From: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@kernel.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: group controller delay tables
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 11:33:57 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260717-submit-sunxi-nand-h6-h616-timings-v2-1-225515107640@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260717-submit-sunxi-nand-h6-h616-timings-v2-0-225515107640@gmail.com>
The tWB and tRHW timing field encodings are controller properties, but
they currently live in standalone lookup tables.
Group them in a timing descriptor selected through the controller
capability data. Point every existing controller at the legacy values so
this is a pure preparation change.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
index 02647565c8ba..d12cbb3c813c 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
@@ -237,6 +237,14 @@ struct sunxi_nand_hw_ecc {
u32 ecc_ctl;
};
+#define SUNXI_NFC_TIMING_STEPS 4
+
+/* Delay arrays contain internal NDFC clock cycles for field values 0 to 3. */
+struct sunxi_nfc_timings {
+ s32 tWB[SUNXI_NFC_TIMING_STEPS];
+ s32 tRHW[SUNXI_NFC_TIMING_STEPS];
+};
+
/**
* struct sunxi_nand_chip - stores NAND chip device related information
*
@@ -301,6 +309,7 @@ static inline struct sunxi_nand_chip *to_sunxi_nand(struct nand_chip *nand)
* bytes to write
* @nuser_data_tab: Size of @user_data_len_tab
* @sram_size: Size of the NAND controller SRAM
+ * @timings: Controller timing characteristics
*/
struct sunxi_nfc_caps {
bool has_mdma;
@@ -327,6 +336,7 @@ struct sunxi_nfc_caps {
unsigned int nuser_data_tab;
unsigned int max_ecc_steps;
int sram_size;
+ const struct sunxi_nfc_timings *timings;
};
/**
@@ -1667,8 +1677,10 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_ecc_write_oob(struct nand_chip *nand, int page)
return nand_prog_page_end_op(nand);
}
-static const s32 tWB_lut[] = {6, 12, 16, 20};
-static const s32 tRHW_lut[] = {4, 8, 12, 20};
+static const struct sunxi_nfc_timings sun4i_a10_nfc_timings = {
+ .tWB = { 6, 12, 16, 20 },
+ .tRHW = { 4, 8, 12, 20 },
+};
static int _sunxi_nand_lookup_timing(const s32 *lut, int lut_size, u32 duration,
u32 clk_period)
@@ -1693,6 +1705,7 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_setup_interface(struct nand_chip *nand, int csline,
{
struct sunxi_nand_chip *sunxi_nand = to_sunxi_nand(nand);
struct sunxi_nfc *nfc = to_sunxi_nfc(sunxi_nand->nand.controller);
+ const struct sunxi_nfc_timings *nfc_timings = nfc->caps->timings;
const struct nand_sdr_timings *timings;
u32 min_clk_period = 0;
s32 tWB, tADL, tWHR, tRHW, tCAD;
@@ -1763,8 +1776,10 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_setup_interface(struct nand_chip *nand, int csline,
min_clk_period = DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tWC_min, 2);
/* T16 - T19 + tCAD */
- if (timings->tWB_max > (min_clk_period * 20))
- min_clk_period = DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tWB_max, 20);
+ if (timings->tWB_max >
+ (min_clk_period * nfc_timings->tWB[SUNXI_NFC_TIMING_STEPS - 1]))
+ min_clk_period = DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tWB_max,
+ nfc_timings->tWB[SUNXI_NFC_TIMING_STEPS - 1]);
if (timings->tADL_min > (min_clk_period * 32))
min_clk_period = DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tADL_min, 32);
@@ -1772,8 +1787,10 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_setup_interface(struct nand_chip *nand, int csline,
if (timings->tWHR_min > (min_clk_period * 32))
min_clk_period = DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tWHR_min, 32);
- if (timings->tRHW_min > (min_clk_period * 20))
- min_clk_period = DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tRHW_min, 20);
+ if (timings->tRHW_min >
+ (min_clk_period * nfc_timings->tRHW[SUNXI_NFC_TIMING_STEPS - 1]))
+ min_clk_period = DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tRHW_min,
+ nfc_timings->tRHW[SUNXI_NFC_TIMING_STEPS - 1]);
/*
* In non-EDO, tREA should be less than tRP to guarantee that the
@@ -1789,7 +1806,7 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_setup_interface(struct nand_chip *nand, int csline,
if (timings->tREA_max > min_clk_period && !timings->tRLOH_min)
min_clk_period = timings->tREA_max;
- tWB = sunxi_nand_lookup_timing(tWB_lut, timings->tWB_max,
+ tWB = sunxi_nand_lookup_timing(nfc_timings->tWB, timings->tWB_max,
min_clk_period);
if (tWB < 0) {
dev_err(nfc->dev, "unsupported tWB\n");
@@ -1808,7 +1825,7 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_setup_interface(struct nand_chip *nand, int csline,
return -EINVAL;
}
- tRHW = sunxi_nand_lookup_timing(tRHW_lut, timings->tRHW_min,
+ tRHW = sunxi_nand_lookup_timing(nfc_timings->tRHW, timings->tRHW_min,
min_clk_period);
if (tRHW < 0) {
dev_err(nfc->dev, "unsupported tRHW\n");
@@ -2595,6 +2612,7 @@ static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a10_caps = {
.nstrengths = ARRAY_SIZE(sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10),
.max_ecc_steps = 16,
.sram_size = 1024,
+ .timings = &sun4i_a10_nfc_timings,
};
static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a23_caps = {
@@ -2617,6 +2635,7 @@ static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_a23_caps = {
.nstrengths = ARRAY_SIZE(sunxi_ecc_strengths_a10),
.max_ecc_steps = 16,
.sram_size = 1024,
+ .timings = &sun4i_a10_nfc_timings,
};
static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_h616_caps = {
@@ -2641,6 +2660,7 @@ static const struct sunxi_nfc_caps sunxi_nfc_h616_caps = {
.nuser_data_tab = ARRAY_SIZE(sunxi_user_data_len_h6),
.max_ecc_steps = 32,
.sram_size = 8192,
+ .timings = &sun4i_a10_nfc_timings,
};
static const struct of_device_id sunxi_nfc_ids[] = {
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-17 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-17 17:33 [PATCH v2 0/3] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: fix H6/H616 controller timings James Hilliard
2026-07-17 17:33 ` James Hilliard [this message]
2026-07-17 17:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: describe tADL and tWHR delays James Hilliard
2026-07-17 17:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: fix H6/H616 controller timings James Hilliard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260717-submit-sunxi-nand-h6-h616-timings-v2-1-225515107640@gmail.com \
--to=james.hilliard1@gmail.com \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard.genoud@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=wens@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox