From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Yao Kai <yaokai34@huawei.com>
Cc: tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, dvhart@infradead.org,
dave@stgolabs.net, andrealmeid@igalia.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, liuyongqiang13@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] futex: Fix missed wakeup during private hash resize
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 11:16:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260804091605.GJ49951@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260803104313.3393274-1-yaokai34@huawei.com>
On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 06:43:13PM +0800, Yao Kai wrote:
> A task performing a custom private hash resize can remain blocked in
> uninterruptible sleep indefinitely. The hung-task detector reports:
>
> INFO: task futex-resizer:314 blocked for more than 10 seconds.
> task:futex-resizer state:D stack:14824 pid:314 tgid:312 ppid:311
>
> Call Trace:
> __schedule+0x521/0xf30
> schedule+0x22/0xa0
> futex_hash_allocate+0x3db/0x490
> __do_sys_prctl+0x6f5/0xbd0
> do_syscall_64+0xf9/0x530
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>
> Kernel panic - not syncing: hung_task: blocked tasks
>
> futex_pivot_pending() allows the resize request to continue when
> either no replacement hash is pending (hash_new == NULL) or the current
> hash reference count has reached zero.
>
> After the final-reference wake, another futex task can complete the
> pivot between the two observations:
>
> T1 T2
>
> futex_hash_allocate()
> wait_var_event(mm, ...)
> futex_pivot_pending(mm)
> hash_new != NULL
> futex_hash()
> futex_ref_get(old) -> false
> futex_pivot_hash(mm)
> hash_new = NULL
> __futex_pivot_hash(mm, new)
> rcu_assign_pointer(hash, new)
> fph = rcu_dereference(hash) /* new */
> futex_ref_is_dead(fph) -> false
> schedule()
>
> The pivot changes the state from hash_new != NULL with a dead current
> hash to hash_new == NULL with a live current hash. The resize task can
> observe hash_new in the pre-pivot state and hash in the post-pivot state,
> causing futex_pivot_pending() to return false even though the pivot has
> completed. Since a successful pivot does not notify waiters, the task
> can go to sleep after the only preceding wakeup has already been
> consumed.
>
> Wake waiters after every successful pivot. A full memory barrier before
> wake_up_var() pairs with set_current_state() in wait_var_event() and
> orders the completed pivot before the lockless waitqueue_active() check
> in wake_up_var(). The waiter therefore either observes hash_new == NULL
> before sleeping or is made runnable.
Hmm, but isn't the problem a lack of serialization on futex_mm_phash
access?
That is, all of this futex_mm_phash::hash_new and futex_mm_phash::hash
swizzling happens while holding futex_mm_phash::lock, except for
futex_pivot_pending(), that is looking at these values without holding
the lock, resulting in it observing that inconsistent state per the
above.
Taking a mutex in a wait loop is sorta yuck, but it should work. If the
mutex is contended, it sleeps and the wait-loop 'spuriously' doesn't. If
the mutex is uncontended, it doesn't sleep, but the wait-loop will.
Does this work for you?
---
diff --git a/kernel/futex/core.c b/kernel/futex/core.c
index f74ede3df161..72d4698e35fb 100644
--- a/kernel/futex/core.c
+++ b/kernel/futex/core.c
@@ -1778,14 +1778,15 @@ void futex_hash_free(struct mm_struct *mm)
static bool futex_pivot_pending(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
+ struct futex_mm_phash *mmph = &mm->futex.phash;
struct futex_private_hash *fph;
- guard(rcu)();
+ guard(mutex)(&mmph->lock);
- if (!mm->futex.phash.hash_new)
+ if (!mmph->hash_new)
return true;
- fph = rcu_dereference(mm->futex.phash.hash);
+ fph = rcu_dereference_raw(mmph->hash);
return futex_ref_is_dead(fph);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-03 10:43 Yao Kai
2026-08-04 9:16 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-08-04 11:30 ` Yao Kai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260804091605.GJ49951@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuyongqiang13@huawei.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=yaokai34@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®