From: Igor Paunovic <royalnet026@gmail.com>
To: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
Cc: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net>,
Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@kernel.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Igor Paunovic <royalnet026@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] accel/rocket: clear rdev on device init failure
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 09:21:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260730072124.174165-1-royalnet026@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708062845.716487-1-lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
Hi Guangshuo,
I have been working on this driver on RK3588 (Orange Pi 5 Plus) and
went through your fix carefully:
- The analysis matches the code: rocket_probe() publishes the ERR_PTR
into the file-scoped rdev before the IS_ERR() check, and since
__driver_attach() keeps probing the remaining devices after a failed
probe, the next rknn-core dereferences the poisoned pointer at
rdev->num_cores. Every RK3588 DT carries three rknn-core nodes, so
the follow-up probe is guaranteed.
- rocket_device_init() cannot return -EPROBE_DEFER (it does no clock,
regulator or supplier lookups), so clearing rdev here cannot
interfere with the deferral path in rocket_core_init(), which
already resets rdev correctly further down in rocket_probe().
- The fix mirrors the shape the driver already uses on the
rocket_core_init() failure path (fini + rdev = NULL) and changes
nothing on the success path.
Reviewed-by: Igor Paunovic <royalnet026@gmail.com>
I also ran the patched driver on RK3588: normal three-core probe,
runtime PM suspend/resume and a Teflon/MobileNetV1 inference run are
all unaffected.
Thanks,
Igor
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-30 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 6:28 Guangshuo Li
2026-07-30 7:21 ` Igor Paunovic [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260730072124.174165-1-royalnet026@gmail.com \
--to=royalnet026@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lgs201920130244@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ogabbay@kernel.org \
--cc=tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®