mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Harry Yoo (Oracle)" <harry@kernel.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>,  Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	 Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	 Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	 Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
	Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>,
	 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	 Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	 Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	 Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
	 Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
	 Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>,
	 Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	 Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>,  Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	 Shengming Hu <hu.shengming@zte.com.cn>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org,  "Harry Yoo (Oracle)" <harry@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 5/8] mm/slab: allow kfree_rcu_sheaf() on PREEMPT_RT
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 17:20:13 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260729-kfree_rcu_nolock-v5-5-a28cdcda9673@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260729-kfree_rcu_nolock-v5-0-a28cdcda9673@kernel.org>

As suggested by Vlastimil Babka [1], kfree_rcu_sheaf() can be used
on PREEMPT_RT if we always assume spinning is not allowed on PREEMPT_RT.
This is because local_trylock and spinlock_t are safe to use with
trylock and unlock as long as the kernel does not spin and the context
is not NMI and not hardirq.

Now that __kfree_rcu_sheaf() knows how to handle SLAB_FREE_NOLOCK,
relax the limitation and try the sheaves path on PREEMPT_RT as well.

Keep the lockdep map on non RT kernels. However, do not use the lockdep
map on PREEMPT_RT to avoid suppressing valid lockdep warnings.

As pointed by Vlastimil Babka [2], on PREEMPT_RT it is unnecessary to
defer call_rcu() under IRQ-disabled section or raw spinlock. However,
let us avoid adding more complexity as the scenario is not supposed
to be common on PREEMPT_RT, with a hope that call_rcu_nolock() will be
soon supported in RCU.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/6811cc17-8ee4-48c8-8cbf-6bf4d9f98162@kernel.org [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/40591888-3a87-433e-b3d2-cda1cab543be@kernel.org [2]
Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Harry Yoo (Oracle) <harry@kernel.org>
---
 mm/slab_common.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 mm/slub.c        | 17 ++++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
index d81cc2136c68..9c2cca9add89 100644
--- a/mm/slab_common.c
+++ b/mm/slab_common.c
@@ -1628,6 +1628,14 @@ static bool kfree_rcu_sheaf(void *obj)
 {
 	struct kmem_cache *s;
 	struct slab *slab;
+	unsigned int free_flags = SLAB_FREE_DEFAULT;
+
+	/*
+	 * It is not safe to spin on PREEMPT_RT because the kernel might be
+	 * holding a raw spinlock and slab acquires sleeping locks.
+	 */
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
+		free_flags = SLAB_FREE_NOLOCK;
 
 	if (is_vmalloc_addr(obj))
 		return false;
@@ -1638,7 +1646,7 @@ static bool kfree_rcu_sheaf(void *obj)
 
 	s = slab->slab_cache;
 	if (likely(!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) || slab_nid(slab) == numa_mem_id()))
-		return __kfree_rcu_sheaf(s, obj, SLAB_FREE_DEFAULT);
+		return __kfree_rcu_sheaf(s, obj, free_flags);
 
 	return false;
 }
@@ -1987,7 +1995,7 @@ void kvfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void *ptr)
 	if (!head)
 		might_sleep();
 
-	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && kfree_rcu_sheaf(ptr))
+	if (kfree_rcu_sheaf(ptr))
 		return;
 
 	// Queue the object but don't yet schedule the batch.
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 92c99ff34a2c..6c81722afb18 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -6085,12 +6085,13 @@ static void rcu_free_sheaf(struct rcu_head *head)
  * kvfree_call_rcu() can be called while holding a raw_spinlock_t. Since
  * __kfree_rcu_sheaf() may acquire a spinlock_t (sleeping lock on PREEMPT_RT),
  * this would violate lock nesting rules. Therefore, kvfree_call_rcu() avoids
- * this problem by bypassing the sheaves layer entirely on PREEMPT_RT.
+ * this problem by passing SLAB_FREE_NOLOCK on PREEMPT_RT.
  *
  * However, lockdep still complains that it is invalid to acquire spinlock_t
  * while holding raw_spinlock_t, even on !PREEMPT_RT where spinlock_t is a
  * spinning lock. Tell lockdep that acquiring spinlock_t is valid here
- * by temporarily raising the wait-type to LD_WAIT_CONFIG.
+ * by temporarily raising the wait-type to LD_WAIT_CONFIG. Skip the lockdep map
+ * on PREEMPT_RT to avoid suppressing valid lockdep warnings.
  */
 static DEFINE_WAIT_OVERRIDE_MAP(kfree_rcu_sheaf_map, LD_WAIT_CONFIG);
 
@@ -6100,10 +6101,10 @@ bool __kfree_rcu_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, void *obj, unsigned int free_flags)
 	struct slab_sheaf *rcu_sheaf;
 	bool allow_spin = free_flags_allow_spinning(free_flags);
 
-	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)))
-		return false;
+	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && allow_spin);
 
-	lock_map_acquire_try(&kfree_rcu_sheaf_map);
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
+		lock_map_acquire_try(&kfree_rcu_sheaf_map);
 
 	if (!local_trylock(&s->cpu_sheaves->lock))
 		goto fail;
@@ -6202,12 +6203,14 @@ bool __kfree_rcu_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, void *obj, unsigned int free_flags)
 	local_unlock(&s->cpu_sheaves->lock);
 
 	stat(s, FREE_RCU_SHEAF);
-	lock_map_release(&kfree_rcu_sheaf_map);
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
+		lock_map_release(&kfree_rcu_sheaf_map);
 	return true;
 
 fail:
 	stat(s, FREE_RCU_SHEAF_FAIL);
-	lock_map_release(&kfree_rcu_sheaf_map);
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
+		lock_map_release(&kfree_rcu_sheaf_map);
 	return false;
 }
 

-- 
2.53.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-29  8:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-29  8:20 [PATCH v5 0/8] mm/slab: introduce kfree_rcu_nolock() and improve slub_kunit coverage Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-29  8:20 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] mm/slab, slub_kunit: register kprobe to trigger _nolock APIs Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-29  8:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29  8:20 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] mm/slab: handle the !allow_spin case in kfree_rcu_sheaf() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-29  8:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 11:10   ` hu.shengming
2026-07-29  8:20 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] mm/slab: use call_rcu() in unknown context if irqs are enabled Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-29  8:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 11:21   ` hu.shengming
2026-08-03  7:19     ` Harry Yoo
2026-08-03  8:41       ` hu.shengming
2026-08-03 15:30       ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-07-29  8:20 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] mm/slab: extend deferred free mechanism to handle rcu sheaves Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-29  8:20 ` Harry Yoo (Oracle) [this message]
2026-07-29  8:43   ` [PATCH v5 5/8] mm/slab: allow kfree_rcu_sheaf() on PREEMPT_RT sashiko-bot
2026-07-29  8:20 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] mm/slab: introduce struct kvfree_rcu_head for kvfree_rcu batching Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-29  8:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29  8:20 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] mm/slab: introduce kfree_rcu_nolock() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-29  8:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29  8:20 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] slub_kunit: extend the test for kfree_rcu_nolock() Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-07-29  8:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 14:14 ` [PATCH v5 0/8] mm/slab: introduce kfree_rcu_nolock() and improve slub_kunit coverage Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-07-30  3:08   ` Harry Yoo
2026-07-30  9:01     ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260729-kfree_rcu_nolock-v5-5-a28cdcda9673@kernel.org \
    --to=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=boqun@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
    --cc=hu.shengming@zte.com.cn \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
    --cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®