mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Mohamed Ayman" <mohamedaymanworkspace@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] coresight: Fix scheduling while atomic in coresight_cpu_pm_notify()
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 22:05:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260716220509.351B01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260716214155.2049564-1-mohamedaymanworkspace@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Calling put_device() inside a raw spinlock atomic context in coresight_put_percpu_source_ref() causes a system crash on PREEMPT_RT.
- [High] Double-decrement of hardware refcounts for links/sinks when a device is unregistered while the CPU is idle.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v3] coresight: Fix scheduling while atomic in coresight_cpu_pm_notify() ---
commit cbdaaaf0779f6cae5c8595e4a2bcad24b819e017
Author: Mohamed Ayman <mohamedaymanworkspace@gmail.com>

coresight: Fix scheduling while atomic in coresight_cpu_pm_notify()

This commit modifies coresight_cpu_get_active_path() to avoid calling
coresight_get_percpu_source_ref() and coresight_put_percpu_source_ref()
during CPU PM transitions. Instead, it reads the per-cpu source pointer
directly under the coresight_dev_lock raw spinlock to prevent potential
sleeping in atomic context on PREEMPT_RT.

> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
> index 6d65c43d574fd..713bcff53bf4f 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
> @@ -1850,25 +1850,15 @@ static void coresight_release_device_list(void)
>  static struct coresight_path *coresight_cpu_get_active_path(enum cs_mode mode)
>  {
>  	struct coresight_device *source;
> -	bool is_active = false;
> +	struct coresight_path *path = NULL;
>  
> -	source = coresight_get_percpu_source_ref(smp_processor_id());
> -	if (!source)
> -		return NULL;
> -
> -	if (coresight_get_mode(source) & mode)
> -		is_active = true;
> +	guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave)(&coresight_dev_lock);
>  
> -	coresight_put_percpu_source_ref(source);

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but while this change fixes the
issue for the PM notifier by removing the get/put dance, does the same
"scheduling while atomic" problem still exist in
coresight_put_percpu_source_ref() for other callers?

In coresight_put_percpu_source_ref():

	guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave)(&coresight_dev_lock);
	...
	put_device(&csdev->dev);

This unconditionally acquires coresight_dev_lock as a raw spinlock and calls
put_device(). If concurrent device unregistration occurs, this put_device()
call can drop the final kobject reference, triggering
coresight_device_release().

This calls free_percpu(), which acquires sleepable locks on PREEMPT_RT,
causing a panic. Are there plans to address this remaining put_device()
call under a raw spinlock?

> +	source = per_cpu(csdev_source, smp_processor_id());
> +	if (source && (coresight_get_mode(source) & mode))
> +		path = source->path;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * It is expected to run in atomic context or with the CPU lock held for
> -	 * sysfs mode, so it cannot be preempted to disable the path. Here
> -	 * returns the active path pointer without concern that its state may
> -	 * change. Since the build path has taken a reference on the component,
> -	 * the path can be safely used by the caller.
> -	 */
> -	return is_active ? source->path : NULL;
> +	return path;
>  }

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this PM logic cause a permanent
double-decrement of hardware refcounts if a trace device is unregistered
while the CPU is idle?

When the CPU goes idle, coresight_cpu_pm_notify() runs CPU_PM_ENTER and calls
coresight_pm_save(path). This disables components along the active trace path
and decrements their reference counts.

If the trace driver is concurrently unbound on another CPU,
coresight_unregister() clears the csdev_source per-CPU pointer.

When the idle CPU wakes up, coresight_cpu_pm_notify(CPU_PM_EXIT) calls
coresight_cpu_get_active_path(). Because the pointer was cleared, this
returns NULL.

Consequently, coresight_pm_restore() is skipped, and the hardware refcounts
are never incremented back:

	struct coresight_path *path =
		coresight_cpu_get_active_path(CS_MODE_SYSFS | CS_MODE_PERF);
	int ret;

	ret = coresight_pm_is_needed(path); // returns 0 if path is NULL
	if (ret <= 0)
		return ret ? NOTIFY_BAD : NOTIFY_DONE; // Skips restore

When the trace session is later explicitly closed, coresight_disable_path()
executes and decrements those refcounts again.

Does this cause an underflow that permanently disables shared hardware
components for all cores?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260716214155.2049564-1-mohamedaymanworkspace@gmail.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-16 22:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-12 21:04 [PATCH] coresight: Fix scheduling while atomic in coresight_device_release() Mohamed Ayman
2026-07-12 21:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13  3:07 ` Jie Gan
2026-07-13 23:00 ` [PATCH v2] coresight: Fix scheduling while atomic in coresight_put_percpu_source_ref() Mohamed Ayman
2026-07-13 23:17   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-14 10:42   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-07-14 19:42     ` MOHAMED AYMAN
2026-07-15  6:58       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-07-16  3:07         ` MOHAMED AYMAN
2026-07-16 12:32           ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-07-16 21:41 ` [PATCH v3] coresight: Fix scheduling while atomic in coresight_cpu_pm_notify() Mohamed Ayman
2026-07-16 22:05   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-17  8:14   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-07-17 10:49     ` Leo Yan
2026-07-17 15:58   ` Leo Yan
2026-07-17 16:12     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260716220509.351B01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mohamedaymanworkspace@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox