From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-oa1-f48.google.com (mail-oa1-f48.google.com [209.85.160.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56F1B43CEE7 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2026 14:30:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.160.48 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785421822; cv=none; b=GEHiTbYOcLTVSOIOlh/qrfmZK+5rLiCDM+aNyo8GCLm9pIJjy5z/Grn+7PSAxm+ZnDVxCY43aDl5Mo34cJbMU7IvPMoJhPV+Ayi129k2GXhvlPPvfCxL2fJyoaN1mBJnFhHGVq7G8zYVDT7SU8iORRJkjH2qA9Y9FasRkShurnQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785421822; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6zxsMNNBcnPilLYN0lpOH6oC8qH8IQaVIGoWa8512x4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=LzB4efwQv5aV5jcbVGqQVPG+Dp1GuQmSDvXqF0YA/1jOrWeHo2UuzgOQf+983Z9MRAURrQtCWLAFtdEEFdQam3MUCbwyLuz30m8rF64Tp1eNMAzbDHdQT7JlVQAyIcoIX4aNn2HF2Q8s5GiAkr5AtVuNzfVAaPRP3P8W5SbMzzk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=jbUfHsAb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.160.48 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="jbUfHsAb" Received: by mail-oa1-f48.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-455ee8f529dso456648fac.1 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2026 07:30:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1785421820; x=1786026620; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=PziV63Nbks27UfV1soZbzQSjz5qZMrsSwS8b4MFid6w=; b=jbUfHsAbVQouSfaVk1kNLikd+kdeEEeJcUrNu4bmOyo1T6vua7q4f2tm+JY4ROCSZp VNwgLwUw0H74b2wFK+hTStGiWIiqvr6aRi8Q2oTXkPtYD5pUEyOVDPdaDt3s12CPgZJp wr5zaIiOWygG24kFLUA7XwHnsD0k72plmdSfqeNU+toH7ctiQE8OXwUPHELN5wnMpyXM 7ePJHe+m1DiCv3BBBk3qrtuOBbmUY498CqGzhFEwAIQxfgB0PVjGw3CNO8peHuLyRSdN cqIFeq+1DAtlvFwqKDCu5XpdIXSZ8GnKV83rkLfVO/+Vuq4NOoqrVkTz9yDbM+UyslFe 38MA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1785421820; x=1786026620; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=PziV63Nbks27UfV1soZbzQSjz5qZMrsSwS8b4MFid6w=; b=Qi9v51eueMd2mhKSJDz3ZJUxxEHUIYvOHPk0UuNwFtcvcnW7XYcB1CRAaqvKpe2eqt +bCz59y4Zrr0S1qwiLC+Du9rVxLJfDNKd1VA/KawuSN6s2+oZputiCPG1js2TdcC+SOl iI6JaHqsL6+znCWcx65EWoEuutQqE8+VgvUoL60CtybXH/KGzej7ApvB5bZiFzeI/VA/ x+VPayAz5DdFr593Yq1/tVEu7DX1pHL1GsCLahxVtFQ6cxCi+sDLDDbd0hl41A/VQPc+ ogoDJmCtuxTRZP92V14k1k/Au/NB/Binu5W34teb8I4wUdGNLEKtUIUE4k5ueW9UuUxS ZzHw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AHgh+RoLnt09eimypq80OqZIfv2ejwmeWjFLTFAOGhiKfMJDUYko6ZXrwE6k7YTDH6DeTxP5AeNmTLFyZ2EgKyg=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz8G+j3QueYYLgfuiiSKujsvjsJXZpGd40NP8pFEkCYc1xIgLBQ 1140XytoQ4QnRlycn6ykXtfcRaYtJ09miAAUszcTkDa98vlX+EdGgbhB X-Gm-Gg: AR+sD120F/rgtzqhYrCepDvgMt9Ng5Ycxo5dpkEhgub2paKmf2DEHU43z4fE2dA9sQs EA+ktuMRc9u6X7p06d4GOtuNY09Jy1W0J/xQMrSU+v+JnndA4ij0S2s9VJFvjpEwxylBzDNSWhr /bKM+8cGgA9goGlYTfqkbUVAoFZfA8BwbOe0KWfB23MnR3MEKc1xm2qlntZVXqasyvTT7S4hhRs JhW5cgLzXIDYiBctk1Mv4kstjqUvgCe9f79BxOC3GiUmuqHkvPFy8DcaVDjXs6GEWrw2AVBaIjo TYrzU1mQQ09KyEdLqXPul8iGcvelmYhczky3q1lTMvSyL43x3KEDkRZ6vPvCTyb9nyXUCJyK075 NckTCcsa8raf7oL+5oXVzaThKzpYjQPDXXqnzmNZ71z6PPawdSAtL9Sahyv/zF2mCoesCpbg3G7 zHIJAju1RpJ57jHzTwYwzBT9h115VethCVBHSvplkTWbkajqKrBl3ZhtP9plCDezJ1bnf3TnYyQ plcE/4sfxTLBnMpGD/NaKnEEo/NHw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:8263:b0:456:5582:19be with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-458c1b24576mr1955115fac.38.1785421820045; Thu, 30 Jul 2026 07:30:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a03:2880:10ff:41::]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 586e51a60fabf-458c2947cc5sm1964872fac.11.2026.07.30.07.30.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 30 Jul 2026 07:30:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Joshua Hahn To: Oliver Sang Cc: oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com, Johannes Weiner , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, "Michal Hocko" , Roman Gushchin , "Shakeel Butt" , Muchun Song , "Andrew Morton" , David Hildenbrand , Lorenzo Stoakes , "Liam R . Howlett" , Vlastimil Babka , Mike Rapoport , Suren Baghdasaryan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, tim.c.chen@intel.com, vinicius.gomes@intel.com, ehab.ababneh@intel.com, thomas.falcon@intel.com, yu.c.chen@intel.com, philip.li@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] mm/memcontrol: convert memcg to use page_counter_stock Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 07:30:16 -0700 Message-ID: <20260730143017.1568456-1-joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Thu, 30 Jul 2026 14:56:22 +0800 Oliver Sang wrote: > hi, Joshua Hahn, > > we are currently piloting AI integrations to help enhance 0-Day's performance > analysis and regression-detection capabilities. Since this is in an early trial > phase, we want to ensure we build features that genuinely support your workflow. > We would love to hear what you would like to see from AI-assisted reports, whether > it's specific bottleneck explanations, a cleaner format, or filtering ideas. > > Please share your thoughts and suggestions with us to help guide our development! > Hello Oliver, Thank you for this sample fix, and thank you for the report. It helped me realize that uncharging should return stock, but only in the networking side (and not the lru side, since it's already batched there). This is a personal style preference but I like to keep reply context as minimal as possible, I think that the AI response might not need to keep all the performance statistics still in the reply at the end : -) Otherwise I am a big fan of this (for my patches, at least) as an author. I'm wondering if reviewers and maintainers may find this to be too noisy to be sent out in the mailing list. Thank you again, I hope you have a great day! Joshua