From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f43.google.com (mail-wm1-f43.google.com [209.85.128.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47381247291 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:06:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.43 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784678810; cv=none; b=Gmy4opD1kXr3zqDlKLzsB0wjZf/VmGb9ciDtHfGwkviYG3yPfK+TAdygR48zTAjtXDLW4YB2UFfzZf4t+Gpy8NABHcornBEimjXY/ZpqaFd40e/i7c2QdBBJjeZK/xQrt1GPLOSAB0GuX0uLKjLf+4rg9pDT6F57hG6I16yzeGc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784678810; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QWwErNpqv9uWN9rVARPXI2DK95qHDaFyOvIjdYDloX8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=fsiPqcBZdVAweE4TUBIhv3Zi0GNLyGUGtXuAAQEG7hUqG3CeYAafNO8mQoXt2k01ypA3gXkghv5j0wYDBBcIBJAf15FyK+6ubO7a0PC2u64BJS1hm7TPDXuwvRMD5e4t8ce4TwL65ZyKlwJDuBO3HGBILpjw1xyP98p992AJubg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=SjLWDDqJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.43 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="SjLWDDqJ" Received: by mail-wm1-f43.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-49553515a8bso40046965e9.1 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 17:06:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1784678803; x=1785283603; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=QWwErNpqv9uWN9rVARPXI2DK95qHDaFyOvIjdYDloX8=; b=SjLWDDqJEly9VvgFcLBjbd7/qt2VNMOcvnJyV7ngpmGSVMSnshLVT2USgpg8yF9UL6 WSZ5dq6nt+eP7wCh/6Mdox28cViJgSuuT5S+J4xGIcGKwKdvJb6r981lBJcfFWqGSgtT +T7J5fn8lOLhPPk6XwVBzKYM1O+J2YWPCpl0KN3z77TlU4DG5vnh2E9tDNZizrvHVEX5 OSZ7A7nAO0II3j92zlS9i4dfjXIAV1sw1oRWS3OrpkLmoy081IG96D3+H0zewhmxQs5D vLLhuuijcrKzktc8voYg+/eA39/ELonXXBFJdMAiYSnguS1yEPpaETvuPUQV6fkOEO3H F2yw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1784678803; x=1785283603; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=QWwErNpqv9uWN9rVARPXI2DK95qHDaFyOvIjdYDloX8=; b=oHG6sKLhLqedhABD+S2wfx+j0yNJrqJv6UnMsBhGW7kXpF9lfqu/AAjlD7tJwFwzrO JN2iEp3LRgRfiU/3+VLMge70WcOpBmR2EcKPIukFw6R6WSyLBXntYtdL21hE7jmtZldf 92iY8TFeuSRnGa3QLf4/z1NTkO/I4nb4B4pIxr2DPQSklAF3dnLWfnxmuzaeOtO7eVXd EGAoxTQKoZd0ur5A2x9fDWEF6Ot+eo3ytRHymb6iUwsnYmOfecMMn1Az7ERRQo9eiS7t zoGxu875D+rSolEtoSXK49/xr8M0jwQ6QSddEPm6KgBXRnekNTUPmnCCJbKiILvt7IFx Q/gg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AHgh+RrEWozvSIJ78yWAWFqKntUm10T9bbkO6Ae/LOrKyFL+ikR9t+RbZZWXrBwQ6sv+F+Z5nz1qSCg2hWVcgZw=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzJio6jwuOLJ25gSzPKjB/l+FvTQaQDB5zsNYhuPpVy36k0j3OI CqPyAv1ZJl2pI4EqNjHNSzAdDFWuNHTZlrnzk2kjm4bhv18KoVPLqYJM X-Gm-Gg: AR+sD12K1BkVcOBE62kMXs5wriPTDmg4r0KDrjHf6hViEiVJWwr0TdE1bPGpdcjg/7T QZpj3buaxM3r5RhRGE3X28PCLswHIdqcEZZSFA9j8y95wzEkYnVNeYN8DwZ78QlhIJUaI6GDTCF HkpEACuv8Q3WW+ph3VtSaKaK7uoa0ZbfVht8vx2vHHjqmSecdVWNY6Gdnh3N4pKHoD7/WWwaESt bKxDC/MEXFfpT8Vh7v+036e4BqL4awlvc/RV5FU9P4N1slwYsRdCighEzLse390Z/zeBaudPWAw fS8VMh5+RdCIZ8WBDER8eJ3u+xp2f1T19Y+99P3zY4EozLb3lRjTb0YkNQE6WwNG2OlIKeSLBOw XyLdrPEC0oN/A76ycO+ECOdlovz9Vg9iUwbzO8cHybyUM0rmMqKt0E+CmuZIJktLVuKTmM9yI+V OSB9KHp56J0ukJdJvfucHCtiRlE8ULQ+N7zIX6fZcrvq4aa3nXZZjrT9NT0zzjXmI1yhH9asvx X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3b26:b0:493:aab3:c09c with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4954a40bbe9mr236184355e9.28.1784678803084; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 17:06:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from c64.fritz.box (p200301048f0fe900a0f9605663da8872.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:104:8f0f:e900:a0f9:6056:63da:8872]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-4956a6354a3sm43335235e9.10.2026.07.21.17.06.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 21 Jul 2026 17:06:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Saverio Miroddi To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Len Brown , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: bus: Avoid misleading _OSC missing-feature errors Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 02:06:32 +0200 Message-ID: <20260722000632.2285535-1-saverio.pub2@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.54.0 In-Reply-To: <20260722001452.019b3e32@jic23-huawei> References: <20260722001452.019b3e32@jic23-huawei> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi! Yes, that's my understanding, with one qualification: we can only infer this from the returned buffer. The returned capability mask acknowledges every capability requested by OSPM, while OSC_CAPABILITIES_MASK_ERROR says that at least one requested bit was cleared. Since the requested and returned masks are identical, those two parts of the response are inconsistent. The protocol-visible result acknowledges all requested capabilities, so the status bit appears to be a firmware bug. I'll clarify this in the comment. For the logging, I'll keep "_OSC: errors while processing control request" for every error return and condition only "_OSC: some features may be missing". That preserves the firmware error report without claiming that capabilities were removed. Best, Saverio