From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F2E53B14D4; Sun, 19 Jul 2026 23:12:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784502724; cv=none; b=iIeCDZclEY/HJr+HMKQO4r6eKSsceRp2TJrbjzP2eNnq3gVMHCIlCfttTnLsTxBRIXeZQiDeEyGHqGZd2weaXPm3Zr9f5Mxuj9C3SbIM3tdXJJvozWBSqIe1pOAM3+VKIRDhOyg5AYq7sPpP1JA0UZbaDkYPn+isTSt28WQYWYY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784502724; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3zzAFIxW4QntGIfc+v0S58ciMfKRPipxII9rhMorBnU=; h=From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=WuwLx2tDmpxtGonTdyO4mSIZ5cXNOKG/sheUOCfse3NXNdz7fh/qBPfdStnPDpdiv0f/2tpQrobApHOt9xiqwRDT1OMJ3YDISQG9CHFSnJTh6VtJuyqujHzPkrHlYU37E46TgI45k1Z87RXzYxeMtwsqG4r6NmuHM2ybC4jCHCQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=WdEWLgim; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="WdEWLgim" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F3DC1F00A3A; Sun, 19 Jul 2026 23:11:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1784502723; bh=V9/QBsgUl+YAHSU3KRVgzfp7o3z60FnCLy+stiPlLsM=; h=From:Date:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=WdEWLgimdUnWOOMh7FlriNY5lB2TMDa7fzH5p8GdEXBClHyHlkgeLOYDw8BDUkGGP Yuj416Tx9I3dwbAJa1JeMc5LYada72J7fxsTKb8CPnFHL9vJYEpbqxsCQOg7aMG1hi hyoTxbfjfpk26uDaubCPqQ/oRXoFFnHLbfmQ+UTP+r7GFW5L+jI62yPOQxW3ckXyss Z5+iUf0aip6JDmGutBekHnVQPdvnqX9Yk692nG0AWDM7JAzEtqQ06CBI0QtT0QpwLg H2F0KMN4ov7a1Nakx0FGTwo42gla5yYn3gPObx/ZnNM6XhmdVHU5HEy8aLny8x9paC bgzIp18v0KqVA== From: Mark Brown Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:07:56 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v13 29/32] KVM: arm64: selftests: Remove spurious check for single bit safe values Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20260720-kvm-arm64-sme-v13-29-d9abd3ffa245@kernel.org> References: <20260720-kvm-arm64-sme-v13-0-d9abd3ffa245@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260720-kvm-arm64-sme-v13-0-d9abd3ffa245@kernel.org> To: Marc Zyngier , Joey Gouly , Catalin Marinas , Suzuki K Poulose , Will Deacon , Paolo Bonzini , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Oliver Upton Cc: Dave Martin , Fuad Tabba , Mark Rutland , Ben Horgan , Jean-Philippe Brucker , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Peter Maydell , Eric Auger , Mark Brown X-Mailer: b4 0.16-dev X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=openpgp-sha256; l=1200; i=broonie@kernel.org; h=from:subject:message-id; bh=3zzAFIxW4QntGIfc+v0S58ciMfKRPipxII9rhMorBnU=; b=owEBbQGS/pANAwAKASTWi3JdVIfQAcsmYgBqXVk+i+hoFBVdo38ozyAZpmD7uyLRsmokr6on0 fvkE/s4sISJATMEAAEKAB0WIQSt5miqZ1cYtZ/in+ok1otyXVSH0AUCal1ZPgAKCRAk1otyXVSH 0OZAB/4+liUc/7Segb5Y98e5swH5Q6abXU8BYD9Up2joacK6G3YdivbA7aQZrxhqP3HgvrAHH2S YTOoePIimv09sem9sOv23eUrx6fk8bEqNogZya4N4P/ate5M9m5kZ3kP9BjhaXgVtwj994o0h9g 2I/zqxMSggIJCnKsU+husmvow72vRFhpCkHOdxVgVM4CdJHow8i9uR1mbLsdAISjd4go0oeu7Vc WVpqqHZm+B9cntnQBFpYdrgRKyXGP3YKPYYX92P4CXjgU654VHF/D8oD3XTGP3xXEMfv+PF8pyw ZivDGw/E+XryeI+5WhQ5Rbev+pALkxLlbNPNyXN5krbnr+Na X-Developer-Key: i=broonie@kernel.org; a=openpgp; fpr=3F2568AAC26998F9E813A1C5C3F436CA30F5D8EB get_safe_value() currently asserts that bitfields it is generating a safe value for must be more than one bit wide but in actual fact it should always be possible to generate a safe value to write to a bitfield even if it is just the current value and the function correctly handles that. Remove the assert. Fixes: bf09ee918053e ("KVM: arm64: selftests: Remove ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_BITS and its last user") Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c index 7429a1055df5..9eceac84e297 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c @@ -279,8 +279,6 @@ u64 get_safe_value(const struct reg_ftr_bits *ftr_bits, u64 ftr) { u64 ftr_max = ftr_bits->mask >> ftr_bits->shift; - TEST_ASSERT(ftr_max > 1, "This test doesn't support single bit features"); - if (ftr_bits->sign == FTR_UNSIGNED) { switch (ftr_bits->type) { case FTR_EXACT: -- 2.47.3