From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fscrypt: Add missing superblock check in find_or_insert_direct_key()
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 10:46:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720174626.GD1865@quark> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260719033120.122120-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>
On Sat, Jul 18, 2026 at 08:31:20PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> The legacy 'fscrypt_direct_keys' table caches master keys that are used
> by v1 encryption policies that have FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_DIRECT_KEY.
> It's just a global table for all filesystems (since the keys can be
> provided by the legacy process-subscribed keyrings mechanism, which
> makes it difficult to reuse super_block::s_master_keys).
>
> The entries in it ('struct fscrypt_direct_key') do contain a super_block
> pointer, though, for passing to fscrypt_destroy_inline_crypt_key() when
> the last inode that references the key is evicted.
>
> However, when finding the fscrypt_direct_key for an inode, we weren't
> actually comparing the super_block pointer. As a result, inodes with
> different super_blocks could point to the same fscrypt_direct_key. That
> could extend the lifetime of a fscrypt_direct_key beyond the
> super_block it points to, causing a use-after-free later.
>
> Fix this by creating distinct fscrypt_direct_key structs for distinct
> super_block structs.
>
> Note that this problem doesn't exist in the v2 policy equivalent
> ("per-mode keys"), since the data structures there are per super_block.
>
> Fixes: 22e9947a4b2b ("fscrypt: stop holding extra request_queue references")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/fscrypt/linux.git/log/?h=for-current
- Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-19 3:31 Eric Biggers
2026-07-20 9:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-20 17:46 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260720174626.GD1865@quark \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome