From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f46.google.com (mail-wr1-f46.google.com [209.85.221.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FE7B3DB62A for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2026 21:02:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.46 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784840535; cv=none; b=MNIRkAbTNZkdHnzIw0e9dU/WekKHlKj5YE0YtQTtkyWi+49F/GfyM8Bt4wEoTjEixbG2SimHn7F+9uDnvWf61m5Iz+wvZOXSEo5qgYFrxS7eq76EgKnGEFW1G7iFiwGlpx0uhaIdAmYnO0+evOQr1qCmuJxzGrfty5Wet+d4SHo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784840535; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oSYYRF992xkNBj38UQH7xncuI48YTdNanxBrkb/gvBM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZgXcnySHfX1KJrsg3DdI1j4Wt7nJ1vYa7Hnl4X5m8YueRVqs6BoFxgOPyaiY7H5DjY6Zpc98GdEVdhUTxbTrBt+DR0gTPMDw5yqZA7j+CTvkiiKVAs1bZTEQKofLQacPkPrXaEmOT49+X+TGIB7Od0mX57gfEznXPyaG2NhOoBU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=CGWAHvfN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.46 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="CGWAHvfN" Received: by mail-wr1-f46.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-47ddf7b09e5so1159115f8f.1 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:02:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1784840531; x=1785445331; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:mime-version:references :in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=WrydZRpK44o17ihkahW3T+469O/DVylnzq9QG5iYeEE=; b=CGWAHvfNld7XhK4Z2WrpC57jFnQqYhEPB/Tyx3MmyVTifFCT1LN2OtUui8+xq76uFq +i2i0v1PBTPCKYCYjD9Igpy4KamP1SaHFrArp5k34sBlKlaL8DT2ZToulyOXDF2UOekb e5PSYxmVFulVHtG6JA81FYxt8/mm9v51xI37w7E//UnVWuWxrRAZLmSCFNOVL9Q/KgUc Uir+R8BLscjov5pyVMCvhHO6BWzSNpv5697yj44ipbjMsr5P1PKbl481xg9muKawuLo8 y+rxT6YkXuI5MCVZ1HjWTd8bWIBs4lisvy9leKUsKKGCkKSMacZTWSKaUkaxKWMaNEWt V7HA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1784840531; x=1785445331; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:mime-version:references :in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=WrydZRpK44o17ihkahW3T+469O/DVylnzq9QG5iYeEE=; b=ASV3a15Nw1kIn3uAQDhfvQYlgpSI05xARDbDmYTxj75LkQSL9JeBxQGAx1n+suWVJn fUWTRVS9eeqWjp7i6PwUk3pLj+DSxuhq2yv/KR0Yls49zyhdinv14hI5fo/LJ3fwYGN9 kzzS71DJz4rLClqtc9E9nOLyafla9D/YDoC5MuyoGVtgPi6Zw1k3js2FjaBwq4SIq5+U phFbGA5TPUDKC/flAwkPhOgH4iK5JBFCZmkPlRS2Dk8MWt9a6GswbFCc0/ZrlFnDfvRl jjxY1guCMJiQOGnszJ8EdI8lIfYf6B/oC47rBdZ9m8lt8qlrBTGDRJ6qAvCLQJa+OyMV pmJQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AHgh+Rq/ieRrmgeQvKKclXE+0BiAQ7FbzuS4y1RnnAGR7NQ2bIT0e+v2/ivVFZXmf1+M9COPFC4s9UzSm9wvoMY=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzsfGpaCbD2ZYjgCKCSxuSr9tjjgmoPLNxZkXyKWcX7JW9WPcup 8y81AIVSGtLlKXOAalzx4JpiLemQeaAxuH7DfKa1aA14UA/M0NC5Us1k X-Gm-Gg: AR+sD127N5yWDExkqKVYisL+dNyE7LJr3lwElXHBRaxMTTDoGTTZr7n+EMvsQlXYMxj t5uXxBSFJzoVQ8nGCBpKFK1foR0Q3CEzxBz0PqBO5vgelhSrik6+yPFQBKt+Swnr0UkG9R+Oq0G eBfq082TJLZbQu7gqzWt0feJiXH1f03q9KzpiThRXrgw96iQStgrMraoXVHiQcz2Wcgb1nOjUNT YUJ1Ku6NEt33bP6lXmWIAm/JUO3TGh/Evt3YsASE4/y+IveQoeNuKnQ5fs4fdh4/4LQe0qvWdPi AuCuenKaCboKthQWXLCCUgJsChd+wS8BfOYsUMSbDzuqUaykGtm7kLNCANuN8KR6tyCotOwoqeZ 6Dmu4gOisPnIECTGixo7A5vpCzFaaiB8k/2dXQCVUogvKi/i9FdgnqNDdFaREf828APOzfG1EHy 1RSdKkBjA+a+EIeLzi2VGT9MSiFSbmxLBHW/rkFEtsSZPzfDI+7ZgyUXSRZfNvNymRl+TnPcL6K P1dpJCif9+CjvcqRKwTHaMtSehscaOnJGakRBOqu88fgGs9Rj0bYH9fN36GCbZTzcFrP/KMFRkW 0adulxW8JHkkdSsRscedVwSuKPr4lkl585tM46yD+VZeF91xu3ZDZuAe6l22tnJrcwYXABi62Zy rU0SGj76GmRY= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:29d1:b0:47f:91eb:342 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-47f91eb0469mr3353431f8f.13.1784840530953; Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:02:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from systembl0wer (ip-86-49-244-181.bb.vodafone.cz. [86.49.244.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-47f85c7880dsm19445591f8f.37.2026.07.23.14.02.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:02:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 23:02:09 +0200 From: Joshua Crofts To: Ariana Lazar Cc: Jonathan Cameron , David Lechner , Nuno =?UTF-8?B?U8Oh?= , "Andy Shevchenko" , Rob Herring , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , Conor Dooley , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] iio: dac: add support for Microchip MCP48FEB02 Message-ID: <20260723230209.05c9f482@systembl0wer> In-Reply-To: <20260723-mcp47feb02_refactor-v1-3-ee59e63672bc@microchip.com> References: <20260723-mcp47feb02_refactor-v1-0-ee59e63672bc@microchip.com> <20260723-mcp47feb02_refactor-v1-3-ee59e63672bc@microchip.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.4.0 (GTK 3.24.52; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 23 Jul 2026 16:43:12 +0300 Ariana Lazar wrote: > This is the iio driver for Microchip MCP48FxBy1/2/4/8 series of > buffered voltage output Digital-to-Analog Converters with nonvolatile or > volatile memory and an SPI Interface. > > The families support up to 8 output channels. > > The devices can be 8-bit, 10-bit and 12-bit. > > Signed-off-by: Ariana Lazar > --- ... > +#include No need to include device.h, as struct device * is an opaque pointer. Instead, add dev_printk.h as you're using dev_err_probe(). > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include Don't include mod_devicetable.h, this header has recently been added to spi.h, thanks to the effort of Uwe Kleine-Konig. > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +#include "mcp47feb02.h" > + ... > + > +static int mcp47feb02_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi) > +{ > + const struct mcp47feb02_features *chip_features; > + struct device *dev = &spi->dev; > + struct regmap *regmap; > + > + chip_features = spi_get_device_match_data(spi); > + if (!chip_features) > + return -EINVAL; What about returning dev_err_probe() and -ENODEV instead of -EINVAL? It's about 50-50 in the kernel but -ENODEV seems more suitable as an error code if spi_get_device_match_data() fails. -- Kind regards, Joshua Crofts