From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
kernel-team@meta.com, marco.crivellari@suse.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] workqueue: factor out alloc_and_link_percpu_pwqs()
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 04:57:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260731-wq-pool-refactor-v1-2-8eaf71cdab5f@debian.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260731-wq-pool-refactor-v1-0-8eaf71cdab5f@debian.org>
Move the per-cpu pwq allocation loop out of alloc_and_link_pwqs() into a
helper. The inner allocation-failure path now returns -ENOMEM and the
caller jumps to the existing enomem cleanup, equivalent to the previous
goto.
Now that the per-cpu branch returns a value through the helper, the
per-cpu, ordered and unbound cases share a single error-handling tail.
Turn the separate per-cpu block and the ordered/unbound if/else into one
if/else-if/else chain, dropping the early return and the duplicated goto.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 63a39bb3f5e47..b386a457c0381 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -5666,6 +5666,28 @@ static void unbound_wq_update_pwq(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int cpu)
put_pwq_unlocked(old_pwq);
}
+static int alloc_and_link_percpu_pwqs(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
+{
+ int cpu;
+
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ struct pool_workqueue **pwq_p = per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwq, cpu);
+ struct worker_pool *pool = get_percpu_pool(wq, cpu);
+
+ *pwq_p = kmem_cache_alloc_node(pwq_cache, GFP_KERNEL, pool->node);
+ if (!*pwq_p)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ init_pwq(*pwq_p, wq, pool);
+
+ mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
+ link_pwq(*pwq_p);
+ mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int alloc_and_link_pwqs(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
{
bool highpri = wq->flags & WQ_HIGHPRI;
@@ -5678,25 +5700,8 @@ static int alloc_and_link_pwqs(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
goto enomem;
if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)) {
- for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
- struct pool_workqueue **pwq_p = per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwq, cpu);
- struct worker_pool *pool = get_percpu_pool(wq, cpu);
-
- *pwq_p = kmem_cache_alloc_node(pwq_cache, GFP_KERNEL,
- pool->node);
- if (!*pwq_p)
- goto enomem;
-
- init_pwq(*pwq_p, wq, pool);
-
- mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
- link_pwq(*pwq_p);
- mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
- }
- return 0;
- }
-
- if (wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED) {
+ ret = alloc_and_link_percpu_pwqs(wq);
+ } else if (wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED) {
struct pool_workqueue *dfl_pwq;
ret = apply_workqueue_attrs_locked(wq, ordered_wq_attrs[highpri]);
--
2.53.0-Meta
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-31 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-31 11:57 [PATCH 0/6] workqueue: base pwq pool release and nr_active on the backing pool Breno Leitao
2026-07-31 11:57 ` [PATCH 1/6] workqueue: factor out get_percpu_pool() Breno Leitao
2026-07-31 11:57 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2026-07-31 11:57 ` [PATCH 3/6] workqueue: release pwq pools by pool type Breno Leitao
2026-08-03 0:31 ` Tejun Heo
2026-08-03 14:02 ` Breno Leitao
2026-08-03 16:50 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-31 11:57 ` [PATCH 4/6] workqueue: account nr_active by the backing pool Breno Leitao
2026-08-03 0:34 ` Tejun Heo
2026-08-03 14:19 ` Breno Leitao
2026-07-31 11:57 ` [PATCH 5/6] workqueue: add a per-cpu backend for unbound pwqs Breno Leitao
2026-08-03 0:36 ` Tejun Heo
2026-08-03 16:35 ` Breno Leitao
2026-08-03 16:58 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-31 11:57 ` [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: install per-cpu pwqs at creation for __WQ_PERCPU_POOLS Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260731-wq-pool-refactor-v1-2-8eaf71cdab5f@debian.org \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®