From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: changfengnan <changfengnan@bytedance.com>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Jun Zeng <jun1.zeng@intel.com>,
Gang Cao <gang.cao@intel.com>, Jun I Jin <jun.i.jin@intel.com>,
Liang A Fang <liang.a.fang@intel.com>,
Yong Hu <yong.hu@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Guzebing <guzebing@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] nvme-pci: adaptively poll completions on busy queues
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 06:44:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260728044409.GA20140@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d9210bcdf73fbe1ac8b6ec132865609a3ed68688.2c741811.b6d1.4c47.8747.ba7d54957ca3@bytedance.com>
On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 10:24:52AM +0800, changfengnan wrote:
> The patch showed 50 confirmed throughput improvements, with a median gain of 25.2%
> and a maximum gain of 63.0%. Only five cases showed confirmed regressions;
Can you drill down into the regression and figure out why they happen
and if we can mitigate them? It would be nice if we could find a way
to avoid major regressions and enable the adaptive mode by default.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-28 4:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-23 12:05 Fengnan Chang
2026-07-23 12:14 ` changfengnan
2026-07-23 14:46 ` Keith Busch
2026-07-28 2:24 ` changfengnan
2026-07-28 4:44 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-07-28 6:19 ` changfengnan
2026-08-06 3:12 ` changfengnan
2026-08-06 21:18 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-08-07 2:18 ` changfengnan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260728044409.GA20140@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=changfengnan@bytedance.com \
--cc=gang.cao@intel.com \
--cc=guzebing@bytedance.com \
--cc=jun.i.jin@intel.com \
--cc=jun1.zeng@intel.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=liang.a.fang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=yong.hu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®