mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>, Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
	Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Tristan Ye <tristan.ye@oracle.com>,
	ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ocfs2: free unused clusters on defrag move errors
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:15:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720181535.158f43328e1f6c3d2036352e@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720141944.485212-1-lgs201920130244@gmail.com>

On Mon, 20 Jul 2026 22:19:43 +0800 Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com> wrote:

> ocfs2_defrag_extent() claims new clusters before calling
> __ocfs2_move_extent(). If the move fails before ocfs2_split_extent()
> succeeds, the claimed clusters are not referenced by the inode and must
> be released.
> 
> The current error path only logs the error and continues to
> ocfs2_cow_sync_writeback(), which can overwrite the original error with
> zero and leave the claimed clusters allocated.
> 
> Not every __ocfs2_move_extent() error can free the new clusters. Once
> ocfs2_split_extent() succeeds, the extent tree references them even if
> ocfs2_decrease_refcount() or ocfs2_truncate_log_append() subsequently
> fails. Freeing the clusters in that case would leave the extent tree
> pointing to clusters marked free.
> 
> context->new_phys_cpos is updated immediately after a successful extent
> split. Compare it with the newly claimed physical cluster on error. If
> they differ, the split for the current move did not complete and the
> claimed clusters can be freed. If they match, leave the clusters
> allocated because the extent tree already references them.
> 
> Return move errors through the transaction cleanup path so that the
> original error is preserved instead of being overwritten by writeback.

Thanks.  AI review has flagged a couple of possible issues with this
change.  Please check?

	https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260720141944.485212-1-lgs201920130244@gmail.com


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-21  1:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-20 14:19 Guangshuo Li
2026-07-21  1:08 ` Joseph Qi
2026-07-21  1:15 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2026-07-21  3:16   ` Joseph Qi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260720181535.158f43328e1f6c3d2036352e@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=lgs201920130244@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark@fasheh.com \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tristan.ye@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®