mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Diogo Ivo (Schneider Electric)" <diogo.ivo@bootlin.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulfh@kernel.org>,  Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@ti.com>,
	Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Pascal EBERHARD <pascal.eberhard@se.com>,
	 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	 Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	 "Diogo Ivo (Schneider Electric)" <diogo.ivo@bootlin.com>,
	 stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] mmc: sdhci_am654: Fix DDR50 mode for cards without tuning support
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2026 15:47:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260803-am654-sdhci-v2-0-a5ee5be86133@bootlin.com> (raw)

DDR50 mode is not required to support the tuning command CMD19 by the
eMMC/SD specification, meaning that calibration may fail on cards that
do not implement it. This series fixes four issues discovered when
using such cards:

  - Patch 1 moves the tuning_loop counter from a persistent struct field
    to a local variable, preventing failed tuning attempts from depleting
    the retry budget across calls.

  - Patch 2 ensures the command/data line reset is always performed
    after tuning, even on failure, preventing stale data in the
    controller buffer.

  - Patch 3 clears the ITAPDLY enable and delay values on tuning
    failure so that leftover calibration values do not interfere with
    subsequent I/O.

  - Patch 4 falls back to the DT-provided itap delay value for DDR50
    when tuning fails in this mode, making a best-effort attempt at a
    known-good delay being programmed.

Together these changes make DDR50 functional on TI J721E SoCs with
cards that lack CMD19 tuning support. This second version addresses
all comments from Sashiko, which I found to be correct.

Signed-off-by: Diogo Ivo (Schneider Electric) <diogo.ivo@bootlin.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Add new patch moving tuning_loop to a local variable (Patch 1)
- Clear ITAPDLY array values alongside HW registers on tuning failure (Patch 3)
- Save DT-provided itap delay values for DDR50 in dedicated variables
  to preserve them across tuning cycles (Patch 4)
- Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260729-am654-sdhci-v1-0-7568108e4b9a@bootlin.com

---
Diogo Ivo (Schneider Electric) (4):
      mmc: sdhci_am654: Move tuning_loop to local variable
      mmc: sdhci_am654: Reset command and data lines on failed tuning
      mmc: sdhci_am654: Clear ITAPDLY on tuning failure
      mmc: sdhci_am654: Fallback to DT-provided itap delay on DDR50 tuning failure

 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: f932188d6b0b684ee8555c8ecf1cac3567c4b106
change-id: 20260728-am654-sdhci-85094d458bae

Best regards,
--  
Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo@bootlin.com>


             reply	other threads:[~2026-08-03 13:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-03 13:47 Diogo Ivo (Schneider Electric) [this message]
2026-08-03 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mmc: sdhci_am654: Move tuning_loop to local variable Diogo Ivo (Schneider Electric)
2026-08-03 19:19   ` Mendez, Judith
2026-08-03 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mmc: sdhci_am654: Reset command and data lines on failed tuning Diogo Ivo (Schneider Electric)
2026-08-03 19:28   ` Mendez, Judith
2026-08-03 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mmc: sdhci_am654: Clear ITAPDLY on tuning failure Diogo Ivo (Schneider Electric)
2026-08-03 19:40   ` Mendez, Judith
2026-08-03 13:47 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mmc: sdhci_am654: Fallback to DT-provided itap delay on DDR50 " Diogo Ivo (Schneider Electric)
2026-08-03 19:59   ` Mendez, Judith
2026-08-04  8:45     ` Diogo Ivo
2026-08-05 23:13       ` Mendez, Judith
2026-08-07  6:35         ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 10:52           ` Diogo Ivo
2026-08-07  8:16 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] mmc: sdhci_am654: Fix DDR50 mode for cards without tuning support Adrian Hunter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260803-am654-sdhci-v2-0-a5ee5be86133@bootlin.com \
    --to=diogo.ivo@bootlin.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=faiz_abbas@ti.com \
    --cc=jm@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=pascal.eberhard@se.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=ulfh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®