV does.

The verifier and bpf_do_misc_fixups() remove the zero divisor and
INT_MIN / -1 cases before the JIT runs.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Dudar <main.kalliope@gmail.com>
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
---
 arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c b/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c
index 2fa0e9375127..6de9fb29944c 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c
@@ -149,6 +149,8 @@ static u32 WDISP10(u32 off)
 #define MULX		F3(2, 0x09)
 #define UDIVX		F3(2, 0x0d)
 #define DIV		F3(2, 0x0e)
+#define SDIV		F3(2, 0x0f)
+#define SDIVX		F3(2, 0x2d)
 #define SLL		F3(2, 0x25)
 #define SLLX		(F3(2, 0x25)|(1<<12))
 #define SRA		F3(2, 0x27)
@@ -941,32 +943,69 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
 	case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MUL | BPF_X:
 		emit_alu(MULX, src, dst, ctx);
 		break;
-	case BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_X:
+	case BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_X: {
+		const bool is_signed = (off == 1);
+
+		if (is_signed) {
+			const u8 tmp = bpf2sparc[TMP_REG_1];
+
+			ctx->tmp_1_used = true;
+
+			/* Sign-extend dst into %y for 32-bit sdiv. */
+			emit_alu3_K(SRA, dst, 31, tmp, ctx);
+			emit_write_y(tmp, ctx);
+			emit_alu(SDIV, src, dst, ctx);
+			/*
+			 * SDIV does not guarantee the zero-extension that
+			 * the unsigned DIV path relies on, so clear bits
+			 * 63:32 through the shared truncation instead of
+			 * consuming the verifier's zext marker, as the
+			 * other ALU32 ops do.
+			 */
+			goto do_alu32_trunc;
+		}
 		emit_write_y(G0, ctx);
 		emit_alu(DIV, src, dst, ctx);
 		if (insn_is_zext(&insn[1]))
 			return 1;
 		break;
+	}
 	case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_DIV | BPF_X:
-		emit_alu(UDIVX, src, dst, ctx);
+		if (off == 1)
+			emit_alu(SDIVX, src, dst, ctx);
+		else
+			emit_alu(UDIVX, src, dst, ctx);
 		break;
 	case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_X: {
 		const u8 tmp = bpf2sparc[TMP_REG_1];
+		const bool is_signed = (off == 1);
 
 		ctx->tmp_1_used = true;
 
-		emit_write_y(G0, ctx);
-		emit_alu3(DIV, dst, src, tmp, ctx);
+		if (is_signed) {
+			const u8 tmp2 = bpf2sparc[TMP_REG_2];
+
+			ctx->tmp_2_used = true;
+
+			/* Sign-extend dst into %y for 32-bit sdiv. */
+			emit_alu3_K(SRA, dst, 31, tmp2, ctx);
+			emit_write_y(tmp2, ctx);
+			emit_alu3(SDIV, dst, src, tmp, ctx);
+		} else {
+			emit_write_y(G0, ctx);
+			emit_alu3(DIV, dst, src, tmp, ctx);
+		}
 		emit_alu3(MULX, tmp, src, tmp, ctx);
 		emit_alu3(SUB, dst, tmp, dst, ctx);
 		goto do_alu32_trunc;
 	}
 	case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_X: {
 		const u8 tmp = bpf2sparc[TMP_REG_1];
+		const unsigned int mod = (off == 1) ? SDIVX : UDIVX;
 
 		ctx->tmp_1_used = true;
 
-		emit_alu3(UDIVX, dst, src, tmp, ctx);
+		emit_alu3(mod, dst, src, tmp, ctx);
 		emit_alu3(MULX, tmp, src, tmp, ctx);
 		emit_alu3(SUB, dst, tmp, dst, ctx);
 		break;
@@ -1096,33 +1135,62 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
 	case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MUL | BPF_K:
 		emit_alu_K(MULX, dst, imm, ctx);
 		break;
-	case BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_K:
+	case BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_K: {
+		const bool is_signed = (off == 1);
+
 		if (imm == 0)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
-		emit_write_y(G0, ctx);
-		emit_alu_K(DIV, dst, imm, ctx);
+		if (is_signed) {
+			const u8 tmp = bpf2sparc[TMP_REG_2];
+
+			ctx->tmp_2_used = true;
+
+			/* Sign-extend dst into %y for 32-bit sdiv. */
+			emit_alu3_K(SRA, dst, 31, tmp, ctx);
+			emit_write_y(tmp, ctx);
+			emit_alu_K(SDIV, dst, imm, ctx);
+		} else {
+			emit_write_y(G0, ctx);
+			emit_alu_K(DIV, dst, imm, ctx);
+		}
 		goto do_alu32_trunc;
+	}
 	case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_DIV | BPF_K:
 		if (imm == 0)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
-		emit_alu_K(UDIVX, dst, imm, ctx);
+		emit_alu_K((off == 1) ? SDIVX : UDIVX, dst, imm, ctx);
 		break;
 	case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_K:
 	case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_K: {
 		const u8 tmp = bpf2sparc[TMP_REG_2];
+		const bool is_signed = (off == 1);
 		unsigned int div;
 
 		if (imm == 0)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
-		div = (BPF_CLASS(code) == BPF_ALU64) ? UDIVX : DIV;
+		if (BPF_CLASS(code) == BPF_ALU64)
+			div = is_signed ? SDIVX : UDIVX;
+		else
+			div = is_signed ? SDIV : DIV;
 
 		ctx->tmp_2_used = true;
 
-		if (BPF_CLASS(code) != BPF_ALU64)
-			emit_write_y(G0, ctx);
+		if (BPF_CLASS(code) != BPF_ALU64) {
+			if (is_signed) {
+				const u8 tmp3 = bpf2sparc[TMP_REG_3];
+
+				ctx->tmp_3_used = true;
+
+				/* Sign-extend dst into %y for 32-bit sdiv. */
+				emit_alu3_K(SRA, dst, 31, tmp3, ctx);
+				emit_write_y(tmp3, ctx);
+			} else {
+				emit_write_y(G0, ctx);
+			}
+		}
 		if (is_simm13(imm)) {
 			emit(div | IMMED | RS1(dst) | S13(imm) | RD(tmp), ctx);
 			emit(MULX | IMMED | RS1(tmp) | S13(imm) | RD(tmp), ctx);

base-commit: d1f4b56417a3dc1a0600f960b14f46bd25eda89d
-- 
2.34.1


             reply	other threads:[~2026-07-16 15:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-16 15:11 Nicholas Dudar [this message]
2026-07-29  0:33 ` Kuan-Wei Chiu
2026-07-29  1:36   ` Nicholas Dudar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260716151110.1716607-1-main.kalliope@gmail.com \
    --to=main.kalliope@gmail.com \
    --cc=andreas@gaisler.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=visitorckw@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®